Anonymous wrote:I'm 35 and there is no way in hell I would date anyone over 42, max. My husband is 4 years older than me, at 39. That's about my limit. I can't believe all these people who think that 50, 55, 60, even 65 year old men can easily and regularly date women in their 20s and 30s. Gross.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.
Ms Bolton respectfully disagrees.![]()
http://money.cnn.com/2013/09/22/investing/george-soros-wedding/
But she's not really sleeping with him at 83 is she?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.
"sexual stride" is a madeup term. Women in their 20s are much hotter and more fertile.
Same for men.
Not really. Men's attractiveness depends on many factors, of which looks is only one. Accomplishments, money, maturity, education are very important to most women. We're talking about dating here. Women's attractiveness depends mainly on looks and youth.
So men probably peak lookswise at 25-30, but their other criteria are increasing after that. Meanwhile, women peak lookswise at 25 at the latest, and that's the main criteria. Your professional accomplishments don't mean anything to a man, though he does want someone with a degree (something which is decided by 22).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.
Ms Bolton respectfully disagrees.![]()
http://money.cnn.com/2013/09/22/investing/george-soros-wedding/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.
"sexual stride" is a madeup term. Women in their 20s are much hotter and more fertile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.
"sexual stride" is a madeup term. Women in their 20s are much hotter and more fertile.
Same for men.
Not really. Men's attractiveness depends on many factors, of which looks is only one. Accomplishments, money, maturity, education are very important to most women. We're talking about dating here. Women's attractiveness depends mainly on looks and youth.
So men probably peak lookswise at 25-30, but their other criteria are increasing after that. Meanwhile, women peak lookswise at 25 at the latest, and that's the main criteria. Your professional accomplishments don't mean anything to a man, though he does want someone with a degree (something which is decided by 22).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.
"sexual stride" is a madeup term. Women in their 20s are much hotter and more fertile.
Same for men.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.
"sexual stride" is a madeup term. Women in their 20s are much hotter and more fertile.
Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.
Anonymous wrote:This is not the dark ages...there should not be a difference of more than 4 years in my opinion. Women hit their sexual stride in their late 30s and 40s...so to have a partner who is very much older than her is a big no-no.