Anonymous wrote:The suggestion of having Brent and Maury feed into SH was put forth at a meeting I attended with Brent parents about five years ago. The Brent parents at that time rejected that idea outright, as they wanted DCPS to get Jefferson's Academy going for them to feed into. I don't know any "Clusters crazies" who would not be thrilled to have SH be a destination school for Brent and Maury.
Regarding OOB numbers, while SH may have a lot of OOB, they are from a lot of families within the next boundary over. But there are pockets of high OOB numbers at the most popular middle schools, Hardy being probably the most with OOB, and their renovation cost $45 million.
If you also look at the numbers for renovation dollars, Eliot-Hine is scheduled to get a significant reno in 2013-2014 ($38m, I think). All of the money is already in the budget and committed to all of these schools, so it's not that one school will get money and the others get that amount subtracted. And if that were to happen, why wouldn't we all rise up against that being allowed anyway? Why can Ward 2/3 get many hundreds of millions to renovate two middle schools and a high school, while Ward 6 has to fight and scrape to renovate our two middles into schools that the 1000+ students in the upcoming middle school bubble on the hill could fill? The population numbers are such that we could support all of these schools, just like in NW.
I like the idea that SH could be a Hardy model, smaller middle school, EH can become the larger Deal type model and both schools feed Eastern to make it the Wilson of Ward 6-a comprehensive, strong high school with lots of course offerings and tons of extracurriculars. But with all this bickering and pitting people against each other and people suggesting that SH just be combined with EH, I fear that may never happen...
Anonymous wrote:
Which also, goes to show you that Friendship really thought out the process on how to market their school. When they first opened up the high-school portion, they recruited the top Principal from Banneker at the time Ms. Adams and from that point on Friendship has not "wanted" for anything in regards to academics, athletics and activities.
Anonymous wrote:Don't know why you say it can't happen to 2 MSs in Ward 6. The two feeder schools to Wilson, Deal & Hardy both got expensive renovations.
Anonymous wrote:Ward Six has ~325 of its kids in middle school. Deal is bursting at the seams with enrollment projected to be 1,300 next year. Hardy has over 500 students and has plenty of room to grow within a facility designed to accommodate a middle school If you were on the Council would you give $34 million X 3 to Ward Six and its severly underutilized schools? Of if you would only give it to two schools, which ones (Eliot Hine, Stuart Hobson or Jefferson)? Keep in mind Stuart Hobson has the fewest number of Ward Six residents. Keep in mind that Eliot Hine and Jefferson are proper middle schools, while Stuart Hobson is a retrofitted elementary school wedged into a residential area. Keep in mind that Stuart Hobson a mile from Eliot Hine.
If Stuart Hobson get is its $34 million, do you think Eliot Hine and Jefferson will get another $34 million a piece? What makes you think the Council will look favorably upon giving Ward Six all this money?
Anonymous wrote:Besides PP's accurate assessment of the situation, writing something like this completely ignores the fact that the city budget is obviously in a different place than when those renovations were approved and undertaken, still rolling in tax dollars from years of income and property tax growth.
Anonymous wrote:Another problem with the naive analogy above is that Stuart-Hobson, as part of a school cluster model long past its prime, has purposefully branded itself as serving a select few, namely the Capitol Hill Cluster School. Of course the reality is different but the advocating constituents are part of that very narrow base of insiders. So it's really hard for everyone else in Ward 6 (and that's most of us waiting for a decent middle school option) to be told for years "that's our school" and "why would anyone else have a say in it but us". And now all of a sudden it should be in everybody's interest to invest in it, quite likely even at the expense of our own future. We can all talk that talk ("sure, why can't there be both, live and let live"), including our Council Member, but you don't need to do more than one step behind the scenes and the reality is different.
The saddest part is that no one will have the political courage to provide some sort of leadership that goes beyond promising everybody everything and doing nothing in the process!
Anonymous wrote:1/2 of SH's students come from Ward 7 & 8. It only serves a few actual residents of Ward 6.
If the principal could fill the seats with Brent and Maury students, SH would be a very different place, very quickly. After several years of lackluster leadership, I'm curious to see what this new principal will do.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think they will actually go there, but they will feed to one orvthe other depending on the permanent location of SWS. The official FAQ that came to SWS parents from DCPS last week made it clear that the expanded SWS will not feed to Stuart Hobson.
Logan feeds to Eliot Hine. I believe only the leading class has the.option to go to Stuart Hobson. Then, no more.