Anonymous wrote:Another vote for Langley
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We chose St. Andrew's because it was supposed to have nice kids, and we have been incredibly disappointed on that front. I think it all might depend on the class.
+1 This was precisely why we chose St. Andrew’s and was exactly our sentiment, “incredibly disappointed on that front”. We ended up leaving the school.
Anonymous wrote:I have an 8yo DD and trying to decide what is best for her. She has two older siblings both thriving in FCPS. My DD is more shy and less confident. She in the AAP program and getting what she needs academically. We are at an AAP center with strong science, math, engineering, band and orchestra. This area (McLean) is very competitive and I don’t think this is the necessarily the best environment for her.
The kids we know who are at certain private schools are not the nicest kids so not sure if those schools would even be better for our daughter. DD plays sports but not at a competitive level. She swims, plays tennis, soccer, golf and soccer at a very beginner level.
What schools are known for having really nice kids?
DD has had some issues with friends this year and think this would be a good excuse to try private. DH thinks the private school mean girls will be worse.
Anonymous wrote:We chose St. Andrew's because it was supposed to have nice kids, and we have been incredibly disappointed on that front. I think it all might depend on the class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We chose St. Andrew's because it was supposed to have nice kids, and we have been incredibly disappointed on that front. I think it all might depend on the class.
Every school depends on the class
This. One year might have lots of nice kids. Another year might not have as many.
This is true. Definitely depends on the class.
Aren’t all the problem kids in public?
Fascinating.
The disruptive or violent kids are in public. The admissions team weeds them out effectively and kids do get kicked out of private.
The behavior problems in private are more subtle like mean girl behavior or low key bullying. It is unfortunate and harder to deal with. It exists in public too of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem with privates is that the toxic kids have a lot more power, and tend to have a ripple effect so that a few bad kids can control the culture of the entire grade. So even if 90% of the kids are nice, the overall experience is bad.
Stay in public! if you are worried about academic rigor, just do AAP and load on honors and AP classes in HS!
We have three kids who have been in both and public always is a way more pleasant experience.
This is very good advice
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Burgundy Farm. My kid started in sixth grade, and it is a warm, accepting and kind culture. Kids are kids but the culture is stated and emphasized.
DC’s bestie in MS left Burgundy Farm after poorly handled bullying incidents.
This was pre-Covid, so it’s been years, and I don’t say this as a ding on Burgundy Farm, which I’ve also heard great things about. I say it only to emphasize what other commenters have said — it depends entirely on any given class or grade in any given year.