Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I sense that people like Google execs will ensure they have access to high quality in-person medical visits with cream of the crop doctors and lawyers while the rest of us are told to fxk off and talk to the machine.
You don’t get it. The machine with a few years of training will be better than an inner city ER doctor. The malpractice will be much less common. Similar to how Waymo is safer than human drivers.
Anonymous wrote:I sense that people like Google execs will ensure they have access to high quality in-person medical visits with cream of the crop doctors and lawyers while the rest of us are told to fxk off and talk to the machine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You weenies should read the article. The guy isn't saying that doctors and lawyers and scientists are obsolete. He's saying that spending half a million dollars and 3 years to memorize a ton of information already in books is a waste of money and time.
Law school involves almost no memorization, so that's another great example of AI guys thinking they understand jobs they don't do and education they didn't get. I hate the phrase "think like a lawyer" but it's an accurate description of what you learn in law school - skills not information.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/careersandeducation/ex-google-exec-says-degrees-in-law-and-medicine-are-a-waste-of-time-because-they-take-so-long-to-complete-that-ai-will-catch-up-by-graduation/ar-AA1W8Fzh?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=69ad725a7d7b4a33a3b8db35aa5b5448&ei=29
My DS and DD are in first year of medical school with student loan debt at public universities, and this really scares me. My younger brother is working for an AI company specializing in radiology that can do a much better job than a radiologist.
How much does that tech bro stand to earn by making everyone think AI is all that? They will make bank on stocks and be on to the next tech thing they will not allow their own children to use.
Sorry, bro. When I need a tumor removed or a chemo treatment plan, I want a human and not AI slop.
I am hiring a lawyer this week to do my estate planning. Not using AI for that either.
Claude will let you know what to do in terms of documents and financial planing to minimize the estate tax. As an attorney, it is 95% of the way there in terms of the actual strategy of estate law. In terms of documents, it is probably 3 years away from outperforming the median estate attorney. Maybe five years from being near perfect.
So still 3 years away from doing one of the most basic practice areas better than the median lawyer….
For HNW individuals it is far from the most basic practice area. It will overtake junior transactional work in a quicker timeframe.
It is very basic even for UHNW. And estate lawyers, including for UNHW, have been using software to draft for decades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/careersandeducation/ex-google-exec-says-degrees-in-law-and-medicine-are-a-waste-of-time-because-they-take-so-long-to-complete-that-ai-will-catch-up-by-graduation/ar-AA1W8Fzh?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=69ad725a7d7b4a33a3b8db35aa5b5448&ei=29
My DS and DD are in first year of medical school with student loan debt at public universities, and this really scares me. My younger brother is working for an AI company specializing in radiology that can do a much better job than a radiologist.
How much does that tech bro stand to earn by making everyone think AI is all that? They will make bank on stocks and be on to the next tech thing they will not allow their own children to use.
Sorry, bro. When I need a tumor removed or a chemo treatment plan, I want a human and not AI slop.
I am hiring a lawyer this week to do my estate planning. Not using AI for that either.
Claude will let you know what to do in terms of documents and financial planing to minimize the estate tax. As an attorney, it is 95% of the way there in terms of the actual strategy of estate law. In terms of documents, it is probably 3 years away from outperforming the median estate attorney. Maybe five years from being near perfect.
So still 3 years away from doing one of the most basic practice areas better than the median lawyer….
For HNW individuals it is far from the most basic practice area. It will overtake junior transactional work in a quicker timeframe.
Anonymous wrote:Google says as it pays the most elite firms thousands an hour to defend it in its numerous antitrust suits…
If AI is so great, why not have Gemini defend it in its cases?
Anonymous wrote:Guys, AI is taking over,m. The gullible rush to embrace it and be “forward thinking” and not a Luddite is hastening the end of most jobs done by humans. I work at a labor union. We’ve been told to be AI forward. Let that sink in.
Anonymous wrote:You weenies should read the article. The guy isn't saying that doctors and lawyers and scientists are obsolete. He's saying that spending half a million dollars and 3 years to memorize a ton of information already in books is a waste of money and time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok so you go to AI doctor with your kid, kid has heritable illness. AI overlords sterilize you and kid to lower social healthcare costs in long term.
You go to AI doctor at age 75 and it diagnosis cancer. Sends you to palliative care because AI overlords have rule about treating old people.
What's not to like?
You sound as delusional as tea partiers and their “death panels.” In reality that AI doctors costs a few thousand a year to operate so they’ll have more money for R&D and nurses to get you healthy again.
Anonymous wrote:Tech people always say that everything will be taken over by AI or solved by technology.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/careersandeducation/ex-google-exec-says-degrees-in-law-and-medicine-are-a-waste-of-time-because-they-take-so-long-to-complete-that-ai-will-catch-up-by-graduation/ar-AA1W8Fzh?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=69ad725a7d7b4a33a3b8db35aa5b5448&ei=29
My DS and DD are in first year of medical school with student loan debt at public universities, and this really scares me. My younger brother is working for an AI company specializing in radiology that can do a much better job than a radiologist.
How much does that tech bro stand to earn by making everyone think AI is all that? They will make bank on stocks and be on to the next tech thing they will not allow their own children to use.
Sorry, bro. When I need a tumor removed or a chemo treatment plan, I want a human and not AI slop.
I am hiring a lawyer this week to do my estate planning. Not using AI for that either.
Claude will let you know what to do in terms of documents and financial planing to minimize the estate tax. As an attorney, it is 95% of the way there in terms of the actual strategy of estate law. In terms of documents, it is probably 3 years away from outperforming the median estate attorney. Maybe five years from being near perfect.
So still 3 years away from doing one of the most basic practice areas better than the median lawyer….
Anonymous wrote:You weenies should read the article. The guy isn't saying that doctors and lawyers and scientists are obsolete. He's saying that spending half a million dollars and 3 years to memorize a ton of information already in books is a waste of money and time.
Anonymous wrote:Part of the role of the physician is assuming professional liability. When AI companies are willing and able to assume the malpractice risk for misdiagnosis/faulty treatment, including having to pay out for malpractice suits, then I will be worried that doctors will be replaced. Until then, a doctor is needed. of course, it will make life much worse for the remaining doctors if AI efficiency increases the expectation to sign off on hundreds of AI assisted cases and assume liability for them. I’m a 50 yo radiologist, and when the day comes that I have to do that, I will just retire. I’m already financially independent; have been saving and investing as preparation for that exact scenario. AI can just sign off on itself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I find these "experts" know little about the lived experiences, needs, and preferences of the majority of people.
Yea. I need a hectic and understaffed ER in the city that takes eight hours to get through for ultimately minor ailments. Extra points for patients who are handcuffed to their bed because they also committed a felony. I’ll take AI
It's such a failure of imagination that the response to complaints about unaffordable unpleasant medical care is to throw AI at the problem instead of saying "hey, maybe we should have excellent, affordable human provided care like the rest of the developed world does."
The rest of the world doesn’t have obese flyovers and minorities who eat ultra processed foods and do drugs. It skyrockets premiums that are given out by the gubmint like candy