Anonymous wrote:I am waiting to hear "footage" was suddenly lost
Anonymous wrote:Child support doesn't hinge on whether or not the parents were married. What she pays him seems fair considering her income. I bet her legal challenges have costs him hundreds of thousands of dollars in lawyers' fees. To me the leech could be Olivier. He's been hooking up with movie starts for years ... Not sure what the ladies see in him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Moving her daughter to another country doesn't seem crazy to me. She's not with the father anymore, so what's the problem? He can visit. How is she crazy?
Now that's not fair and you know it. It is a big deal for either parent. It is a big deal for Kelly Rutherford when her ex's allowed to keep the kids in France.
The father isn't some destitute guy with no means to get to France. He can afford to fly there. He's a model so it's not like he has only 4 weeks of vacation time a year. The only thing stopping him from visiting is if he doesn't want to go. Doesn't he live in Canada or something? Even if she stayed in LA, he's still not in the same country. I think you're using the "crazy" in a different way than what I'm used to. I was wondering if she did something really nuts. It doesn't seems so to me.
Actually. he is not very well off.
The dad (Aubry) actually makes $500K a year from modeling - I remember reading that a couple of places when they divorced. Is he rich, no, but he's certainly well off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is she moving to France b/c the papparazi laws are more strict?
Why not just move out of LA - Bruce and Demi Moore raised the kids in ID, the Afflecks are raising the kids in Boston, Nick Lachey is raising Camden in OH, etc. There are other places that are more of out the spotlight (and probably more husband-material there too).
Trust me noone is chasing Nick Lachey. I think he can only afford to live in Ohio.
Anonymous wrote:Is she moving to France b/c the papparazi laws are more strict?
Why not just move out of LA - Bruce and Demi Moore raised the kids in ID, the Afflecks are raising the kids in Boston, Nick Lachey is raising Camden in OH, etc. There are other places that are more of out the spotlight (and probably more husband-material there too).
Anonymous wrote:Is she moving to France b/c the papparazi laws are more strict?
Why not just move out of LA - Bruce and Demi Moore raised the kids in ID, the Afflecks are raising the kids in Boston, Nick Lachey is raising Camden in OH, etc. There are other places that are more of out the spotlight (and probably more husband-material there too).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Moving her daughter to another country doesn't seem crazy to me. She's not with the father anymore, so what's the problem? He can visit. How is she crazy?
Now that's not fair and you know it. It is a big deal for either parent. It is a big deal for Kelly Rutherford when her ex's allowed to keep the kids in France.
The father isn't some destitute guy with no means to get to France. He can afford to fly there. He's a model so it's not like he has only 4 weeks of vacation time a year. The only thing stopping him from visiting is if he doesn't want to go. Doesn't he live in Canada or something? Even if she stayed in LA, he's still not in the same country. I think you're using the "crazy" in a different way than what I'm used to. I was wondering if she did something really nuts. It doesn't seems so to me.
Actually. he is not very well off.