Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You have kids with 3 IBHL classes, maybe, on their HS transcript for college credit, and kids with 6-10 AP classes for college credit. You tell me which one is a better option for kids attending college? AP students learn how to write, they take English classes before the AP classes, just like the IB kids, and learn how to write and think about text. They do perfectly well in college. And they can either save money by needing one year less of college or open up space for a second major or more electives that they enjoy or for studying overseas and not worrying about jamming in required classes.
To be clear, I think you're not considering that IB HL courses consist of a pair of courses that are equivalent to two AP courses as a series in most cases. For example passing the IB English HL exam gives equivalent credit as passing both the AP Language and AP Lit exams. IB Math Analysis HL is equivalent to AP Precalculus AB and AP Calculus AB combined. IB History HL as APUSH and AP World, etc.
Still your point is stands, but it's not 3 IB college courses versus 6-10 AP college courses (actually IB allows a max of four HL).
You are misinformed about the credit IB gets. Link to a college external policy if you have one.
For example at UVA, Math HL only gets credit for one semester of calculus, AP Calculus BC is equivalent to two semesters.
Same with English and History, although some credit is for electives, so it’s an apples to oranges comparison.
Credit is more consistent for AP, and more variable for BC, but generally speaking a one year long AP class gets the same credit as a two year HL class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You have kids with 3 IBHL classes, maybe, on their HS transcript for college credit, and kids with 6-10 AP classes for college credit. You tell me which one is a better option for kids attending college? AP students learn how to write, they take English classes before the AP classes, just like the IB kids, and learn how to write and think about text. They do perfectly well in college. And they can either save money by needing one year less of college or open up space for a second major or more electives that they enjoy or for studying overseas and not worrying about jamming in required classes.
To be clear, I think you're not considering that IB HL courses consist of a pair of courses that are equivalent to two AP courses as a series in most cases. For example passing the IB English HL exam gives equivalent credit as passing both the AP Language and AP Lit exams. IB Math Analysis HL is equivalent to AP Precalculus AB and AP Calculus AB combined. IB History HL as APUSH and AP World, etc.
Still your point is stands, but it's not 3 IB college courses versus 6-10 AP college courses (actually IB allows a max of four HL).
Anonymous wrote:I would guess that more kids pupil place for AP then complete the IB diploma in any given year, which is ridiculous. Lewis had 4 kids complete the IB diploma last year. Four kids. There is no way you can justify the program benefiting the kids at Lewis. SLHS had 50, which is better but right about 10% of the class. How is that benefiting the students?
You should go speak at School Board meeting.
During the 2008 SL boundary, parents BEGGED to switch to AP. They were ignored. In fact, the SB was quite rude. I think that is why they now have speakers with their backs to the audience. They used to stand to the side so you could see them.
I would guess that more kids pupil place for AP then complete the IB diploma in any given year, which is ridiculous. Lewis had 4 kids complete the IB diploma last year. Four kids. There is no way you can justify the program benefiting the kids at Lewis. SLHS had 50, which is better but right about 10% of the class. How is that benefiting the students?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You have kids with 3 IBHL classes, maybe, on their HS transcript for college credit, and kids with 6-10 AP classes for college credit. You tell me which one is a better option for kids attending college? AP students learn how to write, they take English classes before the AP classes, just like the IB kids, and learn how to write and think about text. They do perfectly well in college. And they can either save money by needing one year less of college or open up space for a second major or more electives that they enjoy or for studying overseas and not worrying about jamming in required classes.
To be clear, I think you're not considering that IB HL courses consist of a pair of courses that are equivalent to two AP courses as a series in most cases. For example passing the IB English HL exam gives equivalent credit as passing both the AP Language and AP Lit exams. IB Math Analysis HL is equivalent to AP Precalculus AB and AP Calculus AB combined. IB History HL as APUSH and AP World, etc.
Still your point is stands, but it's not 3 IB college courses versus 6-10 AP college courses (actually IB allows a max of four HL).
Anonymous wrote:
You have kids with 3 IBHL classes, maybe, on their HS transcript for college credit, and kids with 6-10 AP classes for college credit. You tell me which one is a better option for kids attending college? AP students learn how to write, they take English classes before the AP classes, just like the IB kids, and learn how to write and think about text. They do perfectly well in college. And they can either save money by needing one year less of college or open up space for a second major or more electives that they enjoy or for studying overseas and not worrying about jamming in required classes.
Anonymous wrote:IB classes are harder to use for college credit for a series of reasons. Mainly, only IB HL classes count for college credit. Most kids will take HB SL classes. There are a certain number of IB HL classes required for the diploma, I believe that number is 3, and then the rest SL. The IB tests have to be taken in senior year to count for the diploma program. Not when kids complete the classes, but senior year. So any kid who is ahead in math has to wait at least one year to take the IB exam in math.
https://www.fcps.edu/academics/high/advanced-academics/international-baccalaureate)
The IB Career related program allows kids to take 2 IB courses and 2 career-related courses. This feels like a US based program to try and give a reason to keep IB since so few kids in the country actually complete the Diploma.
