Anonymous wrote:I enjoy writing in cursive. It feelings relaxing. I write messages all day and always use cursive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While, for example listening to a conversation, one can capture far more detail and information using cursive than when doing block printing, and far less energy and effort is diverted into prioritization.
Cursive is much faster than printing and can capture information almost as fast as the stream of consciousness - and that helps the brain to encode information far more effectively than choppy bits and pieces via block printing.
Exactly. Learning cursive also helps in brain development.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a hard time believing it would be even remotely difficult to read cursive if you were never taught it. If presented with your dear grandmother's letter, you really wouldn't be able to figure it out? It's not code or a foreign language.
I don't see how someone who never learned cursive would recognize a cursive lowercase B, F, Q, R, or V or uppercase F, G, I, L, Q, S, T, or Z. That's a lot of letters.
They would recognize them from context. (Unless your dear grandmother was in the habit of writing individual uppercase Fs (or whatever) in her letter. Like a code.)
I can't read my dear great-grandfather's letters, because he wrote them in a German handwriting that nobody born after World War II can read.
http://www.suetterlinschrift.de/Englisch/Sutterlin.htm
Anonymous wrote:What's the big deal with learning cursive? Why not skip what you call "printing"? Always amazed how slowly people who can't write cursive write a note!
First you learn capital letters, then you learn cursive.What is printing for exactly? Computer does that!Why would you lift up your hand after each word?What a waste of time.
Anyhow, not a big deal to learn all 3.Cursive might be hard to read if the person's handwriting sucks.I've yet to not understand a note that was written in cursive.
Anonymous wrote:While, for example listening to a conversation, one can capture far more detail and information using cursive than when doing block printing, and far less energy and effort is diverted into prioritization.
Cursive is much faster than printing and can capture information almost as fast as the stream of consciousness - and that helps the brain to encode information far more effectively than choppy bits and pieces via block printing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a hard time believing it would be even remotely difficult to read cursive if you were never taught it. If presented with your dear grandmother's letter, you really wouldn't be able to figure it out? It's not code or a foreign language.
I don't see how someone who never learned cursive would recognize a cursive lowercase B, F, Q, R, or V or uppercase F, G, I, L, Q, S, T, or Z. That's a lot of letters.
Anonymous wrote:It's not another language. Kids need to learn it. If they decide not to use it, that's fine but you have to read it.
How sad it is not to be able to read letters written by your grandparents or documents written in cursive.
Stop with the crazy 2.0 stuff and teach kids how to write.
Anonymous wrote:No not important. My kid's grandmothers wrote in Korean and Russian, respectively, so DC wouldn't be able to read it anyway.
Could not care less about DC learning to read/write cursive. The only time DH and I use it is when we sign our names. We are both attorneys.
Anonymous wrote:I have a hard time believing it would be even remotely difficult to read cursive if you were never taught it. If presented with your dear grandmother's letter, you really wouldn't be able to figure it out? It's not code or a foreign language.
Anonymous wrote:It's not another language. Kids need to learn it. If they decide not to use it, that's fine but you have to read it.
How sad it is not to be able to read letters written by your grandparents or documents written in cursive.
Stop with the crazy 2.0 stuff and teach kids how to write.