Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:118 pounds at 5'0 is a normal BMI for a woman.
It’s not thin though. For reference I am 5’8” and 124. BMI 18. That is slim. She is a full 8 inches shorter and only 6 pounds lighter. She may still be plenty attractive but slim she is not.
Anonymous wrote:118 pounds at 5'0 is a normal BMI for a woman.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're short and fat. And you won't date short men. And the tall men can do waaaaay better. I can't believe you didn't figure this out on your own.
OP is slim. The rest is true.
38F on a 5 feet frame would not look slim usually.
OMG. She's a 38 year old female! She said she weighed 118lbs.
Hang your head in shame and learn to read internet terms.
That’s hilarious that some dude thought this was her bra size.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're short and fat. And you won't date short men. And the tall men can do waaaaay better. I can't believe you didn't figure this out on your own.
OP is slim. The rest is true.
38F on a 5 feet frame would not look slim usually.
OMG. She's a 38 year old female! She said she weighed 118lbs.
Hang your head in shame and learn to read internet terms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But OP is not attracted to short men. OP, keep your standards. I agree with removing the picture with your niece. Do NOT increase the age, you don't want kids with someone who is almost 60.
They're not standards, they're preferences. Calling a height preference a standard makes it seem like people are encouraging her to give a dishonest person a chance.
I get it. However, OP is attracted to taller than average guys. She cannot force herself to be intimate with someone who is not attractive to her.
Anonymous wrote:OP you are still married. Men wanting children will not match with you.
When will the divorce be final?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did you set your filters
What do your photos look like
What does your profile say
My filters are:
Must have undergrad and/or graduate degree
Height: 5’9 - 6’4
Open to children
Distance: 30 miles
I have recent photos from my trip in Europe; full body shots of me sight seeing; a picture of me with my niece; picture of me in a dress on the beach
Unfortunately your education requirement is limiting. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a good criterion to have, but it’s a well-known phenomenon that women are now better educated than men.
“Open to children” might tell a guy you want them. That is going to narrow your pool more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ditch photo with niece
Set age filter to 55
Reduce height requirement
Uh, no. You are better off single forever than taking on a man 17 years older than you. If you really want to have kids, having them as a true single mom is way better than having little kids plus an elderly husband to care for.
OP, it's natural that you feel your biological clock ticking, but remember that no husband is sooooooo much better than a bad husband.
55 is not elderly FFS he has a good 20-25 years run ahead of him.
Anonymous wrote:Also remove any selfies and bathroom mirror pics. Those are my instant swipe lefts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But OP is not attracted to short men. OP, keep your standards. I agree with removing the picture with your niece. Do NOT increase the age, you don't want kids with someone who is almost 60.
They're not standards, they're preferences. Calling a height preference a standard makes it seem like people are encouraging her to give a dishonest person a chance.