Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's fine if you want to live in the south. But outside of the south, it's not well-known.
So what? Most people don't know about small New England LACs outside of the Boston-DC corredor.
Not the PP, but the point is that Wake Forest might not be a good choice for students who don't want to stay in the south after graduation. So, a kid from this area who isn't familiar with the south, but who's thinking, "well, I'll try living in the south for college and if I don't like it, I'll move elsewhere after graduation" might find it tough going to look for a job in other parts of the country. A fair point, but maybe not determinative. Keep in mind, school reputations rise and fall. Not a lot of folks in this area had heard of Wash U 30 years ago, but it's a hot school now.
As far as your point about NE SLACs, I'd say it depends on the school -- Williams and Amherst definitely have national reputations; Middlebury, Bowdoin and Wesleyan somewhat less so, but they're certainly not unknown. I'm a native Californian who went to one of these schools, so I speak with some experience on this point.
In general, though, when you consider a school's reputation or prestige, you need to define your terms -- do you mean bumper sticker cred? recognition by grad school admissions committees (if so, in which field)? value in searching for a first job (again, if so, in which field)? alum network? For example: UMD computer science has a national reputation that far exceeds some other programs/departments. So, CS grads have plenty of job offers and an advantage in grad school applications. Additionally, they're building a strong alum network. But the bumper sticker might not mean a lot to most folks in Mountain View or Austin . . . yet. (For the record, I have no connection whatsoever to UMD, but my cousin recruits CS grads for Google.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are schools similar to Wake in terms of admissions and reputation?
Vanderbilt and Washington & Lee in the South.
How would you rank those 3, prestige wise.
Vanderbuilt, WF, W & L
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:William and Mary is better.
Now THAT is funny! Look at the rankings and the campus and the education.
+100
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:William and Mary is better.
Now THAT is funny! Look at the rankings and the campus and the education.
Anonymous wrote:William and Mary is better.
Anonymous wrote:The rep is that Wake Forest is easier of the top schools to get in but once you're in, the work is overwhelming. I can't imagine it's worth the extra cost over and above in state W&M if your kid likes both schools.
Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure if there are statistics to back this up, but it seems to me that Wake Forrest is becoming one of the most popular private schools destinations for kids from the DMV.
Anonymous wrote:Can anyone compare Wake to William and Mary? We got the sense on the tour that Wake was particularly strong with out placement (careers, internships). But would it be worth turning down in state tuition at WM? I think these two schools are DC's top choices. I am inclined to encourage DC to do ED at WM because I don't see any reason why Wake would be worth the extra cost (DC does value the air conditioned dorms at Wake, though!)
Anonymous wrote:Can anyone compare Wake to William and Mary? We got the sense on the tour that Wake was particularly strong with out placement (careers, internships). But would it be worth turning down in state tuition at WM? I think these two schools are DC's top choices. I am inclined to encourage DC to do ED at WM because I don't see any reason why Wake would be worth the extra cost (DC does value the air conditioned dorms at Wake, though!)