Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Wtf. Do you're saying its astonishingly evil, horrible and discriminatory to merely report basic demographics??? Aside from failing to answer the question and articulate how Asians were supposedly discriminated against... You've failed massively in your faux outrage here.

I'm saying I could care less if the percentage of Asians in a college student body is zero or 100%. All I care about is ethnicity not being a factor in determining an applicant's worthiness. This is the viewpoint of someone who isn't a bigot. You should try it.

100% Asian?

You are going to hear some major MAGA complaining

Even 45 -50 will get them howling.

Why would anyone care what MAGA thinks about something that pertains to college? If Harvard is 100% Asian because the top applicants were 100% Asian, so be it. You aren't going to change what is right and what is wrong by worrying about what "MAGA" idiots might think.

Once Harvard gets to be a certain percentage Asians, Asians are not going to want to go there anymore, they will begin to see the schools that elite white students go to as the new aspiration.

That's all fine and dandy. Everyone should freely apply to any school of their choice and no applicant should be discriminated against or given preferential treatment based on irrelevant personal identity characteristics. We can all agree on this. Good night.

You are impressive. Both MAGA losers and left wing liberals keep trying to derail your argument and throw out red herrings and ignore your very true statements, - for very different reasons - and you don’t fall for it. You speak the truth. Of course colleges should be selecting students on merit alone. This shouldn’t even be a question.

Anonymous wrote:The entire article is about how the parents are conservative and the kids are liberal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Wtf. Do you're saying its astonishingly evil, horrible and discriminatory to merely report basic demographics??? Aside from failing to answer the question and articulate how Asians were supposedly discriminated against... You've failed massively in your faux outrage here.

I'm saying I could care less if the percentage of Asians in a college student body is zero or 100%. All I care about is ethnicity not being a factor in determining an applicant's worthiness. This is the viewpoint of someone who isn't a bigot. You should try it.

100% Asian?

You are going to hear some major MAGA complaining

Even 45 -50 will get them howling.

Why would anyone care what MAGA thinks about something that pertains to college? If Harvard is 100% Asian because the top applicants were 100% Asian, so be it. You aren't going to change what is right and what is wrong by worrying about what "MAGA" idiots might think.

Once Harvard gets to be a certain percentage Asians, Asians are not going to want to go there anymore, they will begin to see the schools that elite white students go to as the new aspiration.

That's all fine and dandy. Everyone should freely apply to any school of their choice and no applicant should be discriminated against or given preferential treatment based on irrelevant personal identity characteristics. We can all agree on this. Good night.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Wtf. Do you're saying its astonishingly evil, horrible and discriminatory to merely report basic demographics??? Aside from failing to answer the question and articulate how Asians were supposedly discriminated against... You've failed massively in your faux outrage here.

I'm saying I could care less if the percentage of Asians in a college student body is zero or 100%. All I care about is ethnicity not being a factor in determining an applicant's worthiness. This is the viewpoint of someone who isn't a bigot. You should try it.

100% Asian?

You are going to hear some major MAGA complaining

Even 45 -50 will get them howling.

Why would anyone care what MAGA thinks about something that pertains to college? If Harvard is 100% Asian because the top applicants were 100% Asian, so be it. You aren't going to change what is right and what is wrong by worrying about what "MAGA" idiots might think.

DP The high number of Asians at American colleges are not American Asians. They are foreigners students. China alone graduates 7 million vs 3.9 million in the US in 2025. Trump has said he will allow 600,000 Chinese college students in to the US this year. That is 8% of Chinese graduates for the year.

All the slots at the top ten colleges in the US could easily be filled by Chinese students.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Wtf. Do you're saying its astonishingly evil, horrible and discriminatory to merely report basic demographics??? Aside from failing to answer the question and articulate how Asians were supposedly discriminated against... You've failed massively in your faux outrage here.

I'm saying I could care less if the percentage of Asians in a college student body is zero or 100%. All I care about is ethnicity not being a factor in determining an applicant's worthiness. This is the viewpoint of someone who isn't a bigot. You should try it.

100% Asian?

You are going to hear some major MAGA complaining

Even 45 -50 will get them howling.

Why would anyone care what MAGA thinks about something that pertains to college? If Harvard is 100% Asian because the top applicants were 100% Asian, so be it. You aren't going to change what is right and what is wrong by worrying about what "MAGA" idiots might think.

Once Harvard gets to be a certain percentage Asians, Asians are not going to want to go there anymore, they will begin to see the schools that elite white students go to as the new aspiration.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Wtf. Do you're saying its astonishingly evil, horrible and discriminatory to merely report basic demographics??? Aside from failing to answer the question and articulate how Asians were supposedly discriminated against... You've failed massively in your faux outrage here.

