Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A man to have free sex with you? Of course.

A man who will also follow rules about protection and not seeing other people and respecting your boundaries? Seems unlikely.

I'm a woman who has had multiple FWB and this seems kind of ridiculous.

Protection: I always insist on condoms, if they won't, then we don't have sex. But most men will, I've only known one guy who absolutely refused, so we parted ways.

Not seeing other people: you have no right to insist a FWB not see other people. Even when I have one, I am dating and seeing other people. Am I sleeping with them? Usually not; usually once I start dating someone, I end the FWB relationship. But yea, once in awhile when I have a FWB, I meet a hot guy I want to sleep with and I do. I'd be absolutely furious if a FWB tried to control what I did and tell me what I can/can't do. If he doesn't like it, he can leave.

Respecting boundaries: exactly what boundaries? The boundaries that they have to be committed to you while you're free to do whatever you want? Stupid. If you're going to ban each other from seeing others, that's not FWB, that's a relationship.

No clue why there's been so many weird posts here like "my FWB is cheating!" The very definition of a FWB is that you hookup and nothing else. It's not cheating, it's not disrespecting boundaries.

You are probably my favorite DCUM poster. A lot of people find you upsetting or threatening. I think you make sense. (I'm pretty sure you are the late forties woman who says she's still attractive, though not as attractive as when she was younger, and had two boyfriends for a while, one good in bed, the other good at conversation.)

These answer is puzzling as I’m not sure how the lady makes it work and safe to her.
Condoms don’t protect from everything. It’s would take regular STD testing and being sexually exclusive to be 100% protected for me. And what about oral sex?

If you want exclusivity, then you’re looking for a relationship, not a FWB.

I would totally be interested in a hot FWB with exclusivity condition. But men would lie and still sleep around which is why I never had a FwB

If you’ve never had a FWB this isn’t really relevant for you.

No, actually it is relevant because I want to have one . Condoms alone just don’t give me a peace of mind
If you could answer practical questions about oral sex, STDs that would be helpful to me

I would rather not have sex than wear a condom. I get absolutely no pleasure from wearing one.

Yakis I have absolutely no desire to get your other partners’ papillomas. You don’t even pay for dates I wonder why women are so desperate for a D? It will cost me more to remove papillomas . I guess I’m good with toys outside serious relationship . Men treat FWB women like trash that nobody wants

Condoms don’t prevent genital warts anyhow

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A man to have free sex with you? Of course.

A man who will also follow rules about protection and not seeing other people and respecting your boundaries? Seems unlikely.

I'm a woman who has had multiple FWB and this seems kind of ridiculous.

Protection: I always insist on condoms, if they won't, then we don't have sex. But most men will, I've only known one guy who absolutely refused, so we parted ways.

Not seeing other people: you have no right to insist a FWB not see other people. Even when I have one, I am dating and seeing other people. Am I sleeping with them? Usually not; usually once I start dating someone, I end the FWB relationship. But yea, once in awhile when I have a FWB, I meet a hot guy I want to sleep with and I do. I'd be absolutely furious if a FWB tried to control what I did and tell me what I can/can't do. If he doesn't like it, he can leave.

Respecting boundaries: exactly what boundaries? The boundaries that they have to be committed to you while you're free to do whatever you want? Stupid. If you're going to ban each other from seeing others, that's not FWB, that's a relationship.

No clue why there's been so many weird posts here like "my FWB is cheating!" The very definition of a FWB is that you hookup and nothing else. It's not cheating, it's not disrespecting boundaries.

You are probably my favorite DCUM poster. A lot of people find you upsetting or threatening. I think you make sense. (I'm pretty sure you are the late forties woman who says she's still attractive, though not as attractive as when she was younger, and had two boyfriends for a while, one good in bed, the other good at conversation.)

These answer is puzzling as I’m not sure how the lady makes it work and safe to her.
Condoms don’t protect from everything. It’s would take regular STD testing and being sexually exclusive to be 100% protected for me. And what about oral sex?

If you want exclusivity, then you’re looking for a relationship, not a FWB.

I would totally be interested in a hot FWB with exclusivity condition. But men would lie and still sleep around which is why I never had a FwB

If you’ve never had a FWB this isn’t really relevant for you.

