Anonymous wrote:They should, but they don't.
In 2026, weddings are planned and dominated by what the bride and occassionally her mother wants.
Rare is the bride that lets her future husband have a significant voice in the wedding planning.
Even rarer is the bride that gives the groom's parents a voice in the wedding planning.
Until brides join this century and give the groom's side equal voice in the wedding planning, the bride's family should be respinsible for the bulk of the wedding cost
Not our experience at all. Please provide support for all these claims - or is this just all opinion and assumptions?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gave DD 25K for her wedding a few years ago which was most of what the wedding cost. The couple spent more on some extras. 100 people. Married outside the DMV. For DS will contribute the same. The sooner he uses it the better, not increasing it for inflation. We are a Retired Fed/SAHM. Net worth a few million.
That's generous.
How do you do a catered wedding with alcohol for $25k for 100 people?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My oldest is only 15, and a boy, but if/when he gets married, I work contribute whatever they need if the bride’s parents aren’t paying or we’d do rehearsal/honeymoon. DH and I were able to fund our $100k wedding 20 years ago, and I’d want something at least as nice for them.
You expect the women’s family to pay?! Why? Because it’s tradition? It’s only tradition because historically women didn’t work or receive an education. Now that’s not the case. Don’t continue your sexist way of thinking when the world has changed.
Yeah, team boy mom.
When the bride is willing to relinquish all or half of the decision making to the groom and future mother in law, then your post would make sense.
But weddings are planned almost 100% by the bride, even today, down to the shoes the groom wears, and approval of or guidelines for the dress that the mother in law wears.
A wedding is one of those things where the old adage of if you are going to expect money from someone, then get ready to earn the money in the form of their (often unwelcome) opinions
Unless a bride is willing to let the groom's side be involved in decision-making and planning, then weddings should continue to follow the traditional route of the bride's side paying for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They should, but they don't.
In 2026, weddings are planned and dominated by what the bride and occassionally her mother wants.
Rare is the bride that lets her future husband have a significant voice in the wedding planning.
Even rarer is the bride that gives the groom's parents a voice in the wedding planning.
Until brides join this century and give the groom's side equal voice in the wedding planning, the bride's family should be respinsible for the bulk of the wedding cost
Not our experience at all. Please provide support for all these claims - or is this just all opinion and assumptions?
I can see the usual brigade has come out full steam offended. But here's the thing. This is closer to the reality. Most weddings are still planned by the bride and her family. Groom input ranges from nicely involved to turn up on the day in a tuxedo. There are plenty of exceptions including where the couple plans the wedding instead of the parents.
But the majority of weddings are still dominated by the bride and her family. Unless the groom's family is significantly wealthier and in that case they can quite often take over the wedding.
Just ask any experienced weddings planner how the real world operates.
Anonymous wrote:The couple may have 80% of the ideas and would prefer to be the only ones doing the planning, but if they aren't paying for it all, there will be some expenses the parents may not pay for.
Anonymous wrote:They should, but they don't.
In 2026, weddings are planned and dominated by what the bride and occassionally her mother wants.
Rare is the bride that lets her future husband have a significant voice in the wedding planning.
Even rarer is the bride that gives the groom's parents a voice in the wedding planning.
Until brides join this century and give the groom's side equal voice in the wedding planning, the bride's family should be respinsible for the bulk of the wedding cost
Not our experience at all. Please provide support for all these claims - or is this just all opinion and assumptions?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For mine, if they choose to marry it will be on them. I’d gift them a few thousand, but they could use it for whatever they like.
Similar. Probably give them like $10K each, and it will be my gift.
We paid for our wedding ourselves, the parents gifted us photo and video.