Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women love to try and shame men for not wanting to marry a skank - "stop being so insecure!" - but it's never going to work, sorry.

You'll never stop being insecure? Quite clear.

Men are never going to stop not wanting to marry skanks. Clear yet?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women love to try and shame men for not wanting to marry a skank - "stop being so insecure!" - but it's never going to work, sorry.

You'll never stop being insecure? Quite clear.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Financial history a definite yes. If someone has zero savings and huge credit card debt that’s a big issue because it could really affect me going forward. Sexual history is in the past. Don’t ask don’t tell.

People who think like this are women. No guy would be proud that his wife to be slept with 50+ guys prior to marrying him. The past does matter for both men and women. Two people who are about to get married should be an open book, and nothing is off limit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women love to try and shame men for not wanting to marry a skank - "stop being so insecure!" - but it's never going to work, sorry.

You'll never stop being insecure? Quite clear.

Imagine you are an EVP at a F100 company attending a company event with your wife. You found out at the event that your wife slept with the whole fraternity in college, and that several of those frat guys are working for you. They said behind your back that your wife was a wh**e in college. How are you going to react to this? Still feeing secure?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women love to try and shame men for not wanting to marry a skank - "stop being so insecure!" - but it's never going to work, sorry.

You'll never stop being insecure? Quite clear.

Imagine you are an EVP at a F100 company attending a company event with your wife. You found out at the event that your wife slept with the whole fraternity in college, and that several of those frat guys are working for you. They said behind your back that your wife was a wh**e in college. How are you going to react to this? Still feeing secure?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women love to try and shame men for not wanting to marry a skank - "stop being so insecure!" - but it's never going to work, sorry.

You'll never stop being insecure? Quite clear.

Anonymous wrote:Women love to try and shame men for not wanting to marry a skank - "stop being so insecure!" - but it's never going to work, sorry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So you dont have a real definition, and just decide if its arbitrarily too many people?

People are more complicated and significant than the beds they've slept in. People that think like this sound like you want to pick up your next gf from the playground and make sure she's never had a better lover than you. Insecurity at its finest.

Dear Ho,

You are dense. First, what is a "real definition" of promiscuity? Answer - It is what a person defines it to be. You would likely set your "number" much higher than most people. Ditto with "financially secure", unless you are talking about outliers such as billionaires.

I never wrote about that I was worried that a woman might have a partner who was a better lover. You made that up. Why? Because you are very triggered about this topic due to the large amount of baggage you have about this subject.

C'mon. Look how quickly you respond. You have been run through. Everyone reading this board notices it.

Dude. What are you doing on a mommy message board?

Anonymous wrote:Women love to try and shame men for not wanting to marry a skank - "stop being so insecure!" - but it's never going to work, sorry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Financial yes, sexual history no. Unless his history includes sex with men. That I would want to know.

Wow, that’s about the most self-serving formulation I’ve seen on this thread. Ultimately, the real issue here is that most women think it’s illegitimate for a man to be concerned about a woman’s sexual past, full stop, but literally everything else is fair game. OP’s attempt to couple sex and financial issues, while admittedly cheeky, is not going to change anyone’s mind on this. Men see these issues as of similar importance, and women will fight to the death rather than admit that sexual history is something a man has any right to care about. There is a real conflict of interest on the sexual history issue, women don’t want to have their pasts held against them and men don’t want to be the guy she settles for but isn’t actually that attracted to.

There it is - the waving red flag of insecurity. Just because someone has had sex with other people in the past doesn't mean a woman is "settling" for you. What a sad sad point of view and negative self view! You think no woman could possibly attracted to you AND have had sex with others before you?

Do you think a woman should disclose that she had slept with the entire fraternity to her potential future husband?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Financial yes, sexual history no. Unless his history includes sex with men. That I would want to know.

Wow, that’s about the most self-serving formulation I’ve seen on this thread. Ultimately, the real issue here is that most women think it’s illegitimate for a man to be concerned about a woman’s sexual past, full stop, but literally everything else is fair game. OP’s attempt to couple sex and financial issues, while admittedly cheeky, is not going to change anyone’s mind on this. Men see these issues as of similar importance, and women will fight to the death rather than admit that sexual history is something a man has any right to care about. There is a real conflict of interest on the sexual history issue, women don’t want to have their pasts held against them and men don’t want to be the guy she settles for but isn’t actually that attracted to.

There it is - the waving red flag of insecurity. Just because someone has had sex with other people in the past doesn't mean a woman is "settling" for you. What a sad sad point of view and negative self view! You think no woman could possibly attracted to you AND have had sex with others before you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Financial yes, sexual history no. Unless his history includes sex with men. That I would want to know.

Wow, that’s about the most self-serving formulation I’ve seen on this thread. Ultimately, the real issue here is that most women think it’s illegitimate for a man to be concerned about a woman’s sexual past, full stop, but literally everything else is fair game. OP’s attempt to couple sex and financial issues, while admittedly cheeky, is not going to change anyone’s mind on this. Men see these issues as of similar importance, and women will fight to the death rather than admit that sexual history is something a man has any right to care about. There is a real conflict of interest on the sexual history issue, women don’t want to have their pasts held against them and men don’t want to be the guy she settles for but isn’t actually that attracted to.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Financial yes, sexual history no. Unless his history includes sex with men. That I would want to know.

Wow, that’s about the most self-serving formulation I’ve seen on this thread. Ultimately, the real issue here is that most women think it’s illegitimate for a man to be concerned about a woman’s sexual past, full stop, but literally everything else is fair game. OP’s attempt to couple sex and financial issues, while admittedly cheeky, is not going to change anyone’s mind on this. Men see these issues as of similar importance, and women will fight to the death rather than admit that sexual history is something a man has any right to care about. There is a real conflict of interest on the sexual history issue, women don’t want to have their pasts held against them and men don’t want to be the guy she settles for but isn’t actually that attracted to.