Anonymous wrote:Outhouse is utility. String is passive aggressive douche.
Anonymous wrote:Outhouse is utility. String is passive aggressive douche.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't see the problem with your neighbor marking her yard with string. Have you seen the damage construction workers can do to a yard? Who cares if you brought in her mail, etc. That was very nice of you, but the marking of her yard has nothing to do with you - it has to do with the workers. BFD.
And unless you were prepared to pay for reconstruction of her lawn (not cheap), you might want to be grateful she did this.
OP, did you converse with your neighbors one-on-one to talk about your plans before you proceeded down the Bureaucratic Road and did everything "right?" Because, if you skipped this neighborly step or trying to get their buy-in, address their concerns at the front-end, you may have avoided these kinds of conflicts after-the-fact.
Their "buy-in" for my legal right to do whatever is in the bounds of the law to do with my own property? Sorry, that is not happening. WHen we did our renovation, we TOLD them we were doing X, Y, and Z, thanking them for being patient and to let us know if there were problems (there were not).
And, you all are being a bit overdramatic about the yard. It does not cost that much. BTDT. Yes, it is a nuisance and if there was damage, OP should pay for it. But, the neighbor's behavior was absolutely passive-aggressive.
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't see the problem with your neighbor marking her yard with string. Have you seen the damage construction workers can do to a yard? Who cares if you brought in her mail, etc. That was very nice of you, but the marking of her yard has nothing to do with you - it has to do with the workers. BFD.
And unless you were prepared to pay for reconstruction of her lawn (not cheap), you might want to be grateful she did this.
OP, did you converse with your neighbors one-on-one to talk about your plans before you proceeded down the Bureaucratic Road and did everything "right?" Because, if you skipped this neighborly step or trying to get their buy-in, address their concerns at the front-end, you may have avoided these kinds of conflicts after-the-fact.
Their "buy-in" for my legal right to do whatever is in the bounds of the law to do with my own property? Sorry, that is not happening. WHen we did our renovation, we TOLD them we were doing X, Y, and Z, thanking them for being patient and to let us know if there were problems (there were not).
And, you all are being a bit overdramatic about the yard. It does not cost that much. BTDT. Yes, it is a nuisance and if there was damage, OP should pay for it. But, the neighbor's behavior was absolutely passive-aggressive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't see the problem with your neighbor marking her yard with string. Have you seen the damage construction workers can do to a yard? Who cares if you brought in her mail, etc. That was very nice of you, but the marking of her yard has nothing to do with you - it has to do with the workers. BFD.
And unless you were prepared to pay for reconstruction of her lawn (not cheap), you might want to be grateful she did this.
OP, did you converse with your neighbors one-on-one to talk about your plans before you proceeded down the Bureaucratic Road and did everything "right?" Because, if you skipped this neighborly step or trying to get their buy-in, address their concerns at the front-end, you may have avoided these kinds of conflicts after-the-fact.
Anonymous wrote:I don't see the problem with your neighbor marking her yard with string. Have you seen the damage construction workers can do to a yard? Who cares if you brought in her mail, etc. That was very nice of you, but the marking of her yard has nothing to do with you - it has to do with the workers. BFD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That said, drainage issues are very expensive and aggravating. Our lovely neighbors regraded and set up their drainage with river rocks and all to drain into our backyard. Bastards! This is apparently not illegal. We spoke to them and they told us we should just regrade. Don't even get me started
Yup, my neighbor did the same to us. Asked my husband if it was "ok" to drain the water off his roof and house towards our property AFTER the guys had put in the drainage pipe. When we asked him to please reroute towards the ditch in front, he said it had already been done!
Ay yi yi. Thank you for at least posting this so I know I am not the only one with crappy neighbors. Our neighbors also had the option to drain toward their backyard and beyond which woukld not cause issues for anyone, but it was more work.
Same as you, there WAS another option, which would have involved more time and money. The neighbor didn't want to go this route and now his water is aimed at my yard. As I said, he asked us if it was ok, after the work was done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It's all about ME ME ME and more ME And how does it affect ME.
This is hilarious! Yes, OP, it's all about YOU YOU YOU - and you don't even see it!
hmmm. I think the OP can do what she wants to on her property. The neighbors are the ones who are being difficult. When you choose to live in a neighborhood (with presumably smaller lots), you are accepting that certain inconveniences may occasionally take place due to such a living environment. Your rights are protected through the HOA. Otherwise, shut up and deal.
You forgot to applaud the OP's next-door neighbor, who has the identical right to put up a piece of string on her own property (and to engage in lawn-care practices that don't meet the OP's high standards).
I don't care about the lawncare practices so long as the HOA doesn't have legit rules about regular mowing, etc. But the string thing just seems petty. It is not really exercising your private property rights but more just being a dick.
Shut up and deal.