Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Darwin Award Winner!

NO, because he'd already spread his semen into the gene pool.

It frustrates me when people invoke this 'Darwin award' nonsense anytime a stupid human does stupid human things and unalives themselves as a result.

Darwin would ONLY apply if the person had never bred themselves into the gene pool.

Darwin is about REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS. This guy already shared his stupid with a daughter and she will doubtless share it with other little morons ad infinitum.

Save your hilarious indignation-the people aren't wrong in referencing it- you are. Children are not a disqualifier. The Darwin Awards covers the five rules of the award and addresses the issue: https://darwinawards.com/rules/rules1a.html

Follow the logic, as per your last statement- all is not lost! The progeny are not ruled out from winning one day.

How do we start a change.org petition so that PP's criteria are used instead? PP has never made a mistake before and it's not time to start.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
What jerks with horses and dogs do to foxes is far worse than what happens with animals raised to be food. Keep lying to yourself. Hunting deer that cause too many problems to our environment is also different from what you fools do to foxes with your horses and dogs.

No one is actually fox hunting anymore. The hounds just chase the fox around and the riders chase the hounds around. Once the fox goes to ground nothing goes into the burrow to get them. And these hounds are way slower than the foxes. It’s just an excuse to ride your horse, have some fellowship, and then drink after the hunt.

That's what the fox hunters want people to believe. The reality is they encourage the dogs to tear the foxes apart limb by limb.
The foxes are running for their lives. If they don't get away from a huge pack of long legged, much bigger dogs, they get torn apart while they're still alive. I learned this from someone on the inside of this world. It ain't called a blood sport for nothing.

Clearly neither of you loons have been foxhunting. Even back in the mid 80s when I first went foxhunting that wasn't the case. I am on the inside of this world, you're just making stuff up to suit your narrative.

I grew up in that world. There are plenty of times when hounds have "accidentally" catch and rip a fox apart: it's common practice, and some groups have zero intention of making sure it doesn't happen; they encourage it. Not every hunt and every group, but plenty. This has been happening for years and it happens today, both in the US and UK.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Darwin Award Winner!

NO, because he'd already spread his semen into the gene pool.

It frustrates me when people invoke this 'Darwin award' nonsense anytime a stupid human does stupid human things and unalives themselves as a result.

Darwin would ONLY apply if the person had never bred themselves into the gene pool.

Darwin is about REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS. This guy already shared his stupid with a daughter and she will doubtless share it with other little morons ad infinitum.

Save your hilarious indignation-the people aren't wrong in referencing it- you are. Children are not a disqualifier. The Darwin Awards covers the five rules of the award and addresses the issue: https://darwinawards.com/rules/rules1a.html

Follow the logic, as per your last statement- all is not lost! The progeny are not ruled out from winning one day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Darwin Award Winner!

NO, because he'd already spread his semen into the gene pool.

It frustrates me when people invoke this 'Darwin award' nonsense anytime a stupid human does stupid human things and unalives themselves as a result.

Darwin would ONLY apply if the person had never bred themselves into the gene pool.

Darwin is about REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS. This guy already shared his stupid with a daughter and she will doubtless share it with other little morons ad infinitum.

I am sure he was still considering reproducing.

Again, he successfully passed his genes to a next generation before dying. So not a Darwin Award winner. Those are (mostly) young morons who unalive themselves in foolish fashion before successfully reproducing.

Reminds me of the Italian restaurant near the bull fighting ring in Spain. A tourist was curious as to why one plate of spaghetti had huge meatballs. The owner said that it was because they were testicles from the bull that lost in the arena that day. Wow, said the tourist, how does one get that dish? The owner said there is a sign-up sheet, how long are you in town for? 2 weeks said the tourist so the owner was able to sign the tourist up for his last night in town. Fast forward 2 weeks and the tourist is back at the restaurant waiting for his special dish. The owner brings out the spaghetti dinner and the meatballs are small. The tourist said, I thought I was going to get the special meal with the bull’s testicles. The owner said you did get the special dish, it contains the testicles of the loser in the ring. It doesn’t happen often but today the bull won.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past, apex predators culled the herd but now hunters kill apex predators like wolves. I think people who kill these beautiful animals are missing something that makes one human. The big game hunters are usually people with too much money and low intelligence. Trump's sons, for example.

Civilization is a thin veneer. If these folks could get away with it they would probably be preying on humans. They enjoy killing.

Never heard of the military?

Anonymous wrote:Dude was only 52. He looks 70 in the pictures accompanying the article.

Being outdoors and sun exposure is rough on skin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Darwin Award Winner!

NO, because he'd already spread his semen into the gene pool.

It frustrates me when people invoke this 'Darwin award' nonsense anytime a stupid human does stupid human things and unalives themselves as a result.

Darwin would ONLY apply if the person had never bred themselves into the gene pool.

Darwin is about REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS. This guy already shared his stupid with a daughter and she will doubtless share it with other little morons ad infinitum.

I am sure he was still considering reproducing.

I don’t trust people who say “let’s go kill living creatures for fun” they can say it’s about conservation or its ethical because they eat it but the reality is they like killing.

I find it baffling that there are still people into "big game hunting." The Trump boys are into this too. I don't understand it at all. There is nothing sporting or manly or athletic about pulling a trigger on a large, often endangered animal. This isn't hunting for food. It's just killing for the sake of killing. These people are psychopaths. The fact that the animal got the better of this man is nice karma.

Anonymous wrote:Darwin Award Winner!

NO, because he'd already spread his semen into the gene pool.

It frustrates me when people invoke this 'Darwin award' nonsense anytime a stupid human does stupid human things and unalives themselves as a result.

Darwin would ONLY apply if the person had never bred themselves into the gene pool.

Darwin is about REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS. This guy already shared his stupid with a daughter and she will doubtless share it with other little morons ad infinitum.