Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This whole “Feb” thing isn’t going to happen. It’s just the Northeastern strategy that Middlebury has kept around longer than needed because of their poor financial situation. They want to maximize the amount of families they’re squeezing tuition out of.
It's been happening for decades, so catch up.
Midd's finances are far from poor.
Middlebury College is addressing a projected $14.1 million budget deficit by cutting over $10 million from its annual budget through measures including reducing retirement matches, hiring freezes, and closing the Middlebury Institute of International Studies campus in California by 2027. The crisis, largely stemming from low enrollment at the MIIS campus, has led to staff reductions and protests by faculty, students, and staff.
That seems quite poor to me.
https://www.middleburycampus.com/article/2025/04/middlebury-slashes-budget-by-over-10-million-imposes-partial-hiring-freeze#:~:text=Middlebury%20College%20has%20announced%20a%20series%20of,be%20paused%20with%20minimal%20impact%20on%20students.
Anonymous wrote:Hate on Colby all you want - they're crushing it, and their admissions tactics are serving them well.
Anonymous wrote:This whole “Feb” thing isn’t going to happen. It’s just the Northeastern strategy that Middlebury has kept around longer than needed because of their poor financial situation. They want to maximize the amount of families they’re squeezing tuition out of.
Anonymous wrote:The "Midd" boosters are coming in hot. If your school's shorthand name is literally pronounced "mid," then you can't convince me the school isn't mid lol.
Anonymous wrote:Amherst and Williams received record breaking numbers of 18,000 and 17,000 for class of 2030. Are they gaming the system like Colby, of course not. These Middlebury boosters can not explain multiple declines in applications recently.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This whole “Feb” thing isn’t going to happen. It’s just the Northeastern strategy that Middlebury has kept around longer than needed because of their poor financial situation. They want to maximize the amount of families they’re squeezing tuition out of.
It's been happening for decades, so catch up.
Midd's finances are far from poor.
Anonymous wrote:This whole “Feb” thing isn’t going to happen. It’s just the Northeastern strategy that Middlebury has kept around longer than needed because of their poor financial situation. They want to maximize the amount of families they’re squeezing tuition out of.
Anonymous wrote:This whole “Feb” thing isn’t going to happen. It’s just the Northeastern strategy that Middlebury has kept around longer than needed because of their poor financial situation. They want to maximize the amount of families they’re squeezing tuition out of.
Anonymous wrote:This whole “Feb” thing isn’t going to happen. It’s just the Northeastern strategy that Middlebury has kept around longer than needed because of their poor financial situation. They want to maximize the amount of families they’re squeezing tuition out of.
Anonymous wrote:So they fill far more than half of their class ED (494 out of 750) ? Is that because of recruited athletes?
Also why are 117 students enrolled in February term - do they have that delayed Spring start term (that NEU, USC, BU, NYU do) too?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This whole “Feb” thing isn’t going to happen. It’s just the Northeastern strategy that Middlebury has kept around longer than needed because of their poor financial situation. They want to maximize the amount of families they’re squeezing tuition out of.
here's the middlebury hater just making up weird claims that make no sense.
Anonymous wrote:This whole “Feb” thing isn’t going to happen. It’s just the Northeastern strategy that Middlebury has kept around longer than needed because of their poor financial situation. They want to maximize the amount of families they’re squeezing tuition out of.