Anonymous
09/17/2013 16:22
Subject: Re:E. L. Haynes v. Yu Ying
Tier 1 = Top performing schools based on test scores
Tier 2 = Second best...
Tier 3 = Third best... (i.e. needs significant improvement on test scores)
Tier 2 = Second best...
Tier 3 = Third best... (i.e. needs significant improvement on test scores)
Anonymous
09/16/2013 18:35
Subject: E. L. Haynes v. Yu Ying
Anonymous wrote:http://www.dcpubliccharter.com/News-Room.aspx?id=276
Here are the results for all the charter schools
I apologise for my ignorance, but looking at the link, what are Tier 1 and Tier 2?
Anonymous
09/16/2013 09:51
Subject: E. L. Haynes v. Yu Ying
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Only 2 grades to compare, 2012 numbers:
EL Haynes 3rd
R = 48%
M = 42%
YY 3rd
R = 66%
M = 57%
EL Haynes 4th
R = 53%
M = 51%
YY 4th
R = 82%
M = 71%
I suggest you do your own research. I have no idea where PP poster got her numbers for YY but when I did some probing on the DC Charter board site for 2012 Composite scores, Haynes had significantly better scores for both their AA and Caucasion students in Math (BIG discrepancy) and for their AA students in Reading (about 4% higher). Haynes scores were a about 1% better for Reading for their Caucasion students. The Hispanic students appeared to really pull down the Reading numbers for Haynes.
jajaj the Spanish pulling the numbers down when it seen like the Spanish are only a small number of the student population most of the student here are AA and Caucasion
+1. Over 50% Haynes students are AA, so it seems highly suspicious to try to blame bad overall results on minority Hispanic group. Overall YY results are clearly better than Haynes. That is of course not the only consideration, but please don't fudge the numbers.
Anonymous
09/13/2013 20:23
Subject: E. L. Haynes v. Yu Ying
Anonymous wrote:
Only 2 grades to compare, 2012 numbers:
EL Haynes 3rd
R = 48%
M = 42%
YY 3rd
R = 66%
M = 57%
EL Haynes 4th
R = 53%
M = 51%
YY 4th
R = 82%
M = 71%
I suggest you do your own research. I have no idea where PP poster got her numbers for YY but when I did some probing on the DC Charter board site for 2012 Composite scores, Haynes had significantly better scores for both their AA and Caucasion students in Math (BIG discrepancy) and for their AA students in Reading (about 4% higher). Haynes scores were a about 1% better for Reading for their Caucasion students. The Hispanic students appeared to really pull down the Reading numbers for Haynes.
jajaj the Spanish pulling the numbers down when it seen like the Spanish are only a small number of the student population most of the student here are AA and Caucasion