Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again missed the point. This also gets boring.
Right, but you seem incapable of articulating your "point." You seem to offer nothing more than insults and babble. What exactly is your point?
Scroll back a few pages and you find it in gory detail, in prompt response to your previous request (the one offering little but insults is you, of course).
More specificity please. What's the timestamp on a post with your point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again missed the point. This also gets boring.
Right, but you seem incapable of articulating your "point." You seem to offer nothing more than insults and babble. What exactly is your point?
Scroll back a few pages and you find it in gory detail, in prompt response to your previous request (the one offering little but insults is you, of course).
More specificity please. What's the timestamp on a post with your point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again missed the point. This also gets boring.
Right, but you seem incapable of articulating your "point." You seem to offer nothing more than insults and babble. What exactly is your point?
Scroll back a few pages and you find it in gory detail, in prompt response to your previous request (the one offering little but insults is you, of course).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again missed the point. This also gets boring.
Right, but you seem incapable of articulating your "point." You seem to offer nothing more than insults and babble. What exactly is your point?
Anonymous wrote:Again missed the point. This also gets boring.
Anonymous wrote:My kids are not old enough to prep for the PSAT, but they will someday. You are comparing apples and oranges. The SAT, PSAT etc. are tests that not only allow, but encourage prepping and taking sample tests. The WPPSI, WISC etc. are IQ tests that do not sanction the kind of prepping that they consider cheating, i.e. taking the test multiple times in one year or purchasing the exam. Honestly, however, I am done trying to explain this to you. You clearly do not understand the difference between a College Bard exam and an IQ test. It is boring to try to educate the stubborn, and you will keep posting until you are satisfied that others approve of your approach to prep. You will have to get validation from someone else.
I think you might be the original gilded nincompoop with all your purple prose. When you never say anything useful, but just spout off clever witticisms, you reveal yourself an idiot. Give it a rest already.
Lots of assumptions there. Signed, a poster who did not prep her kids, is not rich, believes it is unethical and counterproductive to cheat on the WPPSI, and sent her kids to a tiny, play-based preschool where nearly every child continues on to public. There were no adverse effects--my kids went on to a great independent school where they are thriving. Oh, and hey, they too learned how to read, multiply and divide without the years of toddler cramming. But if I had spent all that time doing that, I would probably want to try to justify those efforts too. Sigh...
Anonymous wrote:Why then do all these gilded nincompoops strut around like peacocks bragging their children do not "prep"? And their kids are in special private pre-Ks that prep these kids for years in advance of the WPPSIor PSAT. Hilarious. Then like Supreme Court Judges they accusingly crow cheating, immoral and unethical epithets at parents simply parenting their children. The rich want to get richer (and go to private school) and they want the poor to stay poor and go to public school.