Are you going to continue avoiding citing the part of the bible that says masturbation is a sin?
Put up or shut up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My wife claims not to have one, but does use hands on occasion. But would be fine if she wanted one. Not a huge drive.

Should I suggest it?

Why wouldn't you? Or just buy one for her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In my friend group it's 50%. Only 2 in my friend group of 5 own one. Since one mom in this group is super religious( no self pleasure in her belief system), she doesn't count because that's probably rare. But the two with vibrators each own more than 2 vibrators. So it averages out to 1 per mom?

If my super religious friend is representative of religious moms who don't own vibrators due to belief systems, their husbands are lucky. She never stays mad at her husband because she needs him as no other form of release is acceptable/ moral. 😀

Good for your religious friend! This is how it’s supposed to be.

Can you please piss off to www.sanctimonioustwats.com? Or some other hyper religious forum for your ilk?

I m not perfect in any way. But what I don’t understand is why people on this forum encourage immoral behavior and get upset when someone encourages moral behavior

I would be with you if the behavior we were talking about was cheating or something… but calling masturbation immoral is a stretch, and the religions that do so have a history of keeping women subservient. So I’m with the PP. Pleasure yourself or don’t, I don’t care, but don’t be all sanctimonious on those who think it’s a beautiful thing.

Masturbation is a sin, it may not be as bad as cheating but still it is a sin.

I’m not religious and don’t believe in the concept of sin, so none of this applies to me.

Just because you don’t believe in something doesn’t make it not true

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In my friend group it's 50%. Only 2 in my friend group of 5 own one. Since one mom in this group is super religious( no self pleasure in her belief system), she doesn't count because that's probably rare. But the two with vibrators each own more than 2 vibrators. So it averages out to 1 per mom?

If my super religious friend is representative of religious moms who don't own vibrators due to belief systems, their husbands are lucky. She never stays mad at her husband because she needs him as no other form of release is acceptable/ moral. 😀

Good for your religious friend! This is how it’s supposed to be.

Can you please piss off to www.sanctimonioustwats.com? Or some other hyper religious forum for your ilk?

I m not perfect in any way. But what I don’t understand is why people on this forum encourage immoral behavior and get upset when someone encourages moral behavior

I would be with you if the behavior we were talking about was cheating or something… but calling masturbation immoral is a stretch, and the religions that do so have a history of keeping women subservient. So I’m with the PP. Pleasure yourself or don’t, I don’t care, but don’t be all sanctimonious on those who think it’s a beautiful thing.

Masturbation is a sin, it may not be as bad as cheating but still it is a sin.

I’m not religious and don’t believe in the concept of sin, so none of this applies to me.

Just because you don’t believe in something doesn’t make it not true

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In my friend group it's 50%. Only 2 in my friend group of 5 own one. Since one mom in this group is super religious( no self pleasure in her belief system), she doesn't count because that's probably rare. But the two with vibrators each own more than 2 vibrators. So it averages out to 1 per mom?

If my super religious friend is representative of religious moms who don't own vibrators due to belief systems, their husbands are lucky. She never stays mad at her husband because she needs him as no other form of release is acceptable/ moral. 😀

Good for your religious friend! This is how it’s supposed to be.

Can you please piss off to www.sanctimonioustwats.com? Or some other hyper religious forum for your ilk?

I m not perfect in any way. But what I don’t understand is why people on this forum encourage immoral behavior and get upset when someone encourages moral behavior

I would be with you if the behavior we were talking about was cheating or something… but calling masturbation immoral is a stretch, and the religions that do so have a history of keeping women subservient. So I’m with the PP. Pleasure yourself or don’t, I don’t care, but don’t be all sanctimonious on those who think it’s a beautiful thing.

Masturbation is a sin, it may not be as bad as cheating but still it is a sin.

It’s a sin. She’s just telling it like it is. Truth may not be popular, but it’s still the truth. Good for her for calling it out.

What about mutual masturbation?

That’s okay as long as you are doing to each other. Don’t do it to yourself

What about if a woman touches her own cl1t or nipples while her husband’s penis is inside her vagina?

Yes! Also what if the wife wears a plug while her husband goes down on her?

And for prostate health, is it okay if the husband has vaginal intercourse but then pulls out and finishes himself on her face? Does this still confer health benefits?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard Research finding:

"Compared to men who reported 4–7 ejaculations per month across their lifetimes, men who ejaculated 21 or more times a month enjoyed a 31% lower risk of prostate cancer."

So unmarried (religious) men should just accept a higher chance of prostate cancer instead of causing ejaculations on their own?

Risk of prostate cancer is reduced only through sexual intercourse. Masturbation doesn’t offer the same benefits

So pre-marital sex is basically a health requirement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In my friend group it's 50%. Only 2 in my friend group of 5 own one. Since one mom in this group is super religious( no self pleasure in her belief system), she doesn't count because that's probably rare. But the two with vibrators each own more than 2 vibrators. So it averages out to 1 per mom?

If my super religious friend is representative of religious moms who don't own vibrators due to belief systems, their husbands are lucky. She never stays mad at her husband because she needs him as no other form of release is acceptable/ moral. 😀

Good for your religious friend! This is how it’s supposed to be.

Can you please piss off to www.sanctimonioustwats.com? Or some other hyper religious forum for your ilk?

I m not perfect in any way. But what I don’t understand is why people on this forum encourage immoral behavior and get upset when someone encourages moral behavior

I would be with you if the behavior we were talking about was cheating or something… but calling masturbation immoral is a stretch, and the religions that do so have a history of keeping women subservient. So I’m with the PP. Pleasure yourself or don’t, I don’t care, but don’t be all sanctimonious on those who think it’s a beautiful thing.

Masturbation is a sin, it may not be as bad as cheating but still it is a sin.

I’m not religious and don’t believe in the concept of sin, so none of this applies to me.