Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This technology disrupts humanities-trained—largely Democratic—voters, and makes their economic power less. And increases the economic power of vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters,” Karp said in a CNBC interview Thursday. “And so these disruptions are gonna disrupt every aspect of our society. And to make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology; how are we gonna explain to people who are likely gonna have less good, and less interesting jobs.”

These poeple are lunatics.


https://newrepublic.com/post/207693/palantir-ceo-karp-disrupting-democratic-power

Project 2025....put women back in the kitchen.

Anonymous wrote:This technology disrupts humanities-trained—largely Democratic—voters, and makes their economic power less. And increases the economic power of vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters,” Karp said in a CNBC interview Thursday. “And so these disruptions are gonna disrupt every aspect of our society. And to make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology; how are we gonna explain to people who are likely gonna have less good, and less interesting jobs.”

These poeple are lunatics.


https://newrepublic.com/post/207693/palantir-ceo-karp-disrupting-democratic-power

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This technology disrupts humanities-trained—largely Democratic—voters, and makes their economic power less. And increases the economic power of vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters,” Karp said in a CNBC interview Thursday. “And so these disruptions are gonna disrupt every aspect of our society. And to make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology; how are we gonna explain to people who are likely gonna have less good, and less interesting jobs.”

These poeple are lunatics.


https://newrepublic.com/post/207693/palantir-ceo-karp-disrupting-democratic-power

Nah. His brain has turned into AI slop!

Anonymous wrote:This technology disrupts humanities-trained—largely Democratic—voters, and makes their economic power less. And increases the economic power of vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters,” Karp said in a CNBC interview Thursday. “And so these disruptions are gonna disrupt every aspect of our society. And to make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology; how are we gonna explain to people who are likely gonna have less good, and less interesting jobs.”

These poeple are lunatics.


https://newrepublic.com/post/207693/palantir-ceo-karp-disrupting-democratic-power

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really don't agree with the idea that the humanities will suffer more than manual laborers and tradesman. Where in the world do you get this idea from? Anything black and white, with clear right and wrong, can be more easily replaced by AI and robotics. This includes many STEM fields but also trades, maybe with the exception of highly artistic trades (maybe some unique woodworking, for example). It will be the fields that are more nuanced, that make full use of our humanity, that can survive. And humanities is the study of what makes us human. How can AI do that, when it is not human? So yes, i still tend to see it as innovation will free us from grinding daily labor to focus on artistic, "high" pursuits. Not that I think this is a great world because not everyone is capable of high pursuits and most humans who have ever lived have made a living based off grinding work, but I just think this scenario is more likely than the one with humans doing trades.

I think what he is saying is that white collar office work is going to go the way of the dinosaur. The vast majority of jobs in the US are service/white collar jobs that people with college degrees do. They are under significant threat due to AI automation. The only jobs left will be those requiring human labor, like the trades etc. Even fields like medicine, law, pharmacy,.....education focused professions are all going to be automated away.

it's easier to automate blue collar jobs than white collar jobs.

Tell me you’ve never re-wired a house without telling me you’ve never re-wired a house.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really don't agree with the idea that the humanities will suffer more than manual laborers and tradesman. Where in the world do you get this idea from? Anything black and white, with clear right and wrong, can be more easily replaced by AI and robotics. This includes many STEM fields but also trades, maybe with the exception of highly artistic trades (maybe some unique woodworking, for example). It will be the fields that are more nuanced, that make full use of our humanity, that can survive. And humanities is the study of what makes us human. How can AI do that, when it is not human? So yes, i still tend to see it as innovation will free us from grinding daily labor to focus on artistic, "high" pursuits. Not that I think this is a great world because not everyone is capable of high pursuits and most humans who have ever lived have made a living based off grinding work, but I just think this scenario is more likely than the one with humans doing trades.

I think what he is saying is that white collar office work is going to go the way of the dinosaur. The vast majority of jobs in the US are service/white collar jobs that people with college degrees do. They are under significant threat due to AI automation. The only jobs left will be those requiring human labor, like the trades etc. Even fields like medicine, law, pharmacy,.....education focused professions are all going to be automated away.

it's easier to automate blue collar jobs than white collar jobs.

Tell me you’ve never re-wired a house without telling me you’ve never re-wired a house.

Is every blue collar job re-wiring a house?

Roofing
Installing new gutters
Replacing a hot water heater
Tuning up a furnace
Landscaping
Etc., etc., etc.

A robot/machinery can at some point do most of that.

Anonymous wrote:I hope that AI sex is worth it

Anonymous wrote:This technology disrupts humanities-trained—largely Democratic—voters, and makes their economic power less. And increases the economic power of vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters,” Karp said in a CNBC interview Thursday. “And so these disruptions are gonna disrupt every aspect of our society. And to make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology; how are we gonna explain to people who are likely gonna have less good, and less interesting jobs.”

These poeple are lunatics.


https://newrepublic.com/post/207693/palantir-ceo-karp-disrupting-democratic-power

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really don't agree with the idea that the humanities will suffer more than manual laborers and tradesman. Where in the world do you get this idea from? Anything black and white, with clear right and wrong, can be more easily replaced by AI and robotics. This includes many STEM fields but also trades, maybe with the exception of highly artistic trades (maybe some unique woodworking, for example). It will be the fields that are more nuanced, that make full use of our humanity, that can survive. And humanities is the study of what makes us human. How can AI do that, when it is not human? So yes, i still tend to see it as innovation will free us from grinding daily labor to focus on artistic, "high" pursuits. Not that I think this is a great world because not everyone is capable of high pursuits and most humans who have ever lived have made a living based off grinding work, but I just think this scenario is more likely than the one with humans doing trades.

