Anonymous wrote:^ YY's second track is for Chinese, isn't it, not English, but we take your point. Brent parent interested in BASIS here. Our school has essentially been tracking for math and English in the upper grades (kids taught the same subject in separate classrooms by different teachers during the same scheduling block). If younger Brent kids move onto public middle schools where they are thrown into English classes with kids who struggle, you can bet that a new generation of parents is going to fight back, being it at Basis, Stuart Hobson, Deal or new schools that pop up (e.g. DCI at Walter Reed).
Anonymous wrote: Basis is hiring a remedial English teacher, which they don't do in Arizona, because they've found that too many kids lack grade-level reading and writing skills to handle their curiculum.
Anonymous wrote:I thought now we're all supposed to have diverse schools and classrooms, and we don't label anyone TAG anymore. We just wait until MS & HS and then let them take advanced classes. (At least we can still do that, right? And not have the teacher instructing both Calculus and Pre-Algebra in the same room in the name of "differentiated instruction"?)
My point being, if that is correct (which I'm not saying that it is - I'm just asking) it seems that there are two hurdles to clear. The Ed Policy types will be all about the anti-labeling and anti-tracking as it is out-of-fashion in academic circles. That's in addition to the local political fall-out, which we are all already familiar with.
Or am I wrong?
Anonymous wrote:It is ridiculous 11:28 but with Basis tracking not only for middle school math but for English (not clear for which grades yet) and 8th grade science, Latin and Deal, and maybe even Stuart Hobson and Hardy, will come under pressure to follow suit within 2 or 3 years. Watch for it. Competition, the American way![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, since BASIS hasn't been open long enough to have administered their famous comps, we have no idea if they *should* have kids "doing" Algebra II or Pre-Calc in 8th grade.
Mostly, the BASIS PR machine needs to slow itself down until it can prove it's a good school. Right now, it can't.
Nonsense. The eight kids in Algebra II this year (ranging from 6th to 8th grade) are all doing well. Most, if not all, will pass the comp.
Stop right there. TMI. The only people who would, or should, know this much detail on the 8 kids are teachers or staff. It is unprofessional and inappropriate to post this type of comment with easily identifiable information. If PP I'd a parent, then this is speculation. And also irresponsible.
Find another way to boost.
I'm a parent, not the teacher. The Algebra II teacher stated clearly at the start of the year that he reserves the right to send kids who are not doing well back to Algebra I. No kids were sent back to Algebra I after the first grading period. Also, DC reports on how other kids are doing. Finally, I'm pretty sure that off of the Algebra II kids in DC's class (half the class) made the "90%" club and the Honor Roll.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, since BASIS hasn't been open long enough to have administered their famous comps, we have no idea if they *should* have kids "doing" Algebra II or Pre-Calc in 8th grade.
Mostly, the BASIS PR machine needs to slow itself down until it can prove it's a good school. Right now, it can't.
Nonsense. The eight kids in Algebra II this year (ranging from 6th to 8th grade) are all doing well. Most, if not all, will pass the comp.
Stop right there. TMI. The only people who would, or should, know this much detail on the 8 kids are teachers or staff. It is unprofessional and inappropriate to post this type of comment with easily identifiable information. If PP I'd a parent, then this is speculation. And also irresponsible.
Find another way to boost.