Anonymous wrote:None of you is "offended" by the custom because you're feminists. You're offended because you either have daughters and don't feel like paying or because your own parents didn't pay for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have daughters. No sons. We’ve paid for three very nice weddings (mid 5 figures and up) without expecting anything from the grooms’ families and have been fine with it.
OP here. WHY are you okay with it? That's my question. Dig deep here if you can. I understand its history, but why would you continue a tradition so out of touch with the realities of today? Are you afraid of looking cheap? And fwiw, we have the means to pay for the wedding (mid 5 figures and up), but we'll give exactly as much as the groom's family will. My daughter is not an offering to the other family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have daughters. No sons. We’ve paid for three very nice weddings (mid 5 figures and up) without expecting anything from the grooms’ families and have been fine with it.
OP here. WHY are you okay with it? That's my question. Dig deep here if you can. I understand its history, but why would you continue a tradition so out of touch with the realities of today? Are you afraid of looking cheap? And fwiw, we have the means to pay for the wedding (mid 5 figures and up), but we'll give exactly as much as the groom's family will. My daughter is not an offering to the other family.
Do you only have one child? I had a lovely wedding, but my inlaws only paid $300 for the rehearsal dinner food. We hadn't known they'd pay anything so we had done a very inexpensive rehearsal dinner where we cooked everything ourselves (we were 24 and broke). If my parents had only paid $300 I would have been hurt because they paid $X for my sibling's wedding. It was my inlaws though, so I couldn't say anything. My inlaws did pay 40k or so for their DD's wedding. Frankly $300 hadn't covered their plate at my wedding and was less than most of my aunts and uncles gave.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brides paying for weddings was from the days when women did not work and the husband was responsible for all the financial load after the wedding.
This.
ZERO reason for bride’s family to pay for the wedding. ZERO. ZE-RO. And grooms’ parents who don’t pay their fair share are cheap free-riders.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have daughters. No sons. We’ve paid for three very nice weddings (mid 5 figures and up) without expecting anything from the grooms’ families and have been fine with it.
OP here. WHY are you okay with it? That's my question. Dig deep here if you can. I understand its history, but why would you continue a tradition so out of touch with the realities of today? Are you afraid of looking cheap? And fwiw, we have the means to pay for the wedding (mid 5 figures and up), but we'll give exactly as much as the groom's family will. My daughter is not an offering to the other family.