I'm saying I could care less if the percentage of Asians in a college student body is zero or 100%. All I care about is ethnicity not being a factor in determining an applicant's worthiness. This is the viewpoint of someone who isn't a bigot. You should try it.

100% Asian?

You are going to hear some major MAGA complaining

Even 45 -50 will get them howling.

Why would anyone care what MAGA thinks about something that pertains to college? If Harvard is 100% Asian because the top applicants were 100% Asian, so be it. You aren't going to change what is right and what is wrong by worrying about what "MAGA" idiots might think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Wtf. Do you're saying its astonishingly evil, horrible and discriminatory to merely report basic demographics??? Aside from failing to answer the question and articulate how Asians were supposedly discriminated against... You've failed massively in your faux outrage here.

I'm saying I could care less if the percentage of Asians in a college student body is zero or 100%. All I care about is ethnicity not being a factor in determining an applicant's worthiness. This is the viewpoint of someone who isn't a bigot. You should try it.

100% Asian?

You are going to hear some major MAGA complaining

Even 45 -50 will get them howling.

Why would anyone care what MAGA thinks about something that pertains to college? If Harvard is 100% Asian because the top applicants were 100% Asian, so be it. You aren't going to change what is right and what is wrong by worrying about what "MAGA" idiots might think.

DP The high number of Asians at American colleges are not American Asians. They are foreigners students. China alone graduates 7 million vs 3.9 million in the US in 2025. Trump has said he will allow 600,000 Chinese college students in to the US this year. That is 8% of Chinese graduates for the year.

All the slots at the top ten colleges in the US could easily be filled by Chinese students.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Wtf. Do you're saying its astonishingly evil, horrible and discriminatory to merely report basic demographics??? Aside from failing to answer the question and articulate how Asians were supposedly discriminated against... You've failed massively in your faux outrage here.

I'm saying I could care less if the percentage of Asians in a college student body is zero or 100%. All I care about is ethnicity not being a factor in determining an applicant's worthiness. This is the viewpoint of someone who isn't a bigot. You should try it.

100% Asian?

You are going to hear some major MAGA complaining

Even 45 -50 will get them howling.

Why would anyone care what MAGA thinks about something that pertains to college? If Harvard is 100% Asian because the top applicants were 100% Asian, so be it. You aren't going to change what is right and what is wrong by worrying about what "MAGA" idiots might think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Wtf. Do you're saying its astonishingly evil, horrible and discriminatory to merely report basic demographics??? Aside from failing to answer the question and articulate how Asians were supposedly discriminated against... You've failed massively in your faux outrage here.

I'm saying I could care less if the percentage of Asians in a college student body is zero or 100%. All I care about is ethnicity not being a factor in determining an applicant's worthiness. This is the viewpoint of someone who isn't a bigot. You should try it.

100% Asian?

You are going to hear some major MAGA complaining

Even 45 -50 will get them howling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Wtf. Do you're saying its astonishingly evil, horrible and discriminatory to merely report basic demographics??? Aside from failing to answer the question and articulate how Asians were supposedly discriminated against... You've failed massively in your faux outrage here.

I'm saying I could care less if the percentage of Asians in a college student body is zero or 100%. All I care about is ethnicity not being a factor in determining an applicant's worthiness. This is the viewpoint of someone who isn't a bigot. You should try it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Doesn't mesh with the bogus rhetoric about how the liberal elite are supposedly racists who hate Asians so you find some other bogus thing to complain about. Lame.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone was railing about "Harvard discriminates against Asians" - doesn't take much to see that US demographics are 7% Asian whereas Harvard student body is almost 24% Asian. How can it be "discrimination" when Asians have had admissions rates 3.5x more favorable than the general population?

The fact that you know the student body is 24% Asian is the root of the problem itself. Who is keeping tabs on the student body demographics and why are they doing so? The student body should be made up of the most qualified applicants. Period, end of discussion. If that means the student body is 98% Asian or 2% Asian, so be it. Being "Asian" should not be a qualifying or disqualifying factor.

It's just astonishing to hear of ethnicity being something taken into consideration when people are applying for anything in 2025. What is wrong with these people?

Wtf. Do you're saying its astonishingly evil, horrible and discriminatory to merely report basic demographics??? Aside from failing to answer the question and articulate how Asians were supposedly discriminated against... You've failed massively in your faux outrage here.

Anonymous wrote:Who cares?

If any minority wants snuggle up with MAGA, they had better be prepared to ride bare back on this bull.

I'll be enjoying watching them squirm.