Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Are you living in iran , no one is taking away or wants to be involved with your vagina. you are very obsessed to think the world rotates around your vagina.
You are a simpleton that cannot see around your vagina and can't see or understanding bigger and more crucial issues that really exist.
____________________________________
Actually, unfortunately it is the Republicans who seem to be obsessed with the vagina. But keep trying to blame the victims, it's so consistent with the rest of your platform.
Please ask the Republicans to focus soley on the bigger and more crucial issues that really exist.
I'm not sure they really care about my vagina one way or the other, but they sure as hell want to ram their religion down my throat! Though Romney will barely mention the name of his due to the other religious nutjobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:and maybe I don't mean persuade, but at least make me understand why you might feel the way you do. I don't have to agree, but I'd like to at least feel like it's a rational, understandable decision to vote republican this year.
Just curious: what % of voters do you think vote based on actual platforms, policies, etc., rather than political party, single issues or height/hair/good looks of the candidates?
I'm sure a disappointingly large number (as evidenced by my facebook news feed). But I'm looking to hear from the few percent who really are voting on actual policies and I'm wondering what those policies are and why they think they are better than what Obama stands for.
Well that's a different question entirely. One I can't help you with because I'm a white, well-educated, new rich, usually Republican voter who doesn't want to see more and more of my hard-earned money being taken by Democrats and going to God-knows-what and not doing much good. And, yes, I'm a woman and I have daughters.
Anonymous wrote:I think Paul Ryan and Akin are facsists. It's very scary stuff. Just think if Paul Ryan became president. It's just as scary as Palin in the last election.
The middle class has to stop being so passive. We're letting the crazies grab the power.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:and maybe I don't mean persuade, but at least make me understand why you might feel the way you do. I don't have to agree, but I'd like to at least feel like it's a rational, understandable decision to vote republican this year.
Just curious: what % of voters do you think vote based on actual platforms, policies, etc., rather than political party, single issues or height/hair/good looks of the candidates?
I'm sure a disappointingly large number (as evidenced by my facebook news feed). But I'm looking to hear from the few percent who really are voting on actual policies and I'm wondering what those policies are and why they think they are better than what Obama stands for.
Well that's a different question entirely. One I can't help you with because I'm a white, well-educated, new rich, usually Republican voter who doesn't want to see more and more of my hard-earned money being taken by Democrats and going to God-knows-what and not doing much good. And, yes, I'm a woman and I have daughters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:and maybe I don't mean persuade, but at least make me understand why you might feel the way you do. I don't have to agree, but I'd like to at least feel like it's a rational, understandable decision to vote republican this year.
Just curious: what % of voters do you think vote based on actual platforms, policies, etc., rather than political party, single issues or height/hair/good looks of the candidates?
I'm sure a disappointingly large number (as evidenced by my facebook news feed). But I'm looking to hear from the few percent who really are voting on actual policies and I'm wondering what those policies are and why they think they are better than what Obama stands for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whoa...good for you, PPs. I felt that strongly when I was younger. Now, "it's the economy, stupid."
Do you have daughters???
It doesn't matter to me how good the economy is if I cannot fully participate in it as a free person. If I am forced to stay pregnant, or forced to feed/house/provide or pay for care for another child, it limits my ability to fully participate in this dream economy of yours. I'm not a big "equal pay" person but one could argue that if the economy discriminates against me, subtly or directly, for being female, for being pregnant, for needing maternity time off or for being a mother, then I am also not free to participate fully in your economy.
If the government passes laws govering my body then I am little better than another piece of property being passed around in this economy.
I'm not willing to condenm my daughter or anyone else's to a life of poverty, a life as a second class citizen, if she makes a mistake and gets knocked up, or if (god forbid) she is a victim of legitimate rape.
And I don't think for one second that these old, white men are unaware of the disadvantage they are placing women at when they make us bear the costs of parenting. I think it's one more way for the white male to maintain his supremacy.
So in a way you are right, it IS the economy, stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:and maybe I don't mean persuade, but at least make me understand why you might feel the way you do. I don't have to agree, but I'd like to at least feel like it's a rational, understandable decision to vote republican this year.
Just curious: what % of voters do you think vote based on actual platforms, policies, etc., rather than political party, single issues or height/hair/good looks of the candidates?
Anonymous wrote:and maybe I don't mean persuade, but at least make me understand why you might feel the way you do. I don't have to agree, but I'd like to at least feel like it's a rational, understandable decision to vote republican this year.
Anonymous wrote:10:36 I am not voting for my President based on my religion. Why are you trying to divide and single out R/R supporters, out of curiosity?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My reasons...
Smaller govt
Less regulation on small businesses
Lower taxes
Restore USA as a world leader and I agree with American exceptionalism... There is no moral equivelency between USA and some other countries.
Enforcement of our immigration laws
No selection by the Admin or Justice Dept on which laws will be upheld.
Someone who can govern with help from across the isle ( romney has a history of governing in a liberal state)
I am pro choice and pretty middle of the road on social issues but I dont vote on those issues. Neither party has everything I support so I am picking the one that has the most
You would not get any of this under R/R. I just don't understand how you republicans fail to see that all they give you is a list of buzz words (see your list of buzz words). YOu elect them into office, and then they do NONE OF THE ABOVE! Bush did not deliver on any of this! Besides lower taxes (especially if you are a 1%er), but you are still enjoying those tax cuts.
Gov't actually GROWS under Republican Administration, and spending increases. Please explain to me why repubs love going to war and having a way-to-big military, but then say they want small gov't and to cut spending. Do you think they used a groupon to pay for those wars???? Our deficit is out of control mostly because of the wars. Yes, it continued to go up under Obama, but that's because we are still at war.
As PP pointed out, Obama has had a record number of deportations while passing the DREAM act to protect the innocent kids.
As for restoring the USA as a world leader... Please go to another country and ask people their opinions on Bush, Obama, and Romney. Oh, and Obama's foreign policy record is bad ass.
Obama tried and tried and tried to reach across the aisle. The GOP congress has been quoted many times as saying that "making Obama a one-term president is the top priority." Somehow he managed to push some amazing policy anyway. Sure, it wasn't ideal that he had to force feed it in some cases, but what else was the guy to do? Sit on hands for 4 years because the bullies won't work with him? He was well within his rights as president to do so. We have a system of checks and balances, not just to keep the prez form having too much power, but also to keep the congress from having too much power. Again, he's bad ass.
Please tell me how Obama has increased regulation on your small business, and be specific. And please read this: http://www.barackobama.com/small-business-owners/accomplishments
Killing Osama is not foreign policy. Here is an article on just a few things that aren't so great.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444914904577615300669832384.html
Other country's opinions of Oba,a are not so great:
"In June, the Pew Research Center released one of its periodic surveys of global opinion. It found that since 2009, favorable attitudes toward the U.S. had slipped nearly everywhere in the world except Russia and, go figure, Japan. George W. Bush was more popular in Egypt in the last year of his presidency than Mr. Obama is today."
Anonymous wrote:
Are you living in iran , no one is taking away or wants to be involved with your vagina. you are very obsessed to think the world rotates around your vagina.
You are a simpleton that cannot see around your vagina and can't see or understanding bigger and more crucial issues that really exist.
____________________________________
Actually, unfortunately it is the Republicans who seem to be obsessed with the vagina. But keep trying to blame the victims, it's so consistent with the rest of your platform.
Please ask the Republicans to focus soley on the bigger and more crucial issues that really exist.