Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s going to Shepherd.

Wow. Why the lateral move? Bizarre.

He's done well at H-A. We loved him, our kid responded to his leadership style.

What's the intel on Bigelow at Mann?

Anonymous wrote:He’s going to Shepherd.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Devastated Principal Hooks is leaving Hyde-Addison. What’s the intel on Mann’s AP Kimberly Bigelow? She’s been named interim.

Why are you devastated over this? There are so many other pressing things going on in the world. People change jobs all of the time.

Devastated because with all the other things going on in the world, knowing my child was in a supportive and safe environment was helpful. Having my kid at a school with a leader unafraid to champion DEI in the current environment was one thing that helped my mental health. I’m sure things will be ok, and I’m sure not everyone is sad he’s going, but personally was hoping we’d have him for a few more years.

Any idea what’s next for him? I hope he stays in the district.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Devastated Principal Hooks is leaving Hyde-Addison. What’s the intel on Mann’s AP Kimberly Bigelow? She’s been named interim.

Why are you devastated over this? There are so many other pressing things going on in the world. People change jobs all of the time.

Devastated because with all the other things going on in the world, knowing my child was in a supportive and safe environment was helpful. Having my kid at a school with a leader unafraid to champion DEI in the current environment was one thing that helped my mental health. I’m sure things will be ok, and I’m sure not everyone is sad he’s going, but personally was hoping we’d have him for a few more years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Devastated Principal Hooks is leaving Hyde-Addison. What’s the intel on Mann’s AP Kimberly Bigelow? She’s been named interim.

Why are you devastated over this? There are so many other pressing things going on in the world. People change jobs all of the time.

Anonymous wrote:Devastated Principal Hooks is leaving Hyde-Addison. What’s the intel on Mann’s AP Kimberly Bigelow? She’s been named interim.

Anonymous wrote:Devastated Principal Hooks is leaving Hyde-Addison. What’s the intel on Mann’s AP Kimberly Bigelow? She’s been named interim.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anytime a black woman or a black man is a no nonsense type of leader, certain no-black folks have a problem with it.

Anytime a black woman or man is criticized, some folks insist the criticism has to be racially-motivated.

Because most of the time it is racially motivated. Black folks have to work ten times as hard as other non-black folks who are mediocre. The threshold is set extremely low for non-black folks but set extremely high for black folks.

I genuinely do not think this is true in DCPS leadership.

+1

You have Andria Caruthers who admits to ethics violations and fraud/double dipping and she just goes “oh, oops, sorry, I didn’t know” and marches on like nothing happened. So what would it be called to ask for or expect her resignation?

It’s a feature, not a bug. She worked for Relay. Now that she’s trained by Relay and employed by Relay, DCPS doesn’t need to pay for Relay. They get two for the price of one.

Ummm ok Andria. There’s more to the story. Just Google.

You don’t think DCPS keeps her because it’s financially beneficial?

DP - No, because for that to be true, Relay would have to be beneficial.

DCPS thinks it is to the point of saying we are a Relay district. So if you have someone who has all the knowledge, training, and institutional knowledge of a program, would you fire them and pay for the program or give them a (relatively) quiet slap on the wrist and get their knowledge for free? This is a no brainer if you are DCPS.

So, again, this sounds like a low bar for DCPS, not a high bar?

Absolutely. I never said it was a high bar. It just explains how DCPS justified keeping a terrible leader with documented ethics violations. Worth another thread if you want to start one but we should derail this thread.

Probably a new mayor with a new chancellor will sweet out the bad apples. (And maybe hire new bad apples lol)

She is just awful! I do not understand why they simply do not say she’s found ‘something else’ and get rid of her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anytime a black woman or a black man is a no nonsense type of leader, certain no-black folks have a problem with it.

Anytime a black woman or man is criticized, some folks insist the criticism has to be racially-motivated.

Because most of the time it is racially motivated. Black folks have to work ten times as hard as other non-black folks who are mediocre. The threshold is set extremely low for non-black folks but set extremely high for black folks.

I genuinely do not think this is true in DCPS leadership.

+1

You have Andria Caruthers who admits to ethics violations and fraud/double dipping and she just goes “oh, oops, sorry, I didn’t know” and marches on like nothing happened. So what would it be called to ask for or expect her resignation?

It’s a feature, not a bug. She worked for Relay. Now that she’s trained by Relay and employed by Relay, DCPS doesn’t need to pay for Relay. They get two for the price of one.

Ummm ok Andria. There’s more to the story. Just Google.

You don’t think DCPS keeps her because it’s financially beneficial?

DP - No, because for that to be true, Relay would have to be beneficial.

DCPS thinks it is to the point of saying we are a Relay district. So if you have someone who has all the knowledge, training, and institutional knowledge of a program, would you fire them and pay for the program or give them a (relatively) quiet slap on the wrist and get their knowledge for free? This is a no brainer if you are DCPS.

So, again, this sounds like a low bar for DCPS, not a high bar?

Absolutely. I never said it was a high bar. It just explains how DCPS justified keeping a terrible leader with documented ethics violations. Worth another thread if you want to start one but we should derail this thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cap hill lucked up. Gray is a very efficient leader.

Not the person the panel recommended. Wonder if their first choice candidate is going elsewhere or DCPS overruled them. After all their bad luck with the old principal, lame to do a panel and then not give them their first choice.

Our AP said it’s not an assignment, it’s a mutual decision. So if the panel ranks a candidate #1 but that candidate declines, it’s just the way it is.

Your AP is mistaken. Panels don't rank candidates. They don't vote. They don't even give a recommendation. They give feedback - positive and negative - for each panelist they see. And based on that, the Instructional Superintendent gives their rec to the Chancellor. The Chancellor makes the final decision.

They only said it’s a mutual decision. Are you saying the candidate doesn’t get to decide at all and are just placed by the Chancellor?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cap hill lucked up. Gray is a very efficient leader.

Not the person the panel recommended. Wonder if their first choice candidate is going elsewhere or DCPS overruled them. After all their bad luck with the old principal, lame to do a panel and then not give them their first choice.

Our AP said it’s not an assignment, it’s a mutual decision. So if the panel ranks a candidate #1 but that candidate declines, it’s just the way it is.

Your AP is mistaken. Panels don't rank candidates. They don't vote. They don't even give a recommendation. They give feedback - positive and negative - for each panelist they see. And based on that, the Instructional Superintendent gives their rec to the Chancellor. The Chancellor makes the final decision.