DCUM Forum

Anonymous

08/01/2013 23:17 Subject: Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

The adoptive parents, even though the court ruled in favor of the father, kept the child for 2 yrs before turning her over. And now they say the father is obstructing the court system. It was fine when the Capobiancos were doing the obstructing.

For some of you condemning the father, you might want to read up on the FULL story before condemning him. He was with the mother, asked her to marry him when they found out she was pregnant, tried to support her and SHE refused to let him, would not tell him when the baby was born, and set up the adoption behind his back. The Capobiancos took the baby when she was 3 days old to South Carolina, filed for the adoption there, all the time knowing that the father wanted to keep the baby. He was served the papers less than a week from deployment to Iraq, which the birth mother knew about. She gave the Capobiancos his name, and misspelled in on purpose, so to give the adoptive parents more time to push through the adoption. The Capobiancos never had his permission, and took to the media to paint the father as a dead beat dad. The birth mother is the one who started this mess, and the Capobiancos kept the mess going.

Anonymous

08/01/2013 23:15 Subject: Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

And will she grow up to hate her bio-dad for not letting her see or talk to her bio-mom ---because remember---the bio-mom chose the adoptive parents because they agreed to an open adoption---whereas bio-dad jerked the child away at age 2 from everyone she knew and has never let her see or talk to the bio-mom or the adoptive parents again. You can argue that his rights trump that of the adoptive parents---you cannot argue that he is right to cut the bio-mom completely out of the child's life when the bio-mom was always clear about wanting contact.

Anonymous

08/01/2013 23:13 Subject: Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this child will grow up knowing that her father did not want her.

Thankfully, she will know that the Capobianco's ALWAYS wanted her. I am grateful baby Veronica will soon have them again.

This father DID want her and has been successfully parenting for quite some time. What they did was wrong. What their attorney's did was wrong. This child belongs with her father and biological family. She will grow up to hate the Capobianco's for taking her away from her father.

What the hell is wrong with you? It's almost like you're continually rooting for the child to grow up hating the Capobiancos?

Anonymous

08/01/2013 23:05 Subject: Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this child will grow up knowing that her father did not want her.

Thankfully, she will know that the Capobianco's ALWAYS wanted her. I am grateful baby Veronica will soon have them again.

This father DID want her and has been successfully parenting for quite some time. What they did was wrong. What their attorney's did was wrong. This child belongs with her father and biological family. She will grow up to hate the Capobianco's for taking her away from her father.

Anonymous

08/01/2013 23:01 Subject: Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

Did the child have contact with the adoptive parents while in her bio dad's custody?

Anonymous

08/01/2013 22:59 Subject: Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

The bio mom is a real peice of work. She kenw where the dad was...it's not like he was homeless. He was in the military living on a base. I am sure she knew how to contact him. She wanted to sell his baby. She wanted to do this to hurt him.

Anonymous

08/01/2013 22:55 Subject: Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

The adoptive parents look like crazed, depressive nutcases. They are selfish and entitled. The fraudulently obtained this child, and now they will pay.....if she goes back, they will have a child who will resent them and have trust and attachment issues. If she stays with her dad, they will have lost their "investment". They do not deserve to have her as they should have been ethical from the start. Had they adopted a baby that was truly available, they would have spared all involved a whole mess of heartache.

Anonymous

08/01/2013 22:44 Subject: Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

Anonymous wrote:Dads everywhere in this country need to beware of barren bitches. They will covet your kids, and buy then if they can.

+10000000

It is so sick and twisted. They become so desperate they will stop at nothing to get their hands on a child to play house.

Anonymous

08/01/2013 22:41 Subject: Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

The military demands that you do that, it is a requirement when you are deployed. Not a termination of parental rights. This is not about our opinion of what fathers should be like, but legal recognition of a man as a parent. Does South Carolina get to descide or the state you live in?

Anonymous

08/01/2013 22:28 Subject: Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this child will grow up knowing that her father did not want her.

Thankfully, she will know that the Capobianco's ALWAYS wanted her. I am grateful baby Veronica will soon have them again. [/
WTF!
He fought for her
She will know THAT!
Some of you nutballs are seriously projecting.

No projecting. He signed off on custody. You're really disputing this? Seriously?

You are arguing with a poster who has changed the whole factual record to suit her anti-adoption lunatic opinion. You can't argue the facts with her; she is uninterested in what actually happened, and prefers her "interpretation."

Anonymous

08/01/2013 22:26 Subject: Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She belongs with her bio-Dad. I don't see how the adoptive family can even sleep at night knowing this child is wanted by her family of origin and yet still wanting to keep her, as if she's a pet and not a human.

Agreed. Adoption should not be about taking children from parents willing to raise their children. This entire case is a disgrace. At the very least, the biological Dad should be allowed 50/50 custody of the child.

But, of course, he wasn't interested in raising his daughter when he needed to make that decision. He's not entitled to come back, months later, when she has a stable home and declare his 'rights.' His use of the IWCA was (as the Supreme Court found) not what the law was intended for. It's almost absurd that he used this law. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the adoptive parents stole this child - this child was placed with them by the biological mother who still firmly stands by her decision.

Mothers shouldn't be the final say in adoption. Fathers should also have a say. To suggest otherwise, is highly insulting.

Wow. But here, the mother has NO say. Gestational mother's rights trump the sperm donor's. And that is all he was through 9 months of pregnancy and 4 months of his dd's life. Stop rewriting the story to make him somehow the victim. Go back and read the court records. You would be shocked, apparently, as you think he was deceived. Nope - you are advocating for a man who said, you can raise the baby by yourself with no financial, physical or emotional support from me, as I drop off the face of the earth after impregnating you. I will never call about the baby, or show any interest in seeing her. I will never send you a single dime to support her. I am happy to let you raise the child as a single mother, but God forbid you try to put the child's interests first and let someone else adopt her. Wow. You have chosen to back a prince of a man.