I think what he is saying is that white collar office work is going to go the way of the dinosaur. The vast majority of jobs in the US are service/white collar jobs that people with college degrees do. They are under significant threat due to AI automation. The only jobs left will be those requiring human labor, like the trades etc. Even fields like medicine, law, pharmacy,.....education focused professions are all going to be automated away.

it's easier to automate blue collar jobs than white collar jobs.

Tell me you’ve never re-wired a house without telling me you’ve never re-wired a house.

Is every blue collar job re-wiring a house?

Roofing
Installing new gutters
Replacing a hot water heater
Tuning up a furnace
Landscaping
Etc., etc., etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really don't agree with the idea that the humanities will suffer more than manual laborers and tradesman. Where in the world do you get this idea from? Anything black and white, with clear right and wrong, can be more easily replaced by AI and robotics. This includes many STEM fields but also trades, maybe with the exception of highly artistic trades (maybe some unique woodworking, for example). It will be the fields that are more nuanced, that make full use of our humanity, that can survive. And humanities is the study of what makes us human. How can AI do that, when it is not human? So yes, i still tend to see it as innovation will free us from grinding daily labor to focus on artistic, "high" pursuits. Not that I think this is a great world because not everyone is capable of high pursuits and most humans who have ever lived have made a living based off grinding work, but I just think this scenario is more likely than the one with humans doing trades.

I think what he is saying is that white collar office work is going to go the way of the dinosaur. The vast majority of jobs in the US are service/white collar jobs that people with college degrees do. They are under significant threat due to AI automation. The only jobs left will be those requiring human labor, like the trades etc. Even fields like medicine, law, pharmacy,.....education focused professions are all going to be automated away.

it's easier to automate blue collar jobs than white collar jobs.

Tell me you’ve never re-wired a house without telling me you’ve never re-wired a house.

Is every blue collar job re-wiring a house?

Roofing
Installing new gutters
Replacing a hot water heater
Tuning up a furnace
Landscaping
Etc., etc., etc.

Anonymous wrote:Good, make american democrats poor and make MAGA rich again! - signed from Canberra

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really don't agree with the idea that the humanities will suffer more than manual laborers and tradesman. Where in the world do you get this idea from? Anything black and white, with clear right and wrong, can be more easily replaced by AI and robotics. This includes many STEM fields but also trades, maybe with the exception of highly artistic trades (maybe some unique woodworking, for example). It will be the fields that are more nuanced, that make full use of our humanity, that can survive. And humanities is the study of what makes us human. How can AI do that, when it is not human? So yes, i still tend to see it as innovation will free us from grinding daily labor to focus on artistic, "high" pursuits. Not that I think this is a great world because not everyone is capable of high pursuits and most humans who have ever lived have made a living based off grinding work, but I just think this scenario is more likely than the one with humans doing trades.

I think what he is saying is that white collar office work is going to go the way of the dinosaur. The vast majority of jobs in the US are service/white collar jobs that people with college degrees do. They are under significant threat due to AI automation. The only jobs left will be those requiring human labor, like the trades etc. Even fields like medicine, law, pharmacy,.....education focused professions are all going to be automated away.

it's easier to automate blue collar jobs than white collar jobs.

Tell me you’ve never re-wired a house without telling me you’ve never re-wired a house.

Is every blue collar job re-wiring a house?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really don't agree with the idea that the humanities will suffer more than manual laborers and tradesman. Where in the world do you get this idea from? Anything black and white, with clear right and wrong, can be more easily replaced by AI and robotics. This includes many STEM fields but also trades, maybe with the exception of highly artistic trades (maybe some unique woodworking, for example). It will be the fields that are more nuanced, that make full use of our humanity, that can survive. And humanities is the study of what makes us human. How can AI do that, when it is not human? So yes, i still tend to see it as innovation will free us from grinding daily labor to focus on artistic, "high" pursuits. Not that I think this is a great world because not everyone is capable of high pursuits and most humans who have ever lived have made a living based off grinding work, but I just think this scenario is more likely than the one with humans doing trades.

I think what he is saying is that white collar office work is going to go the way of the dinosaur. The vast majority of jobs in the US are service/white collar jobs that people with college degrees do. They are under significant threat due to AI automation. The only jobs left will be those requiring human labor, like the trades etc. Even fields like medicine, law, pharmacy,.....education focused professions are all going to be automated away.

it's easier to automate blue collar jobs than white collar jobs.

Tell me you’ve never re-wired a house without telling me you’ve never re-wired a house.

Prediction. If the trades are where it’s at, black women will head that direction and displace all the white bubbas. Can’t wait.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s always firefighters, paramedics, EMTs and cops.

All being paid for by the nonexistent taxpayer. How do you expect to pay the firefighters if nobody has a job????

There will still be industry.

Bottom line is that companies replacing human workers with AI and robotics should be expected to pay more in taxes to make society whole again.

This is never going to happen, they will let people starve if need be.

I'm OK with it. Starve!