Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Surprised no one seems to have mentioned politics. If your child is MAGA, go to Davidson and if smart, go to Amherst. Amherst has a much better reputation.
??? Especially in athletics, Amherst has a decent population of conservative students. The reason Amherst went so D.E.I. was because it was essentially a finishing school for wealthy white boarding school alum
In my world, Amherst has a reputation for being a bunch of d*cks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Surprised no one seems to have mentioned politics. If your child is MAGA, go to Davidson and if smart, go to Amherst. Amherst has a much better reputation.
??? Especially in athletics, Amherst has a decent population of conservative students. The reason Amherst went so D.E.I. was because it was essentially a finishing school for wealthy white boarding school alum
Anonymous wrote:Surprised no one seems to have mentioned politics. If your child is MAGA, go to Davidson and if smart, go to Amherst. Amherst has a much better reputation.
Anonymous wrote:Surprised no one seems to have mentioned politics. If your child is MAGA, go to Davidson and if smart, go to Amherst. Amherst has a much better reputation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All this talk about Amherst, Williams, and “The Street,” reminds me of all the chatter about Bucknell! So, are all these schools peers? If not, stop the crap about “The Steet,” which says little about the school and more about the kids who attend - greedy, competitive, athletic, not intellectual.
Reading is fundamental. OP’s child is interested in finance.
Agree, reading is fundamental.
OP: Econ major with business-type aspirations at this young age.
Where in this comment is there anything about finance or The Street?
Business-type aspirations refers to what?
Good question. Bizarre phrasing, yet she’s somehow surprised posters don’t know what this means. Hope her kid is a better writer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All this talk about Amherst, Williams, and “The Street,” reminds me of all the chatter about Bucknell! So, are all these schools peers? If not, stop the crap about “The Steet,” which says little about the school and more about the kids who attend - greedy, competitive, athletic, not intellectual.
Reading is fundamental. OP’s child is interested in finance.
Agree, reading is fundamental.
OP: Econ major with business-type aspirations at this young age.
Where in this comment is there anything about finance or The Street?
Business-type aspirations refers to what?
Anonymous wrote:All this talk about Amherst, Williams, and “The Street,” reminds me of all the chatter about Bucknell! So, are all these schools peers? If not, stop the crap about “The Steet,” which says little about the school and more about the kids who attend - greedy, competitive, athletic, not intellectual.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All this talk about Amherst, Williams, and “The Street,” reminds me of all the chatter about Bucknell! So, are all these schools peers? If not, stop the crap about “The Steet,” which says little about the school and more about the kids who attend - greedy, competitive, athletic, not intellectual.
Reading is fundamental. OP’s child is interested in finance.
Agree, reading is fundamental.
OP: Econ major with business-type aspirations at this young age.
Where in this comment is there anything about finance or The Street?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All this talk about Amherst, Williams, and “The Street,” reminds me of all the chatter about Bucknell! So, are all these schools peers? If not, stop the crap about “The Steet,” which says little about the school and more about the kids who attend - greedy, competitive, athletic, not intellectual.
Reading is fundamental. OP’s child is interested in finance.
Agree, reading is fundamental.
OP: Econ major with business-type aspirations at this young age.
Where in this comment is there anything about finance or The Street?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All this talk about Amherst, Williams, and “The Street,” reminds me of all the chatter about Bucknell! So, are all these schools peers? If not, stop the crap about “The Steet,” which says little about the school and more about the kids who attend - greedy, competitive, athletic, not intellectual.
Reading is fundamental. OP’s child is interested in finance.
Anonymous wrote:All this talk about Amherst, Williams, and “The Street,” reminds me of all the chatter about Bucknell! So, are all these schools peers? If not, stop the crap about “The Steet,” which says little about the school and more about the kids who attend - greedy, competitive, athletic, not intellectual.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't forget its intersection with "The reason Amherst students go to grad school at high rates is because they can't get jobs."Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me rattle off all the bad faith anti-Amherst talking points before someone else gets to them:
- Campus is such a dump that opening your eyes is unbearable
- Athletes and non-athletes get into fights if they make eye contact
- Fellowships are so rare that the school holds celebrations if someone gets one
- Academics are so low-caliber that students only go to local state schools for graduate school
- Every single student is an LGBTQ+ test-optional POC
I think that covers it
I think you have them all covered except that the job placement is so bad that kids are forced to go to NYC and work in finance.
Or, they’re highly intelligent, academically successful, and professionally ambitious compared to those with only undergraduate degrees? Amherst is top-ranked for outcomes in medicine and law, for example.