No, actually it is relevant because I want to have one . Condoms alone just don’t give me a peace of mind
If you could answer practical questions about oral sex, STDs that would be helpful to me

I would rather not have sex than wear a condom. I get absolutely no pleasure from wearing one.

Yakis I have absolutely no desire to get your other partners’ papillomas. You don’t even pay for dates I wonder why women are so desperate for a D? It will cost me more to remove papillomas . I guess I’m good with toys outside serious relationship . Men treat FWB women like trash that nobody wants

Yep, definitely the same guy.

You are sick, I agree. This is a sickness. Trolling mommy forums to get your jollies "negging" random women is bizarre and unhealthy.

Anonymous wrote:

Do you think being a condescending(sic) and sexist is helping your case here? Do you get off by insulting random women on the internet?

I am not making a case. I have you pegged, and that fact bothers you.

Please do not write things like "get off". It is sick. I want nothing to you, no matter what you want to think.

Do you think being a condescending(sic) and sexist is helping your case here? Do you get off by insulting random women on the internet?

Anonymous wrote:

Wow, triggered man alert

Honey, your English is not getting any better. For example, you wrote "triggered" when you meant "disappointed."

Please do not respond with "I wrote what I mean." First, you are trying to label my emotions to suit your needs. Next, you are trying to belittle another poster instead of owning your very easy-to-spot problems.

And this is not helping you become a better person or a better parent.

Wow, triggered man alert

Anonymous wrote:

Honey, I got it right this time.

Do you have every episode of "Outlander" saved? Most likely, yes. Do you picture yourself as the lovely heroine waiting to be found by the handsome hero (and I mean a human hero, not a pet)? Most likely, yes again.

Finally, do you have a favorite barstool (or two, depending on the current size of your bottom) saved at J. Gilbert's? Do you wait there for your handsome hero (but will settle for whatever will look your way)? Without a doubt.

Breaking news! Sexist misogynist says sexist misogynistic things - quelle surprise! Why are you spending your days trolling mommy forums? Most women on this site are married; your 'sad lonely cat lady' trope is uninspired and inapplicable.

There is a news flash. Sadly, you do not understand it. You have already been told (likely a number of times) by the founder of this site that dads were a part of it from the beginning.

However, you try to evade answering for your man-hating posts by asking stupid questions (e.g., Why are you on a site named 'DC Urban Mom and Dads' if you are a dad?).

Your bougie French (i.e., quelle surprise) hurts our eyes. Work on your English before branching out. Maybe listen to podcasts posted to help people like you learn to write better in English.

Even more, work on being a person your kids can be proud of, instead of someone who hates half the human race.

Honey, I got it right this time.

Do you have every episode of "Outlander" saved? Most likely, yes. Do you picture yourself as the lovely heroine waiting to be found by the handsome hero (and I mean a human hero, not a pet)? Most likely, yes again.

Finally, do you have a favorite barstool (or two, depending on the current size of your bottom) saved at J. Gilbert's? Do you wait there for your handsome hero (but will settle for whatever will look your way)? Without a doubt.

Breaking news! Sexist misogynist says sexist misogynistic things - quelle surprise! Why are you spending your days trolling mommy forums? Most women on this site are married; your 'sad lonely cat lady' trope is uninspired and inapplicable.

Anonymous wrote:

...you mean they are reaching for men who would never settle for them.

And it's good for everybody. We need these lonely, sad women around to avoid the collapse of the romantic novel industry.

Funny, stats say the majority of purchasers of romantic novels are women in relationships.

Your idea of a woman sitting at home reading as “lonely” and “sad” is more aptly described as “calm” and “peaceful”. But keep that misogyny going pal. Maybe you’ll get it right one of these days.

Honey, I got it right this time.

Do you have every episode of "Outlander" saved? Most likely, yes. Do you picture yourself as the lovely heroine waiting to be found by the handsome hero (and I mean a human hero, not a pet)? Most likely, yes again.

Finally, do you have a favorite barstool (or two, depending on the current size of your bottom) saved at J. Gilbert's? Do you wait there for your handsome hero (but will settle for whatever will look your way)? Without a doubt.