Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. As additional context, the nanny and her husband live together with their kids. The kids who still live at home are high school aged or older. My impression is the DD simply would like to join her mom on this trip. Nanny contract does not require vacation work, so this is an additional request. This would have no impact on vacation to which she is otherwise entitled. We take more than one vacation per year, and she'll have time off the next time we vacation without her, in addition to other time off to which she's entitled.
Side note, I am chuckling at the suggestion that people who have means to live comfortably are not entitled to try to save money where they can.
Side note - I am chuckling at your implied suggestion that the nanny's kids don't have the right to want to spend time with their mom. Nanny should turn you down.
I don't think you read well. She has the right to want to spend time with her mother, but she does not have the right to go to work with her mother. Do yours?
This only makes sense if the nanny is expected to work all day every day. I just brought a family member on a work trip to hang out with during my off hours. It made being there much more enjoyable.
Anonymous wrote:Also, nanny and daughter don’t have to accompany you to the nicest restaurants. They can have a cozy dinner by themselves.
Anonymous wrote:I think the folks trying to compare this to their 9-5 white collar jobs are missing the point.
Nannies largely do not get to set their own vacation schedules, and do not have unlimited time off.
OP's nanny is being asked to give up vacation time to make OP's life easier. There's no indication in OP's post that this time will be recouped later. It makes total sense to me as the parent of a teen that the nanny might not want to give up one of her last vacations with her teen, AND that she's afraid to say no to her employer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. As additional context, the nanny and her husband live together with their kids. The kids who still live at home are high school aged or older. My impression is the DD simply would like to join her mom on this trip. Nanny contract does not require vacation work, so this is an additional request. This would have no impact on vacation to which she is otherwise entitled. We take more than one vacation per year, and she'll have time off the next time we vacation without her, in addition to other time off to which she's entitled.
Side note, I am chuckling at the suggestion that people who have means to live comfortably are not entitled to try to save money where they can.
Chuckle, chuckle. Your nanny is trying to accommodate your vacation schedule and your preference for not having to care for your children during this vacation, a “request” which falls outside the scope of her employment contract. In return, you presume to know your nanny’s family dynamics and show no empathy or generosity whatsoever for her family. That is just hilarious.
Anonymous wrote:I think everyone is giving OP a very hard time. OP, I get it. It is a lot to bring an additional person on vacation with you. I don’t know the logistics but I can see it being an extra air fare, extra hotel room, another vehicle needed for transportation, etc. I would talk with my husband and see if we could bring the teen. I get it for them too. This may be a once in a lifetime experience for them and they want to experience it. Maybe there is a happy middle ground where you pay for half of the teens stuff? Then the rest she pays on her own but you pay her for this vacation up front to her so that she has spending money? So let’s say you pay for the hotel and airfare but everything else is up to her. If you go to an expensive restaurant then leave the kids at home with her. Go out and enjoy yourselves. Maybe treat them to one nice meal out on you all with just them two? I would try to accommodate if I can.