Anonymous wrote:Op - omg Americans Jfc
Get the freaking flu shot bc there is zero - and I mean zero - downside to doing so. Is it super effective against this strain of flu? Who knows. It doesn’t matter. The point is the flu is bad, and possibly without the shot I could have had a hospitalized kid.
I do not understand what is wrong with this country that this thread has become about the 2 seconds it takes to get stuck by a small needle and not about the highly aggressive disease it is designed to mitigate. Grow up, as a nation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another child has died from the flu.
Influencer Paul J. Kim’s 5-year-old son, Micah, died on Dec. 31, 2025, after contracting a severe case of the flu.
https://people.com/influencer-paul-j-kim-son-micah-dies-after-severe-case-of-flu-11877386
I came here to ask if anyone knows if he was vaccinated?
I can’t find any reliable source of information on that. Last year, 90% of the nearly 300 children who died from the flu were not vaccinated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another child has died from the flu.
Influencer Paul J. Kim’s 5-year-old son, Micah, died on Dec. 31, 2025, after contracting a severe case of the flu.
https://people.com/influencer-paul-j-kim-son-micah-dies-after-severe-case-of-flu-11877386
I came here to ask if anyone knows if he was vaccinated?
I can’t find any reliable source of information on that. Last year, 90% of the nearly 300 children who died from the flu were not vaccinated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another child has died from the flu.
Influencer Paul J. Kim’s 5-year-old son, Micah, died on Dec. 31, 2025, after contracting a severe case of the flu.
https://people.com/influencer-paul-j-kim-son-micah-dies-after-severe-case-of-flu-11877386
I came here to ask if anyone knows if he was vaccinated?
Anonymous wrote:Another child has died from the flu.
Influencer Paul J. Kim’s 5-year-old son, Micah, died on Dec. 31, 2025, after contracting a severe case of the flu.
https://people.com/influencer-paul-j-kim-son-micah-dies-after-severe-case-of-flu-11877386
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My daughter is a nurse at a hospital and they now have instructions to mask up on duty and possibly off.
I feel it's not so much for their own safety as not having to have half their workforce out, though.
Supposedly a bad Flu A, complicated by the fact that the last meeting of the people who decide what to put in the flu vaccine was canceled.
Maybe they really do just want to wipe a lot of vulnerable people off any government assistance they currently have.
I have had the flu once in my memory and it made me so weak I once had to rest halfway up the stairs for a few minutes just to will myself to climb the next 5 steps.
I was truly afraid because at the time I had actual kids at home and pets to feed.
I hate this admin. But I read that although that mtg was canceled, they still were able to use the most recent global data to make this year’s vaccine, which also aligned with the WHO recommendations. Other countries are having a rough flu season as well. I just don’t want anyone to feel discouraged to get the shot.
Anonymous wrote:My daughter is a nurse at a hospital and they now have instructions to mask up on duty and possibly off.
I feel it's not so much for their own safety as not having to have half their workforce out, though.
Supposedly a bad Flu A, complicated by the fact that the last meeting of the people who decide what to put in the flu vaccine was canceled.
Maybe they really do just want to wipe a lot of vulnerable people off any government assistance they currently have.
I have had the flu once in my memory and it made me so weak I once had to rest halfway up the stairs for a few minutes just to will myself to climb the next 5 steps.
I was truly afraid because at the time I had actual kids at home and pets to feed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I sometimes let myself think the DCUM set is more intelligent than average, but then a thread like this brings me back to reality. Get your flu shot every year. Even a poorly matched shot offers protection. This isn’t new information.
You do realize there is scant evidence for the flu shot’s effectiveness right? There is little statistical or anecdotal evidence despite this thing being given to hundreds of millions of people over 45 years.
It’s only people like you still supporting it. People who are particularly susceptible to marketing and think themselves smarter than they actually are. If they couldn’t advertise the shot anymore, people like you would never take it again.
Even a quick Google search pulls up any number of peer reviewed studies that show you're full of something. Hint: it's not knowledge.
In the realm of vaccines, the flu shot is not very effective.
But it's better than nothing.
One wonders how you define “effective” - effective in terms of preventing hospitalizations and death? Effective in terms of not being infected despite exposure? Effective in terms of turning your hair blue?
It matters.
The CDC reports that “early estimates of 2025–26 influenza vaccine effectiveness in England against influenza-associated hospitalization remained within expected ranges of 70%–75% for children and 30%–40% for adults, suggesting that influenza vaccination remains an effective tool in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations this season.”
So it’s definitely worth it.
It’s always estimates and never raw numbers. One of the vaccine makers favorite tricks.
Omg are you drinking the kool aid or what
You don’t find it one bit odd that you can easily find out how many people take the flu shot and how many people die of the flu, but we need to “estimate” how many people who took the flu shot died of the flu?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I sometimes let myself think the DCUM set is more intelligent than average, but then a thread like this brings me back to reality. Get your flu shot every year. Even a poorly matched shot offers protection. This isn’t new information.
You do realize there is scant evidence for the flu shot’s effectiveness right? There is little statistical or anecdotal evidence despite this thing being given to hundreds of millions of people over 45 years.
It’s only people like you still supporting it. People who are particularly susceptible to marketing and think themselves smarter than they actually are. If they couldn’t advertise the shot anymore, people like you would never take it again.
Even a quick Google search pulls up any number of peer reviewed studies that show you're full of something. Hint: it's not knowledge.
In the realm of vaccines, the flu shot is not very effective.
But it's better than nothing.
One wonders how you define “effective” - effective in terms of preventing hospitalizations and death? Effective in terms of not being infected despite exposure? Effective in terms of turning your hair blue?
It matters.
The CDC reports that “early estimates of 2025–26 influenza vaccine effectiveness in England against influenza-associated hospitalization remained within expected ranges of 70%–75% for children and 30%–40% for adults, suggesting that influenza vaccination remains an effective tool in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations this season.”
So it’s definitely worth it.
It’s always estimates and never raw numbers. One of the vaccine makers favorite tricks.
Omg are you drinking the kool aid or what
You don’t find it one bit odd that you can easily find out how many people take the flu shot and how many people die of the flu, but we need to “estimate” how many people who took the flu shot died of the flu?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I sometimes let myself think the DCUM set is more intelligent than average, but then a thread like this brings me back to reality. Get your flu shot every year. Even a poorly matched shot offers protection. This isn’t new information.
You do realize there is scant evidence for the flu shot’s effectiveness right? There is little statistical or anecdotal evidence despite this thing being given to hundreds of millions of people over 45 years.
It’s only people like you still supporting it. People who are particularly susceptible to marketing and think themselves smarter than they actually are. If they couldn’t advertise the shot anymore, people like you would never take it again.
Even a quick Google search pulls up any number of peer reviewed studies that show you're full of something. Hint: it's not knowledge.
In the realm of vaccines, the flu shot is not very effective.
But it's better than nothing.
One wonders how you define “effective” - effective in terms of preventing hospitalizations and death? Effective in terms of not being infected despite exposure? Effective in terms of turning your hair blue?
It matters.
The CDC reports that “early estimates of 2025–26 influenza vaccine effectiveness in England against influenza-associated hospitalization remained within expected ranges of 70%–75% for children and 30%–40% for adults, suggesting that influenza vaccination remains an effective tool in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations this season.”
So it’s definitely worth it.
It’s always estimates and never raw numbers. One of the vaccine makers favorite tricks.
Omg are you drinking the kool aid or what