Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would like to benefit from SS in a few years. I spent many years scraping by as a journalist, always paying into the system. Spouse and I are now pretty well set financially, but the thousands each month to which we will be entitled is not just chump change--it will pay for groceries, gas, home repairs, etc. It may even allow our investments to grow untouched, which is important because at least one of us will likely need assisted living.
And you like everyone who has paid in should be entitled to what they earned for sS. It's a program everyone pays into.
Just because you manage to save for retirement doesn't change that.
You paid in to support current retirees. Future workers will pay in to support you as a retiree.
How many times does this need to be repeated.
Anonymous wrote:This doesn’t seem like it will save any money. You basically get the highest benefit by waiting til 70 to take the benefit. Once people know their benefit is capped they’ll just claim earlier. So, yes, they will get a lower annual benefit but they will start getting paid earlier. So unless social security hasn’t properly adjusted the age 70 payout, it doesn’t seem like this would save much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would like to benefit from SS in a few years. I spent many years scraping by as a journalist, always paying into the system. Spouse and I are now pretty well set financially, but the thousands each month to which we will be entitled is not just chump change--it will pay for groceries, gas, home repairs, etc. It may even allow our investments to grow untouched, which is important because at least one of us will likely need assisted living.
And you like everyone who has paid in should be entitled to what they earned for sS. It's a program everyone pays into.
Just because you manage to save for retirement doesn't change that.
You paid in to support current retirees. Future workers will pay in to support you as a retiree.
How many times does this need to be repeated.
I get that. But just because we were high earners and saved does not mean we shouldn't get our "SS support payout" for our retirement. Fact is everyone is entitled to their SS even if they were a higher earner
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are high income and I think we should pay a social security tax on ALL of our earnings, plus have a cap.
Why? I'm from a lower middle class background and have many elderly relatives who only have social security to support them on old age.
So why don't you help them personally if you feel the need?
I came from LMC/MC background and somehow my parents managed to save for retirement. They lived frugally and kept a budget and got a 2nd job if needed. But they now have a decent retirement.
Just don't get how you can expect to only live on SS in retirement. It was never intended for that. It's SUPPLEMENTAL, not "your only retirement plan"
It's not always that simple. DP - for my MIL she always worked minimum wage jobs, and at one point for a husband/ex husband who never paid into the system for her. She simply didn't know better. She had my husband young, barely got a high school diploma and struggled with good choices (she was a lovely person who I loved deeply). She got early onset dementia (as in her 60's) and we helped what we could but we didn't have a high income, special needs child and other issues. We were struggling ourselves. We eventually figured it out, moved her to us, I couldn't work to care for her and the kids (my income wasn't high enough) and eventually it got bad enough the only option was long-term care medicaid.
Many people live paycheck to paycheck and cannot save. My MIL had almost nothing materially and didn't eat well/proper nutrition to save money. I had to go out and buy her all the basics when she came to us. She never had more than a few outfits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would like to benefit from SS in a few years. I spent many years scraping by as a journalist, always paying into the system. Spouse and I are now pretty well set financially, but the thousands each month to which we will be entitled is not just chump change--it will pay for groceries, gas, home repairs, etc. It may even allow our investments to grow untouched, which is important because at least one of us will likely need assisted living.
And you like everyone who has paid in should be entitled to what they earned for sS. It's a program everyone pays into.
Just because you manage to save for retirement doesn't change that.
You paid in to support current retirees. Future workers will pay in to support you as a retiree.
How many times does this need to be repeated.
Anonymous wrote:I’d be at peace with this if the program were solvent again. It’s not great to pay more and get a lower return, but it’s more important not to have seniors destitute. I can make other plans. The nice lady who bags my groceries really can’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would like to benefit from SS in a few years. I spent many years scraping by as a journalist, always paying into the system. Spouse and I are now pretty well set financially, but the thousands each month to which we will be entitled is not just chump change--it will pay for groceries, gas, home repairs, etc. It may even allow our investments to grow untouched, which is important because at least one of us will likely need assisted living.
And you like everyone who has paid in should be entitled to what they earned for sS. It's a program everyone pays into.
Just because you manage to save for retirement doesn't change that.
Anonymous wrote:I would like to benefit from SS in a few years. I spent many years scraping by as a journalist, always paying into the system. Spouse and I are now pretty well set financially, but the thousands each month to which we will be entitled is not just chump change--it will pay for groceries, gas, home repairs, etc. It may even allow our investments to grow untouched, which is important because at least one of us will likely need assisted living.
Anonymous wrote:I make a ridiculous amount of money and I don't consider SS at all. Wish paying into it was voluntary from the beginning. I would have much preferred to have kept that money and invested it on my own.