Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What have been decided yet?
They pass it all. No objections except Yang.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What have been decided yet?
They pass it all. No objections except Yang.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Julie is the only board member to vote against.
I’m surprised at Karla.
I'm surprised Julie stood up and voted no. Karla needs to go. She's ruining MCPS.
Anonymous wrote:What have been decided yet?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were yelling "shame, shame, shame."
Actions have consequences: not a one of them will be re-electe
Which one of them has asked for a racial equity analysis of the program model? Nobody has done that yet or even uttered the word "race" yet they keep screeching equity
They were unanimous in amending the resolution to include accountability. It was vague. Wish it it pulled directly from OLO Report 2026-2 but it’s something!
To all you Richie riches that complained about my kid going to school with yours, get ready!!! We remember your names and faces.
Anonymous wrote:Julie is the only board member to vote against.
I’m surprised at Karla.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were yelling "shame, shame, shame."
Actions have consequences: not a one of them will be re-electe
Which one of them has asked for a racial equity analysis of the program model? Nobody has done that yet or even uttered the word "race" yet they keep screeching equity
They were unanimous in amending the resolution to include accountability. It was vague. Wish it it pulled directly from OLO Report 2026-2 but it’s something!
To all you Richie riches that complained about my kid going to school with yours, get ready!!! We remember your names and faces.
Anonymous wrote:Good lord these leaders have zero empathy or respect for parents. You're gonna vote the way you are going vote, fine, but the dismissiveness is so gross
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were yelling "shame, shame, shame."
Actions have consequences: not a one of them will be re-electe
Which one of them has asked for a racial equity analysis of the program model? Nobody has done that yet or even uttered the word "race" yet they keep screeching equity
Anonymous wrote:Grace’s amendment passed. And it was unanimous. As I said, this whole this was orchestrated and rehearsed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grace is speaking. Just recycling all of the talking points we’ve heard from them before.
And then just restates all of the ways MCPS communicated about the Boundary Study as a defense that the process was rushed.
This ignores that the part people are calling rushed is the release of Option H.
That’s exactly how it works. Pro forma is not substantive process, though that’s what the BOE will claim to justify its actions.
This was completely expected and the strongest argument they have - which isn’t much.
Engagement isn’t just counting meetings—it’s whether people had a real opportunity to understand, analyze, and impact the outcome.
This is what the state BOE and a court will consider.
lol. That's not how this works.
Anonymous wrote:Omg someone (Montoya?) just said “lots of racism” into a hot mic when the crowd clapped for Julie’s vote!