Anonymous wrote:Let me add two more things to my post above. Cameras will deter abusers because they will get caught. Here is an article that says cameras that are put on police cause a drop in citizen complaints by almost 90%.
http://www.policeone.com/less-lethal/articles/6191744-Study-proves-cop-cameras-cut-citizen-complaints/
It is stupid to suggest that cameras or having extra adults around won't deter abuse. You just sound foolish when you suggest as much.
Secondly, you are may be right in that it will push abuse outside the classroom, but it will be harder. That is also where parents can have more control. Trust me, most parents aren't going to drive their kids over to Mr. Joynes' house for an unsupervised play date. His only access is at school or some other kid activity.
Anonymous wrote:What 'rights' does the PP think will be taken away?
I am in healthcare and we are NEVER allowed to be alone with a minor without an adult present.
Why should a teacher be allowed to lock himself in a room with a student? What teacher needs the 'right' to have private time alone with a FIRST GRADER??
What about the rights of those girls to not be molested?
Ugh, this story makes me sick. This should have been nipped in the bud. There are no excuses as to why this was allowed to occur.
This is my child's assigned school. The best spin I can put on this is that Starr is indifferent to child abuse in the classroom. I'm disgusted and hope nobody out there ever has to experience the arrogance, indifference, and complete incompetence that comes out when fundamental and serious issues arise in MoCo schools. I never cared much when it was BS associated with trivial policy issues, but MCPS's response to this is absurdly awful. Somebody better be held accountable. This is so awful.
Anonymous wrote:And more importantly, were all of the parents of the children who were in that locked room with him told about the incident and given an opportunity to decide whether or not to allow that creep to continue having contact with their children?
Anonymous wrote:Do you work? It appears as though you don't.
If I'm wrong, then let's put a video camera in your office so we can see you picking your nose and listen to you fart and burp whenever the urge hits.
You don't get it.
Yes, there are fucking freaks of nature in the classrooms, but the majority of teachers are not in that category.
When I read posts like this, I often think that the PPs were abused themselves but never fully came to terms with that. So now there's this obsession with becoming Big Brother by creating a controlled environment where everyone is under scrutiny.
just plain weird . . .
I teach. I work with quite a few dedicated individuals who would NEVER harm a child.
I fail to see how this need to spy on teachers will stop abuse from happening. If people are predators, they will find a way to abuse kids OUTSIDE of the classroom.
And honestly, PP, do you THINK teachers are fondling kids during an English lesson?![]()
And we wonder why this country is falling apart????
Anonymous wrote:
What 'right' are you talking about? The right to be alone with kids in your classroom without anyone looking at you. I guess I disagree. I think the rights of children to have a safe environment are also important. There needs to be some check or control point on the teacher, whether it is having other adults present or cameras or something. I am open to suggestions.
Also,
- If a concern is raised, no one at the school should make the call on whether an investigation should take place.
- Teachers should not be allowed to socialize with students outside of school related activities.
- There should be lots of ongoing training and awareness campaigns for teachers, staff, students, and parents.
It is pretty clear to me that in sports, churches, schools and other places where children are overseen by unrelated adults, you will find child predators. They fish where the fish congregate. We can't live in a dream world about this. I don't think MCPS is focused on this issue, though. That guy Starnes still teaches at Kemp Mill ES, afterall.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about video cameras in the classrooms?
It's not secret that principals can and do listen to teachers on the intercom. Add to it the cameras and many teachers will feel completely nervous and won't be able to do a good job.
This is completely untrue.
We have an intercom we use if we need something/someone - security, for example, to escort a child out, or to tell the office if a sub hasn't shown up. But principals don't push a button and suddenly *** POOF *** they can magically hear what's going on.
We have cameras in the hallways that record actions and have caught several students up to no good. But that's about it.
I don't agree with cameras in the classroom. Unfortunately, if that does happen, teachers - like people slowing down by speed cameras - will eventually get used to the intrusion. And slowly and gradually our rights will be taken away from us . . . and no one will notice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about video cameras in the classrooms?
It's not secret that principals can and do listen to teachers on the intercom. Add to it the cameras and many teachers will feel completely nervous and won't be able to do a good job.