Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.

Awful. But water finds its own level.

sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.

DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.

well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?

That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.

And firstly focused on EXCLUSION.

Even their damn non-free alumni events you can’t bring a best friend who lives in the same town you flew in to to attend a drinks event.

Anonymous wrote:I think ex-sorrority girls probably make great wives. They’re pretty well rounded by the time they get out of college. They’ve had to focus on everything from academic achievement to community service, community building, being a part of something, etc. They also care about their appearance and learn to work within a beauty biased environment - which can be tough.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.

Awful. But water finds its own level.

sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.

DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.

well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?

That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.

Awful. But water finds its own level.

sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.

Ha! I went to Wellesley. No Greek life.

Were you a lesbian even before going to Wellesley? (not that there’s anything wrong with that).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.

Awful. But water finds its own level.

sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.

Ha! I went to Wellesley. No Greek life.

Were you a lesbian even before going to Wellesley? (not that there’s anything wrong with that).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.

Awful. But water finds its own level.

sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.

DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.

well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?

That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.

Anonymous wrote:They’re usually wh*res, so that’s not really wife material for most men but maybe you have low standards.

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.

Awful. But water finds its own level.

sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.

DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.

well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?

That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.

so it's always about race - you sound a bit gross and racist yourself

You could think about what PP said, or you could get triggered when called out on it.

I think the person who needs a trigger warning is the one who got upset by the description of sorority girls as pretty, family oriented, social, and so forth. like it or not, that is how sorority girls are perceived.

She disagreed with you and explained why. You just name called.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.

Awful. But water finds its own level.

sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.

DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.

well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?

That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.

so it's always about race - you sound a bit gross and racist yourself

You could think about what PP said, or you could get triggered when called out on it.

I think the person who needs a trigger warning is the one who got upset by the description of sorority girls as pretty, family oriented, social, and so forth. like it or not, that is how sorority girls are perceived.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.

Awful. But water finds its own level.

sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.

DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.

well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?

That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.

so it's always about race - you sound a bit gross and racist yourself

You could think about what PP said, or you could get triggered when called out on it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.

Awful. But water finds its own level.

sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.

DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.

well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?

That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.

so it's always about race - you sound a bit gross and racist yourself

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.

Awful. But water finds its own level.

sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.

DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.

well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?

That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.