Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread makes me want to move back to the Midwest.
This thread makes me want to continue to stay far away from the Midwest.
Good. We don't want you there.
Anonymous wrote:But I do need to defend my friends/relatives that didn't have dancing or alcohol at their receptions - it wasn't an economic decision, but rather a religious one. Their churches frown on these...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread makes me want to move back to the Midwest.
This thread makes me want to continue to stay far away from the Midwest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread makes me want to move back to the Midwest.
This thread makes me want to continue to stay far away from the Midwest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also grew up in the midwest, where we ate at 5 PM every night. Thinking back I'm not sure how that worked out, but I know my dad left for work at around 6, so he probably worked a 7-3 shift, getting him home around 4:00. (Rush hour there is nothing compared to here, but because he's blind, he rode the equivalent of Metro Access, making his trip take MUCH longer than it could have if he drove). Mom ran a daycare out of our house until she went back to school to get her RN, then she worked 11p to 7a or 3p to 11p. When she worked those shifts, dinner was waiting for us in the oven.
I was going to write that depending on where in the midwest you were going, there might not be alcohol or dancing at the reception, even if a full meal were served... shocking, I know ... but I see dancing will be a part of the dessert reception, so there will probably also be alcohol.
But I do need to defend my friends/relatives that didn't have dancing or alcohol at their receptions - it wasn't an economic decision, but rather a religious one. Their churches frown on these...
They also are less likely than east coasters to have guests flying in from all over the world. I kinda wanted our friend who flew home from Moscow for 3 days to have a wonderful time to look forward to. Dessert wouldn't have cut it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll be flying out for a wedding in the midwest in a couple months. I just received the invitation: ceremony is at 6:30pm followed by a "dessert reception" and dancing. Is this a midwest thing?
Must be. I went to a midwestern wedding (Texas) about 2 years ago and there was no real reception - just the ceremony and then a dinner followed by one bride/groom dance and a parents dance. But no get-down and party reception or anything, no rented facility.
Texas isn't "midwest"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwestern_United_States
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also grew up in the midwest, where we ate at 5 PM every night. Thinking back I'm not sure how that worked out, but I know my dad left for work at around 6, so he probably worked a 7-3 shift, getting him home around 4:00. (Rush hour there is nothing compared to here, but because he's blind, he rode the equivalent of Metro Access, making his trip take MUCH longer than it could have if he drove). Mom ran a daycare out of our house until she went back to school to get her RN, then she worked 11p to 7a or 3p to 11p. When she worked those shifts, dinner was waiting for us in the oven.
I was going to write that depending on where in the midwest you were going, there might not be alcohol or dancing at the reception, even if a full meal were served... shocking, I know ... but I see dancing will be a part of the dessert reception, so there will probably also be alcohol.
But I do need to defend my friends/relatives that didn't have dancing or alcohol at their receptions - it wasn't an economic decision, but rather a religious one. Their churches frown on these...
They also are less likely than east coasters to have guests flying in from all over the world. I kinda wanted our friend who flew home from Moscow for 3 days to have a wonderful time to look forward to. Dessert wouldn't have cut it.
Anonymous wrote:This thread makes me want to move back to the Midwest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It makes the wedding less of an event and shorter, because people aren't going to stay from 6:30 until midnight without eating dinner.
Why? You eat beforehand, not after.
I'm not hungry for dinner at 4:30. You have to get your hair, makeup, etc. done and travel to the church, so it's not like you can start eating at 5:30 and be at the ceremony at 6:30.
why can't you eat dinner with your hair and makeup done? Do them at 4 and eat at 5. It's not rocket science.
Gee, I don't know. Why would I put lipstick on before I ate? I just think the bride and groom could have been more considerate of their guests. In reality, most midwestern punch and cookies receptions, those without live music, don't last long, so it's not a big deal.
Anonymous wrote:Good grief, have a light dinner at 530. Not that hard and not that outrageous a time to be eating either. Who wants to go to an event that STARTS at 8 pm just so you can have your precious evening meal at 630 instead of eating a bit earlier. This day is about the bride and groom. Not you and your dinner schedule.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They just do things differently in the Midwest. It is a regoinal thing. I married into a family there and there are always these little differences and quirks and things when we visit out there. It's just different strokes for different folks.
Nope. The well off in the midwest do throw sit down dinner and dancing receptions.