Anonymous wrote:I would add that your child will be fine, and don't worry about her being "Level III." Sometimes nearly half of the kids in Local Level IV are not "center eligible" but are placed in by the principal to fill out the class. These kids generally do very well, and no one can tell the difference performance-wise. Your principal would not have placed your child there if she wasn't considered highly likely to succeed. This is a great opportunity for your child! Congrats!
Ffxmaman wrote:Hi - this is the wrong place to post this, I know, but I/m new here and having trouble searching for the topic I'd love to discuss.
My daughter has been accepted into the Level IV class, but she's Level III. . .can anyone tell me give me a link to chat with other parents in same boat - just would love to know how their children did with the level IV curriculum. Feeling nervous for her...
Thanks so much.
Anonymous wrote:I'm really not sure why people dismiss the cost of extra busing for aap as small. It's quite substantial actually and those funds could certainly be put towards reducing class sizes.
Anonymous wrote:PP: what would you suggest? posting the worst samples? Typical samples? or the best? Of course you try to put the best foot forward.
The thing about AAP is that all of the kids are smart. They can all handle the work. The kids tend to work more independently, which mean the borderline appeals kids will not hold back your snowfluke.
And it does not cost more to have kids in AAP.