Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:At one of the schools, my kids were, people connected over social status, a physician would rather be friends with another physician's SAHM wife than with another working mom who is a receptionist or a coder because both families had more things in common.
This is probably true.
When I have heard people say that they want more WOHM friends, they mean someone with a similar level of education. They aren’t trying to befriend the women who clean their houses.
Yes. People who are obsessed with the mommy wars tend to by high SES and really only care about other high SES families. So the SAHMs who look down on working moms tend to be rich SAHMs who either view it as "selfish" to work (because the husband is high earning and the family could survive on just his income) or they pity women who "have" to work because their husbands don't make enough to keep the family UMC without the added income.
On the flip side, wealthy working moms are much more likely to criticize SAHMs as lazy, vapid, and unintelligent, because they generalize that SAHMs are all in wealthy families where they can afford housecleaners, nannies, preschool, etc., and thus the SAHMs aren't actually taking care of kids or the house all day but going to yoga and getting over involved at school and gossiping with other SAHMs. This attitude about SAHMs makes them very dismissive of the idea that being a SAHM can be challenging, require intellect and skills, etc.
In the real world where not everyone has an HHI of 300k or more, most moms have to work because life is insanely expensive and if you want to be able to afford housing, retire at a reasonable age, and send your kids even to in-state schools, you need to incomes. But also many women are in fields that do not pay well and childcare is insanely expensive, so some women become SAHMs during the kid's early years and then return to work at least part-time once they are in school, because it winds up being more cost-effective for a family to have a SAHM instead of paying for childcare 0-5. But these SAHMs work incredibly hard, are doing the hands on work of caring for kids during the workweek without paid help, and also wind up doing the vast majority of the household chores and family administration. These moms are not spending their days clothes shopping and going to yoga and getting their hair done.
I'm in the latter group and was a SAHM for three years when my DC was young until she qualified for universal PK, and would have SAHMed longer but we had secondary infertility so I returned to work sooner. I actually did occasionally freelance projects while I was a SAHM because money was tight plus I knew I needed to stay current and maintain contacts so I could reenter the workforce. We had zero help during this time, not even occasional babysitters because we could not afford them. I did it all and was exhausted, but I also made an effort to take my DC to museums and concerts, I read a lot of books, I became very knowledgeable about child development, and I published several short stories in literary mags. The idea that I was lazy or uninteresting is laughable to me. And now I work and I still feel like I "do it all." We still can't afford to outsource much but now I can go get my haircut on my lunch hour and my kid is at school so I feel a bit more sane. Summers are hard-to-impossible and I absolutely feel the second shift when I get home from work and still have to make dinner, prep lunch, clean up, check homework, email the pediatrician, research orthodontists, make sure we have everything on the summer camp checklist for next week so I can order anything missing, etc.
OP and people like her are just a net negative to society. If OP has ever encountered me at a school event, when I was a SAHM or now, and though "ugh this person isn't interesting enough for me, I need a more intellectual conversational partner," then OP can go **** *******.