Anonymous wrote:How did a 13 year old thread get resurrected?
Anonymous wrote:Andrea Mitchell is 64. She looks 64.
Pelosi looks very good mostly because of a wig (I believe she wears a wig)
Anonymous wrote:It's hard to evaluate surgery with one's conception of natural. This is exactly why these women are getting surgery, so they don't look natural. But Andrea Mitchell's face is attractive and when she talks, all her facial parts move. It helps that she has great hair.
Yes,Anonymous wrote:I think she looks great. But I seem to remember her as having dark, poorly styled hair and bad skin The person I'm thinking of was a reporter, that I remember. Anyone know?
Anonymous wrote:My FIL saw Andrea Mitchell at a wedding about 10 years ago and said she had horrible skin. Guess the camera hides that. I think she looks much older than 64 - surprised to hear she was that young.
Anonymous wrote:She's 64 and looks great, but not all tight and pulled and unnatural.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are the age we are and I think older women who do not dye their hair, have plastic surgery are beautiful just as they are. Jamie Lee Curtis is beautiful and she accepts her age. If I were a man I would find maturity in a woman a plus.
Ladies, we will never be free until we stop trying to look 18 when we are 40.
No, you wouldn't! Men like youth, like it or not.
Anonymous wrote:She looks MUCH older than 64. So, by definition (assuming she wants to look young) NOT successful.