Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at this, MAGA. It's on you.
This photo is worth a lot of votes against Republicans!
Democrats put this child in the situation sad
Actually whoever brought him here put him in this situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to bring some attempted calm to today's DCUM hysteria...
As for why the child was taken at all, this part matters: ICE does not leave small children unattended when a parent is arrested. When a minor’s legal guardian is taken into custody and there is no immediately available alternative guardian on scene, the child is taken into ICE custody with the parent under family detention procedures. That is exactly what happened here. The child was not arrested as a criminal; he was placed into family custody because his parent was detained and there was no one else legally available to take him at that moment.
Finally, the claim that the child is “a legal citizen born here” is not supported by the reporting. The articles describe the family as asylum seekers with an active immigration case. None of the major coverage states the child is a confirmed U.S. citizen. Saying that as a fact when it hasn’t been established is misinformation.
Please, don't bother the raving liberals with facts.
I was one of the first people to respond. I think it is better to keep families together than to separate them and said so (though I have since learned that there may have been a family member at the scene, so I may take that back).
What is cruel, unnecessary, and in total disregard of the law is to detain a man who is LEGAL. The fact that they have no right detaining him makes taking the child along unforgivable.
Who determined he was legal?
Why are people not getting this?
If you came to a border crossing and presented yourself to the guard and asked for asylum, you were assigned an immigration case number, you downloaded an app that would notify you of your court hearings and you were allowed to come into the country LEGALLY.
The US Government allowed this father and son (and some other family members) to come in LEGALLY.
So the US Government determined they were LEGAL.
And according to the lawyer who has seen the immigration status papers, they were following the procedures LEGALLY.
Yet the father and 5 yo were plucked out of their driveway and most likely sent to Texas.
These aren't criminals - these are people who followed the US rules at the time and entered with the permission of the US.
That means LEGAL.
Got it yet?
Anonymous wrote:Smuggling a child into the US illegally should not be some shield against future deportation. Nor should pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:to bring some attempted calm to today's DCUM hysteria...
As for why the child was taken at all, this part matters: ICE does not leave small children unattended when a parent is arrested. When a minor’s legal guardian is taken into custody and there is no immediately available alternative guardian on scene, the child is taken into ICE custody with the parent under family detention procedures. That is exactly what happened here. The child was not arrested as a criminal; he was placed into family custody because his parent was detained and there was no one else legally available to take him at that moment.
Finally, the claim that the child is “a legal citizen born here” is not supported by the reporting. The articles describe the family as asylum seekers with an active immigration case. None of the major coverage states the child is a confirmed U.S. citizen. Saying that as a fact when it hasn’t been established is misinformation.
Anonymous wrote:to bring some attempted calm to today's DCUM hysteria...
As for why the child was taken at all, this part matters: ICE does not leave small children unattended when a parent is arrested. When a minor’s legal guardian is taken into custody and there is no immediately available alternative guardian on scene, the child is taken into ICE custody with the parent under family detention procedures. That is exactly what happened here. The child was not arrested as a criminal; he was placed into family custody because his parent was detained and there was no one else legally available to take him at that moment.
Finally, the claim that the child is “a legal citizen born here” is not supported by the reporting. The articles describe the family as asylum seekers with an active immigration case. None of the major coverage states the child is a confirmed U.S. citizen. Saying that as a fact when it hasn’t been established is misinformation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to bring some attempted calm to today's DCUM hysteria...
As for why the child was taken at all, this part matters: ICE does not leave small children unattended when a parent is arrested. When a minor’s legal guardian is taken into custody and there is no immediately available alternative guardian on scene, the child is taken into ICE custody with the parent under family detention procedures. That is exactly what happened here. The child was not arrested as a criminal; he was placed into family custody because his parent was detained and there was no one else legally available to take him at that moment.
Finally, the claim that the child is “a legal citizen born here” is not supported by the reporting. The articles describe the family as asylum seekers with an active immigration case. None of the major coverage states the child is a confirmed U.S. citizen. Saying that as a fact when it hasn’t been established is misinformation.
Please, don't bother the raving liberals with facts.