There are fewer IB class offerings then there are AP classes. I agree that AP has become ridiculous in its offerings and could easily be scaled back. AP is happy to add more classes and tests because that means more money for the program. This has been driven by parents who want their kids to have 18 AP classes, ok so an exaggeration there, to stand out for college. But the idea that kids can take different Ap Physics and Calculus classes, which reflect college availability, is a good thing.
https://www.ibo.org/programmes/diploma-programme/curriculum/individuals-and-societies/history/
There is an IB history class while there are AP US History, AP World History, AP European History, and AP African American Studies. That means there are 4 history classes that students can earn college credit in to one for IB. And again, that is only if your school offers IB HL classes.
In Science, there are 5 different AP Science options, IB offers 4 but, and this is key, many schools don't have the kids with the interest to take IB HL in science. For Math, there are 2 IB Math classes and 1 IB Computer Science class and you have to have enough kids for the HL classes. And while I think AP Precalculus is ridiculous, AP Calculus, AP Statistics, AP Computer Science you have more options.
You have kids with 3 IBHL classes, maybe, on their HS transcript for college credit, and kids with 6-10 AP classes for college credit. You tell me which one is a better option for kids attending college? AP students learn how to write, they take English classes before the AP classes, just like the IB kids, and learn how to write and think about text. They do perfectly well in college. And they can either save money by needing one year less of college or open up space for a second major or more electives that they enjoy or for studying overseas and not worrying about jamming in required classes.
I am sorry, but AP works well for more kids then IB and it helps kids reduce college expenses or allows kids more opportunities in college. DE English and History classes can meet the needs for IB English and History if parents think that is better then AP, that is an option across the county.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IB is one of the reasons why our society has so many issues. So much more could be done with our school curriculum is IB we taken out completely. Less is more!
It teaches critical thinking. That is what is sorely missing in today’s society.
Other courses teach critical thinking at lower cost, which is something you’d realize if you engaged in some critical thinking of your own.
The small number of IB advocates tout IB because they like the IB buzzwords (“global citizens.” “life-long learners,” etc), see IB as a school within their generally low-performing schools, or know IB is what provides them with the option to transfer their kids to AP schools.
None of this justifies the higher cost to FCPS.
The PP who praises the "critical thinking" that is "taught" in IB needs to apply a little of it to this issue.
First, the problem/issue: FCPS schools have two advanced programs. One is AP and the other is IB. IB is more expensive. Question: Is the additional expense justified?
The first step in "critical thinking" is to gather information. I do not have time right now to gather all the information from credible sources, but here is what I have learned so far:
Background information:
IB proponents claim that it better prepares students for college and "teaches" critical thinking. The costs to FCPS are higher. (I do not have time to research this--but I do know that in the past this question was asked by SB members and the costs were significantly higher.)
Historically, IB was placed in some underachieving FCPS schools in the hopes that it would attract "better" students. Except for one stunning example, this has not worked. Instead, it has resulted in allowing students from underperforming schools to pupil place in order to be in an AP or IB program.
Information needed:
Proof that IB better prepares students for college. We know that historically, the IB classes do not get as much credit in college as AP. Some claim that is changing.
How much more does it cost? What is the cost per pupil taking IB classes? Cost per pupil of those achieving the IB diploma?
Has there been any survey done with parents of students in FCPS over which they prefer? It would appear that there are more students pupil placing out of IB schools into AP than vice versa--with one glaring exception.
Just some thoughts for how to approach this--since PP claims that "critical thinking" is the justification for IB.
From the little detail that I know, I would say that the IB proponents could use a little instruction in "critical thinking."
Anonymous wrote:The only way IB ever would have taken off in FCPS would have been if they’d eliminated AP at the remaining schools. Otherwise the strength of peer groups always trumps programming.
IB may teach critical thinking but IB proponents falsely imply nothing else does, and they refuse to scrutinize the costs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IB is one of the reasons why our society has so many issues. So much more could be done with our school curriculum is IB we taken out completely. Less is more!
It teaches critical thinking. That is what is sorely missing in today’s society.
Other courses teach critical thinking at lower cost, which is something you’d realize if you engaged in some critical thinking of your own.
The small number of IB advocates tout IB because they like the IB buzzwords (“global citizens.” “life-long learners,” etc), see IB as a school within their generally low-performing schools, or know IB is what provides them with the option to transfer their kids to AP schools.
None of this justifies the higher cost to FCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IB is one of the reasons why our society has so many issues. So much more could be done with our school curriculum is IB we taken out completely. Less is more!
It teaches critical thinking. That is what is sorely missing in today’s society.
Other courses teach critical thinking at lower cost, which is something you’d realize if you engaged in some critical thinking of your own.
The small number of IB advocates tout IB because they like the IB buzzwords (“global citizens.” “life-long learners,” etc), see IB as a school within their generally low-performing schools, or know IB is what provides them with the option to transfer their kids to AP schools.
None of this justifies the higher cost to FCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IB is one of the reasons why our society has so many issues. So much more could be done with our school curriculum is IB we taken out completely. Less is more!
It teaches critical thinking. That is what is sorely missing in today’s society.