Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:he needed to take 4 years of a language for most schools in hs.
Nonsense. Only the very most selective schools care about 4 years of language.
Anonymous wrote:This really reinforces the idea that GPA is the screen nowadays; SAT is relevant only as a plus factor once you make it through the GPA screen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the OP - I am sorry - this will be my DC next year - DC is aiming high but with 2 B’s this year I don’t think they will do well. We also thought top rigor mattered but should have gone with the easier classes. I hope it all works out for your DC !
Context matters. If those are the only Bs, it's ok. If your kid goes to a rigorous top private, it's ok. If the Bs are in notoriously hard classes, it's better.
Anonymous wrote:Having such a high SAT score with a relatively low GPA makes him look low effort.
Anonymous wrote:Cannot emphasize enough the importance of a truly, brutally, realistically, balanced list
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the OP - I am sorry - this will be my DC next year - DC is aiming high but with 2 B’s this year I don’t think they will do well. We also thought top rigor mattered but should have gone with the easier classes. I hope it all works out for your DC !
Get a high test score and this will improve your chances at most flagships. By high I mean 35+ and 1520+ SAT
Anonymous wrote:To the OP - I am sorry - this will be my DC next year - DC is aiming high but with 2 B’s this year I don’t think they will do well. We also thought top rigor mattered but should have gone with the easier classes. I hope it all works out for your DC !
Anonymous wrote:To the OP - I am sorry - this will be my DC next year - DC is aiming high but with 2 B’s this year I don’t think they will do well. We also thought top rigor mattered but should have gone with the easier classes. I hope it all works out for your DC !
Anonymous wrote:People need to stop referring to OP's kid as 3.5 when everyone else uses the weighted scale. It is very misleading. I agree that comparing different school system's weighted GPAs is comparing apples and oranges but referring to unweighted when all anyone hears otherwise is weighted is worse.
The kid had high rigor and a 4.1W from (I think you said? sorry not to reread) FCPS. That is definitely too low for UVA. It is a maybe for William and Mary. And if not Engineering or Business, last year would have been in at Virginia Tech. I am not surprised that OP's kid assumed a yes at Virginia Tech. From everything I have seen on DCUM and in real life, Tech got MUCH harder this year.
Another school that has gotten MUCH harder this year if you're from NOVA is Tennessee. It wasn't that long ago (last year?) that Naviance showed everyone with a 4.0 and above getting in. And a very misleading school on Naviance is Penn State. Naviance shows it as a sea of green at many GPAs but they seem not to distinguish among between satellite campus and University Park.
I am afraid, OPs kid counted on schools that would very recently have been Targets or even Safeties per Naviance and had very bad luck with everything moving quickly. This should be a lesson to all of us with younger kids.