Anonymous wrote:to bring some attempted calm to today's DCUM hysteria...
As for why the child was taken at all, this part matters: ICE does not leave small children unattended when a parent is arrested. When a minor’s legal guardian is taken into custody and there is no immediately available alternative guardian on scene, the child is taken into ICE custody with the parent under family detention procedures. That is exactly what happened here. The child was not arrested as a criminal; he was placed into family custody because his parent was detained and there was no one else legally available to take him at that moment.
Finally, the claim that the child is “a legal citizen born here” is not supported by the reporting. The articles describe the family as asylum seekers with an active immigration case. None of the major coverage states the child is a confirmed U.S. citizen. Saying that as a fact when it hasn’t been established is misinformation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to bring some attempted calm to today's DCUM hysteria...
As for why the child was taken at all, this part matters: ICE does not leave small children unattended when a parent is arrested. When a minor’s legal guardian is taken into custody and there is no immediately available alternative guardian on scene, the child is taken into ICE custody with the parent under family detention procedures. That is exactly what happened here. The child was not arrested as a criminal; he was placed into family custody because his parent was detained and there was no one else legally available to take him at that moment.
Finally, the claim that the child is “a legal citizen born here” is not supported by the reporting. The articles describe the family as asylum seekers with an active immigration case. None of the major coverage states the child is a confirmed U.S. citizen. Saying that as a fact when it hasn’t been established is misinformation.
In other words, the family is legally here, and ICE kidnapped a 5-year old. They used a 5-year old as bait to attempt to lure the mother out. Pure evil.
Anonymous wrote:Look at this, MAGA. It's on you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to bring some attempted calm to today's DCUM hysteria...
As for why the child was taken at all, this part matters: ICE does not leave small children unattended when a parent is arrested. When a minor’s legal guardian is taken into custody and there is no immediately available alternative guardian on scene, the child is taken into ICE custody with the parent under family detention procedures. That is exactly what happened here. The child was not arrested as a criminal; he was placed into family custody because his parent was detained and there was no one else legally available to take him at that moment.
Finally, the claim that the child is “a legal citizen born here” is not supported by the reporting. The articles describe the family as asylum seekers with an active immigration case. None of the major coverage states the child is a confirmed U.S. citizen. Saying that as a fact when it hasn’t been established is misinformation.
Please, don't bother the raving liberals with facts.
Yes just use children as bait. Republicans are sick individuals. I can see why they are protecting Epstein’s gang of pedophiles.
"Custody" like the child will be safe there.
These kind of placements are very bad for the child. And do you really think anyone in this administration is actually vetting who gets near this child?
They never meant for this picture to get out
Keep recording and documenting to get their story out
Remember the fireman carrying out the dead toddler from Oklahoma City
This country is a very visual one, very few real readers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to bring some attempted calm to today's DCUM hysteria...
As for why the child was taken at all, this part matters: ICE does not leave small children unattended when a parent is arrested. When a minor’s legal guardian is taken into custody and there is no immediately available alternative guardian on scene, the child is taken into ICE custody with the parent under family detention procedures. That is exactly what happened here. The child was not arrested as a criminal; he was placed into family custody because his parent was detained and there was no one else legally available to take him at that moment.
Finally, the claim that the child is “a legal citizen born here” is not supported by the reporting. The articles describe the family as asylum seekers with an active immigration case. None of the major coverage states the child is a confirmed U.S. citizen. Saying that as a fact when it hasn’t been established is misinformation.
Please, don't bother the raving liberals with facts.
Yes just use children as bait. Republicans are sick individuals. I can see why they are protecting Epstein’s gang of pedophiles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apparently, the preschool was sent to Texas. Heartbreaking. This administration is full of despicable human beings, who definitely should not call themselves Christians. Miller obviously isn’t anyway.
None of them are christ like. this administration is full of evil
Can you imagine finding out that your father was an ICE agent?
It will be like finding great grandpa’s SS uniform.
I don’t think anyone intends to treat today’s ICE like we treated rank and file Nazis. They know what they are doing is illegal and immoral, and the law needs to hold them to account.