Anonymous wrote:can someone explain how these gpa's correlate to the 4.0 ratings? Like what is equivalent to a 3.9?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's fascinating is that many of the most successful applicants are in the 95-96 GPA band and the tippy-top students are sometimes getting rejected everywhere.
94.96, 1540, in at MIT
Is there a reason for that? Is it FGLI ? or some kind of hook? Seems RD acceptances are much better than ED.
800 math. I don’t think MIT cares overmuch about verbal. In at all the engineering schools and out at all the Ivy-style privates, so probably a strong engineering-related EC.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's fascinating is that many of the most successful applicants are in the 95-96 GPA band and the tippy-top students are sometimes getting rejected everywhere.
94.96, 1540, in at MIT
Is there a reason for that? Is it FGLI ? or some kind of hook? Seems RD acceptances are much better than ED.
Anonymous wrote:can someone explain how these gpa's correlate to the 4.0 ratings? Like what is equivalent to a 3.9?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's fascinating is that many of the most successful applicants are in the 95-96 GPA band and the tippy-top students are sometimes getting rejected everywhere.
94.96, 1540, in at MIT
I'm not shocked by the acceptances, I am shocked by the popularity of those EDsAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a Cornell feeder. Very very well known to AO. Extremely well-prepared kids.
I am a bit shocked at how many ED are to Cornell, Duke and NYU
Its a good well known school.
Anonymous wrote:Here is one student’s list…
Cal Poly; Illinois Inst. Tech (ED); Johns Hopkins U. (ED); Michigan State U. (EA);
Brown U. (ED); Carnegie Mellon U.;
Cooper Union (Adv. Sci. & Art) (ED);
NC State U. Raleigh; Ohio U.; Penn
Cornell U.; Duke U. (ED); Georgia Inst.
State U. (EA); Purdue U. (EA); RPI (ED);
Tech (EA); Northeastern U. (EA);
SUNY Stony Brook; Texas A&M U. (EA);
U. Colorado-Boulder; U. Illinois Urbana-
Northwestern U. (ED); Princeton U.; Rice
U. (ED); U. Michigan (Ann Arbor); U.
Champaign (EA); U. Minnesota; U.
Wisconsin (Madison); UMD-College
Penn (ED); U. Texas-Austin; UC Berkley;
UC Los Angeles; UC San Diego;
Park; Virginia Tech
Vanderbilt U.
Beyond unethical.
Anonymous wrote:What's fascinating is that many of the most successful applicants are in the 95-96 GPA band and the tippy-top students are sometimes getting rejected everywhere.
Anonymous wrote:20 cornell acceptees across 2 classes in a giant NY public school is very meh to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1757445385/greatneckk12nyus/q7y8mxdiqytrdz2lycb2/SHS-SummaryReport-PROOF-WEBSITE-VERSION-R2.pdf
First five pages: High test score (1500+) AND high GPA (top 10%). Excellent results. Cornell, Brown, T5
At or below 50% GPA, there are a few standout acceptances (T30 schools):
page 37, 1560, NYU
page 36, 1520, Boston U
page 29, 1520, Boston U
page 28, 1520, Emory
page 28, 1560, UM
page 27, 1540, CMU
page 27, 1520, UM
page 26, 1560, NYU
page 21, 1570, Columbia
The rest of below 50% mostly go to SUNY and CUNY without a high test score.
I wish every school has this kind of transparency so we don't have to rely on anecdata.
Pages 19-21, around top 30% GPA band, some ivy/T20 acceptance with high test scores:
page 19, 1560, Cornell
page 20, 1570, UM
page 21, 1540, Rice
page 21, 1570, Columbia
page 21, 1550, Cornell
Penn took a 1590 kid top 25% (94.38).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Their very top (#1) GPA kid (99.11, 1590, 17AP) got in UT, UVA, NYU only. What happened?
Might be a kid with NYU ties financially set for life. Not everyone is a prestige striver.