Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone saying OP should "host" e.g. pay for meals for all her friends who have husbands etc? There is clear wealth disparity between her and her married friends who are married to bankers. I would never expect a friend who lives in a crappy studio cover my and my husband's restaurant check under any conditions
The way to show hospitality to your friends for cheap is to cook something inexpensive. OP has ruled that out. Her friends are apparently regularly feeding her. She should reciprocate in some manner. Also, she did not say money was the issue here.
It does sound to me that she reciprocates within her means - bearings wine and gifts to their events. I wouldn’t expect much from someone much poorer than myself
She said nothing about money being the issue for her. And do you think people who aren't rich don't host or cook? Tons of people host in their 20s from studio apartments. And there's not a chair shortage out there in the world, you can get some more chairs if that's the issue. Put a curtain up if you don't want people to see your bed. If you want to reciprocate your friends hosting and cooking for you, you will find a way of doing that.
How useless. No I wouldn't host in such a small space. How miserable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone saying OP should "host" e.g. pay for meals for all her friends who have husbands etc? There is clear wealth disparity between her and her married friends who are married to bankers. I would never expect a friend who lives in a crappy studio cover my and my husband's restaurant check under any conditions
The way to show hospitality to your friends for cheap is to cook something inexpensive. OP has ruled that out. Her friends are apparently regularly feeding her. She should reciprocate in some manner. Also, she did not say money was the issue here.
It does sound to me that she reciprocates within her means - bearings wine and gifts to their events. I wouldn’t expect much from someone much poorer than myself
Did she say she was much poorer than the others?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone saying OP should "host" e.g. pay for meals for all her friends who have husbands etc? There is clear wealth disparity between her and her married friends who are married to bankers. I would never expect a friend who lives in a crappy studio cover my and my husband's restaurant check under any conditions
The way to show hospitality to your friends for cheap is to cook something inexpensive. OP has ruled that out. Her friends are apparently regularly feeding her. She should reciprocate in some manner. Also, she did not say money was the issue here.
It does sound to me that she reciprocates within her means - bearings wine and gifts to their events. I wouldn’t expect much from someone much poorer than myself
She said nothing about money being the issue for her. And do you think people who aren't rich don't host or cook? Tons of people host in their 20s from studio apartments. And there's not a chair shortage out there in the world, you can get some more chairs if that's the issue. Put a curtain up if you don't want people to see your bed. If you want to reciprocate your friends hosting and cooking for you, you will find a way of doing that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:By host she means pay. It costs a lot of money to have people over. Host in a bar and pick up the tab.
Why bar? Why pay for overpriced toxic drinks? Why not casual hole in the wall type restaurants.
You are splitting hairs. Literally anywhere. Doesn't have to be a bar. I happen to like over priced cocktails, but if someone else was paying, I'd drink rail.
Anonymous wrote:We’re in our late 20s and I’m the only one in our DC friend group that doesn’t live with a partner & lives in a 400 square foot studio downtown. I also work a pretty demanding media job where I don’t have evenings open so I rarely cook for myself or anyone else. I also don’t have seating for more than 3 people, have a huge office set up in my apartment and super limited space, so when I initiate plans for everyone I usually make restaurant reservations.
Also I’m frankly busy & have limited time to date because of my job so I love going out to restaurants and actually want to enjoy my free time
One of my married friends keeps bringing up that I never host which is bizarre because I do initiate plans as frequently as anyone else- but all of them have balconies, actual tables and kitchens with dishwashers ect and enough space for everyone. Can she not read a room and understand why I wouldn’t want a ton of people in my tiny apartment or am I the dramatic one?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:By host she means pay. It costs a lot of money to have people over. Host in a bar and pick up the tab.
Why bar? Why pay for overpriced toxic drinks? Why not casual hole in the wall type restaurants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone saying OP should "host" e.g. pay for meals for all her friends who have husbands etc? There is clear wealth disparity between her and her married friends who are married to bankers. I would never expect a friend who lives in a crappy studio cover my and my husband's restaurant check under any conditions
The way to show hospitality to your friends for cheap is to cook something inexpensive. OP has ruled that out. Her friends are apparently regularly feeding her. She should reciprocate in some manner. Also, she did not say money was the issue here.
It does sound to me that she reciprocates within her means - bearings wine and gifts to their events. I wouldn’t expect much from someone much poorer than myself
Anonymous wrote:Assuming this was OP upthread:
“Also should note money is no object for anyone else in this group. Each individual makes over 150k a year”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The responses here are sort of astounding.
Her friends behavior is a classic boundary violation. It amazes me that so many people are missing this. The OP has a boundary that she doesn’t like to host dinners in her apartment. It is her life. She gets to decide that.
The friend can decide whether she wants to have a reciprocal boundary — not hanging out with her anymore because of it. It is her life. She gets to decide that.
But it is absolutely a boundary violation for the friend to force the OP to do things that the OP doesn’t want to do. The OP also doesn’t need a good reason either — it can simply be her preference.
My wife and I never host people at our house for dinners. It is not our thing at all. We even have a big house — not a small apartment There is nothing wrong with that.
100% on target. Make your boundary crystal clear and then drop the rope.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone saying OP should "host" e.g. pay for meals for all her friends who have husbands etc? There is clear wealth disparity between her and her married friends who are married to bankers. I would never expect a friend who lives in a crappy studio cover my and my husband's restaurant check under any conditions
The way to show hospitality to your friends for cheap is to cook something inexpensive. OP has ruled that out. Her friends are apparently regularly feeding her. She should reciprocate in some manner. Also, she did not say money was the issue here.
It does sound to me that she reciprocates within her means - bearings wine and gifts to their events. I wouldn’t expect much from someone much poorer than myself
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone saying OP should "host" e.g. pay for meals for all her friends who have husbands etc? There is clear wealth disparity between her and her married friends who are married to bankers. I would never expect a friend who lives in a crappy studio cover my and my husband's restaurant check under any conditions
The way to show hospitality to your friends for cheap is to cook something inexpensive. OP has ruled that out. Her friends are apparently regularly feeding her. She should reciprocate in some manner. Also, she did not say money was the issue here.