Anonymous wrote:Has anyone changed their mind about anything based on this data? Did it inform you in any way of something you didn’t know?
For me, it was that the “rich schools” don’t have really ridiculous HHI.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone changed their mind about anything based on this data? Did it inform you in any way of something you didn’t know?
For me, it was that the “rich schools” don’t have really ridiculous HHI.
I’m not surprised, but I still think median household incomes above 200k are very high.
But also half are below that at these very rich schools. A HHI below $200k is still like two teachers.
This does seem like it conflicts somewhat with home values. Maybe I am clueless but are town houses or $600k houses somewhere in the Whitman catchment I’m unaware of? Where do the under $200k HHI people live for Whitman?
Anonymous wrote:Since we are geeking on data, any idea where to get average grades or standardized test scores per school? Same cohorts from ES to MS and HS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone changed their mind about anything based on this data? Did it inform you in any way of something you didn’t know?
For me, it was that the “rich schools” don’t have really ridiculous HHI.
I’m not surprised, but I still think median household incomes above 200k are very high.
But also half are below that at these very rich schools. A HHI below $200k is still like two teachers.
This does seem like it conflicts somewhat with home values. Maybe I am clueless but are town houses or $600k houses somewhere in the Whitman catchment I’m unaware of? Where do the under $200k HHI people live for Whitman?
I’m not familiar with housing there. But imagining these households: there will also be single income households, people working in lower paid work, older adults who have been in their homes forever, and renters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone changed their mind about anything based on this data? Did it inform you in any way of something you didn’t know?
For me, it was that the “rich schools” don’t have really ridiculous HHI.
And yet there are huge FARMS rates differentials. People see what they want to see.
"Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!" -- Homer Simpson
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone changed their mind about anything based on this data? Did it inform you in any way of something you didn’t know?
For me, it was that the “rich schools” don’t have really ridiculous HHI.
I’m not surprised, but I still think median household incomes above 200k are very high.
But also half are below that at these very rich schools. A HHI below $200k is still like two teachers.
This does seem like it conflicts somewhat with home values. Maybe I am clueless but are town houses or $600k houses somewhere in the Whitman catchment I’m unaware of? Where do the under $200k HHI people live for Whitman?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone changed their mind about anything based on this data? Did it inform you in any way of something you didn’t know?
For me, it was that the “rich schools” don’t have really ridiculous HHI.
I’m not surprised, but I still think median household incomes above 200k are very high.
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone changed their mind about anything based on this data? Did it inform you in any way of something you didn’t know?
For me, it was that the “rich schools” don’t have really ridiculous HHI.
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone changed their mind about anything based on this data? Did it inform you in any way of something you didn’t know?
For me, it was that the “rich schools” don’t have really ridiculous HHI.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here. I did this in part because every time wealth inequality comes up it is hard to compare schools to each other. FARMS just gives you the low end, not any indication of the high end. Looking at other data sources and proxies is problematic. Data sources often aren't closely tied to school boundaries, and it is hard to demonstrate you're not cherry picking data.
I double checked the logic and did some consistency checks with zip codes. The data seems to be accurate. But this isn't the median income for families of students- it includes young married couples and married retirees. Even for families with kids, it includes single-parent households and single-earner households. These will drive the median lower than whatever you might intuitively expect. And in some cases, people underestimate how many multi-family homes are in an area- you don't need a lot of space to offset expensive SFHs.
If you're going off of zip code, then the consortium schools are going to be totally wrong since students don't necessarily end up at their neighborhood school. NEC wise, for example, Blake has the most enrollment, but has a smaller number of families than PB on this table. This only works for neighborhood schools, not magnet and consortium schools.
Anonymous wrote:Op here. I did this in part because every time wealth inequality comes up it is hard to compare schools to each other. FARMS just gives you the low end, not any indication of the high end. Looking at other data sources and proxies is problematic. Data sources often aren't closely tied to school boundaries, and it is hard to demonstrate you're not cherry picking data.
I double checked the logic and did some consistency checks with zip codes. The data seems to be accurate. But this isn't the median income for families of students- it includes young married couples and married retirees. Even for families with kids, it includes single-parent households and single-earner households. These will drive the median lower than whatever you might intuitively expect. And in some cases, people underestimate how many multi-family homes are in an area- you don't need a lot of space to offset expensive SFHs.