Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is remarkable, and has to change, is how musch money big clients pay big law firms. It's crazy, especially when the client can hire smaller, boutique, law firms much less for sometimes better work. I don't get it.
This. And, aside from huge litigations, oftentimes (not just sometimes) better work.
Anonymous wrote:What is remarkable, and has to change, is how musch money big clients pay big law firms. It's crazy, especially when the client can hire smaller, boutique, law firms much less for sometimes better work. I don't get it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lawyers do disgusting things thats why the money is high. Did you see devils advocate.
You watch too much tv. Most lawyers do really boring uncontroversial things.
"Implications of a 501 c 3 renting unused office space to a for profit entity above cost when the 501 c 3 has the ability to exist the existing lease"
Booya bitch!!!!
"The documents are neither relevant to plaintiffs' causes of action nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence."
Yeah, I'm definitely going to hell.
Sometimes the phrases just go around and around in whats left of my brain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lawyers do disgusting things thats why the money is high. Did you see devils advocate.
You watch too much tv. Most lawyers do really boring uncontroversial things.
"Implications of a 501 c 3 renting unused office space to a for profit entity above cost when the 501 c 3 has the ability to exist the existing lease"
Booya bitch!!!!
"The documents are neither relevant to plaintiffs' causes of action nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence."
Yeah, I'm definitely going to hell.
Sometimes the phrases just go around and around in whats left of my brain.