Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Maybe she wears skin tight because that's what feels best to her. Maybe she wants to look sexy for men. Either case, what a woman wears is her choice, as long as what she is wearing is not blatantly lewd indecent exposure. A case of "camel toe" is not indecent exposure because the crotch is covered, and it is not lewd because the form of the female body is not lewd.
So bikinis are ok at CitiZen? Awesome!
Nudity is not legal, and exposed skin is something more easily regulated than tight fitting clothing. According to what I've read, "camel toe" is caused not wearing underwear with tight pants. Some women go sans underwear because they think it feels better, some actually want to get camel toe. To camel toe or not to camel toe has actually become a matter of fashion preference.
But what are we going to do about it? Pass a law saying women have to wear underwear? Maybe we could hire an army of morality policemen whose job it is is to arrest any woman who looks like she might have camel toe, and check to make sure she's wearing her undies. But if we consider the form of the female body to be obscene, maybe we could just ban pants on women altogether, and force them back under skirts. And heck, why stop there? The extremists believe the sight of a woman's arm is erotic, so we should probably throw burqas over all of them.
I think we should just quit being offended by the female form. If women want to wear revealing tights, let 'em. If it bothers you so much, learn to divert your eyes from the offending area.