Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you look at her in this picture, the page lets you hover over it and zoom in ... doesn't seem her body is airbrushed:
http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/kate-middleton-plays-volleyball-shows-amazing-post-baby-body-three-months-after-prince-georges-birth-pictures-20131810

Wouldn't this make the Queen Mother upset? showing her stomach?

The Queen Mother died in 2002. That was Queen Elizabeth's mother. She was referred to as HRH Elizabeth, The Queen Mother to avoid confusion with her daughter, HRH Queen Elizabeth.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she were not actually pregnant, and they used a surrogate, then what, over the months she wore a progressively larger prosthetic belly? What about the later-stage photos where her face did appear to show some more roundness than pre-pregnancy?

I know! Seriously! And what about the hyperemesis gravidarum? Was that just a ploy?

Anonymous wrote:If she were not actually pregnant, and they used a surrogate, then what, over the months she wore a progressively larger prosthetic belly? What about the later-stage photos where her face did appear to show some more roundness than pre-pregnancy?

Anonymous wrote:

They can selectively transfer only male embryos.

Trust me, she had a surrogate. She did not carry the baby herself. If it ever got out, it would be the worlds biggest scandal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's another view that looks pretty natural:

Definitely more natural in this one! I actually see a tiny bit of roundness. She's amazing all the way around.

Anonymous wrote:What's the connection btw a surrogate and having a boy?

the whole "washing the sperm" bit?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they had a surrogate carry the baby. For real.

What on earth would be your basis for believing that.

#1 - how convenient it was a boy

#2 - she had a really fake looking post baby bump like they were trying to fake a postpartum stomach

#3 - I have inside sources

Anonymous wrote:Here's another view that looks pretty natural:

Anonymous wrote:[google]

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, if you had a chef, personal trainer, baby nurse, and driver, don't you think that you'd be back to perfect shape regardless of genes?

Had to be one! I don't have a chef, personal trainer, baby nurse or driver. I had my pre-baby body back in 3 months. A year out, I was more toned than before baby. If you make health and fitness a priority, you'll see the results. If you don't, that's your choice. It doesn't take a team of experts to make it possible.

Also, Maria Kang rocks. "What's your excuse?" is spot on!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you look at her in this picture, the page lets you hover over it and zoom in ... doesn't seem her body is airbrushed:
http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/kate-middleton-plays-volleyball-shows-amazing-post-baby-body-three-months-after-prince-georges-birth-pictures-20131810

Wouldn't this make the Queen Mother upset? showing her stomach?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you look at her in this picture, the page lets you hover over it and zoom in ... doesn't seem her body is airbrushed:
http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/kate-middleton-plays-volleyball-shows-amazing-post-baby-body-three-months-after-prince-georges-birth-pictures-20131810

Wouldn't this make the Queen Mother upset? showing her stomach?

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, and I deliverd at 11:30 pm and was shopping at the mall at 2:30 pm the next day. I had to get something so my dh watched the baby while I ran out. Took a tylenol twice.
(they had a high census and needed to discharge some patients early and I wanted to get out of there, so they kicked me out at 9:30 am)