Anonymous wrote:We actively discouraged HS sports for our two sons. Way too much time for any meaningful payoff in terms of college admissions. GPA is much more important than 4 years on the baseball team or whatever. Kids play club sports that don't have grueling travel schedules and focus on academics.
But we seem to be the minority. I'm baffled by the number of people I know whose kids spent 30+ hours a week around sports in HS. Very few will be recruited anywhere attractive and even among those who are, it's not uncommon to lose interest, get injured, etc and ultimately you may be stuck at a school that wouldn't have been optimal without the team aspect. I really think there is some kind of mania/obsession that sets in and skews perspectives.
Anonymous wrote:We actively discouraged HS sports for our two sons. Way too much time for any meaningful payoff in terms of college admissions. GPA is much more important than 4 years on the baseball team or whatever. Kids play club sports that don't have grueling travel schedules and focus on academics.
But we seem to be the minority. I'm baffled by the number of people I know whose kids spent 30+ hours a week around sports in HS. Very few will be recruited anywhere attractive and even among those who are, it's not uncommon to lose interest, get injured, etc and ultimately you may be stuck at a school that wouldn't have been optimal without the team aspect. I really think there is some kind of mania/obsession that sets in and skews perspectives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sports are not more important than other extracurriculars like music. And those go all year, not just a season. [/quote
And my kid did both sports and music/arts. If you’re not a recruit, it means nothing more than an extracurricular. Get ready.
This. If the kid is not going to play the sport in college (as a recruit) then the sport is of no more interest to the college than if the kid were in knitting club.
Anonymous wrote:Sports are not more important than other extracurriculars like music. And those go all year, not just a season.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sports are not more important than other extracurriculars like music. And those go all year, not just a season.
This is where parents of athletes lose perspective; being in a sport is not more important than other ECs. There seems to be a belief that sports should be considered the most important EC for college admissions, and it just isn't, nor should it be. Parents list all the sports that their kids are in, but parents of nonathletes generally don't list them because unless you are national award winner, the type of EC isn't important. It is the quality of your participation in it that matters in college admission - how long, do you have a leadership role, and does it fit your intended major?
My kid played 3 varsity sports in hs, captain of 2, mvp, all-state, all-met, but only had room on activities list to list 1 and that was at the bottom.Yes, sports was important to him, but not the most important thing he did during hs
WTH were his other activities?
Internship, robotics team, math team, STEM camp counselor, president of honor society, physics tutor....A bunch of stuff that related to his intended major (engineering) and showed his interests outside of school.
It sounds like BS.
When my DC played a sport, it required practice 4-5 times a week plus evenings and weekends for tournaments - at least 10 hours a week.
It takes a lot more hours to prep for math competitions. Our robotics team is 20hour/week commitment.
There is no way you can do all these activities meaningfully. They probably just created some fake clubs for college application. I hope admission officers see through this.
Anonymous wrote:We actively discouraged HS sports for our two sons. Way too much time for any meaningful payoff in terms of college admissions. GPA is much more important than 4 years on the baseball team or whatever. Kids play club sports that don't have grueling travel schedules and focus on academics.
But we seem to be the minority. I'm baffled by the number of people I know whose kids spent 30+ hours a week around sports in HS. Very few will be recruited anywhere attractive and even among those who are, it's not uncommon to lose interest, get injured, etc and ultimately you may be stuck at a school that wouldn't have been optimal without the team aspect. I really think there is some kind of mania/obsession that sets in and skews perspectives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here who said they matter. My kid played travel soccer and JV/V soccer all 4 years of HS. They were a referee and youth coach as well. They were captain of their travel team and their JV team. This was a significant and worthwhile endeavor, both on their applications and beyond. They were an excellent student and are now at a T20 school.
The bolded is why your kid got into a T20--not the athletics.
Anonymous wrote:In the other thread about cuts, everyone mentioned how you many kids on travel teams since 8 don’t pass freshman tryouts in high school. Even if your kid is lucky enough to make varsity, it doesn’t matter much for admissions. It’s just crazy when it’s so hard to make the high school team
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sports are not more important than other extracurriculars like music. And those go all year, not just a season.
This is where parents of athletes lose perspective; being in a sport is not more important than other ECs. There seems to be a belief that sports should be considered the most important EC for college admissions, and it just isn't, nor should it be. Parents list all the sports that their kids are in, but parents of nonathletes generally don't list them because unless you are national award winner, the type of EC isn't important. It is the quality of your participation in it that matters in college admission - how long, do you have a leadership role, and does it fit your intended major?
My kid played 3 varsity sports in hs, captain of 2, mvp, all-state, all-met, but only had room on activities list to list 1 and that was at the bottom.Yes, sports was important to him, but not the most important thing he did during hs
WTH were his other activities?
Internship, robotics team, math team, STEM camp counselor, president of honor society, physics tutor....A bunch of stuff that related to his intended major (engineering) and showed his interests outside of school.
Anonymous wrote:Who doesn’t have sports on the application? Almost all high school students do at least one sport.
There are dozens of schools that make it to state every year. You are not going to stand out unless you have something special.
Anonymous wrote:PP here who said they matter. My kid played travel soccer and JV/V soccer all 4 years of HS. They were a referee and youth coach as well. They were captain of their travel team and their JV team. This was a significant and worthwhile endeavor, both on their applications and beyond. They were an excellent student and are now at a T20 school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sports are not more important than other extracurriculars like music. And those go all year, not just a season.
This is where parents of athletes lose perspective; being in a sport is not more important than other ECs. There seems to be a belief that sports should be considered the most important EC for college admissions, and it just isn't, nor should it be. Parents list all the sports that their kids are in, but parents of nonathletes generally don't list them because unless you are national award winner, the type of EC isn't important. It is the quality of your participation in it that matters in college admission - how long, do you have a leadership role, and does it fit your intended major?