Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gotta say, the dispensary adjacent to the UDC campus is just a horrible look. Do better DC.

But you're totally ok with liquor stores right next to UDC? Right?

Pretty sure CW liquor predates that UDC location by several decades. But yeah, I would also oppose any new liquor stores for sure.

You would oppose adults having access to a liquor store? You realize these are adults, right??

Which part of “new” do you need help with? Maybe lay off the ganja for a bit, you seem paranoid.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gotta say, the dispensary adjacent to the UDC campus is just a horrible look. Do better DC.

But you're totally ok with liquor stores right next to UDC? Right?

Pretty sure CW liquor predates that UDC location by several decades. But yeah, I would also oppose any new liquor stores for sure.

You would oppose adults having access to a liquor store? You realize these are adults, right??

Which part of “new” do you need help with? Maybe lay off the ganja for a bit, you seem paranoid.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gotta say, the dispensary adjacent to the UDC campus is just a horrible look. Do better DC.

But you're totally ok with liquor stores right next to UDC? Right?

Pretty sure CW liquor predates that UDC location by several decades. But yeah, I would also oppose any new liquor stores for sure.

You would oppose adults having access to a liquor store? You realize these are adults, right??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gotta say, the dispensary adjacent to the UDC campus is just a horrible look. Do better DC.

But you're totally ok with liquor stores right next to UDC? Right?

Pretty sure CW liquor predates that UDC location by several decades. But yeah, I would also oppose any new liquor stores for sure.

You would oppose adults having access to a liquor store? You realize these are adults, right??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gotta say, the dispensary adjacent to the UDC campus is just a horrible look. Do better DC.

But you're totally ok with liquor stores right next to UDC? Right?

Pretty sure CW liquor predates that UDC location by several decades. But yeah, I would also oppose any new liquor stores for sure.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gotta say, the dispensary adjacent to the UDC campus is just a horrible look. Do better DC.

But you're totally ok with liquor stores right next to UDC? Right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, it WAS a social justice victory for White Liberals. It helped quench their thirst for their white guilt + virtue signaling. None of that is actually intended to help blacks, but in their mind it is, because they want to be seen as "saviors" for blacks/minorities.

Only white people voted for this?

They are the only people that have ID.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, it WAS a social justice victory for White Liberals. It helped quench their thirst for their white guilt + virtue signaling. None of that is actually intended to help blacks, but in their mind it is, because they want to be seen as "saviors" for blacks/minorities.

Only white people voted for this?

Anonymous wrote:Gotta say, the dispensary adjacent to the UDC campus is just a horrible look. Do better DC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Democrats wanted this, you voted for it.
Also, it's about "equity" since minorities were committing the crime the most so instead of them stopping doing it, we'll just decriminalize it. Liberal thought process, just like with school standards

Former Speaker of the House, John Boehner, one of the most conservative Republicans and about white guy from Ohio, was the biggest champion of legalizing marijuana.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/03/us/politics/john-boehner-marijuana-cannabis.html

This is a big Yawn, since we know this is most pervasive in Democrat cities/urban areas, and we know the usual stance; racist to criminalize weed, disproportionate crime, it's not hurting anyone etc.
Bottom line is this was never accepted in the suburbs, and was guilted to be accepted in the cities by Democrats.
If a Republican ran on criminalizing weed, it would get great support, and guess who would be insanely against it and call it racist etc??? Democrats!

BAHAHAHAHAHAHA I live in Frederick County and have a bridge to sell you. Lots of weed shops and plenty of pick up trucks and rednecks getting their grass there every day.

Is the a weed dispensary on the campus of Frederick Community College like there is at UDC?

No idea and it doesn't matter. Your premise that only the delinquent black youth in DC are smoking weed is ridiculous. Because that's exactly what you were saying. Maybe get our of your racist bubble and you'll see plenty or rural rednecks like their THC too.

How many rural rednecks live in DC?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Democrats wanted this, you voted for it.
Also, it's about "equity" since minorities were committing the crime the most so instead of them stopping doing it, we'll just decriminalize it. Liberal thought process, just like with school standards

Former Speaker of the House, John Boehner, one of the most conservative Republicans and about white guy from Ohio, was the biggest champion of legalizing marijuana.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/03/us/politics/john-boehner-marijuana-cannabis.html

This is a big Yawn, since we know this is most pervasive in Democrat cities/urban areas, and we know the usual stance; racist to criminalize weed, disproportionate crime, it's not hurting anyone etc.
Bottom line is this was never accepted in the suburbs, and was guilted to be accepted in the cities by Democrats.
If a Republican ran on criminalizing weed, it would get great support, and guess who would be insanely against it and call it racist etc??? Democrats!

BAHAHAHAHAHAHA I live in Frederick County and have a bridge to sell you. Lots of weed shops and plenty of pick up trucks and rednecks getting their grass there every day.

Is the a weed dispensary on the campus of Frederick Community College like there is at UDC?

No idea and it doesn't matter. Your premise that only the delinquent black youth in DC are smoking weed is ridiculous. Because that's exactly what you were saying. Maybe get our of your racist bubble and you'll see plenty or rural rednecks like their THC too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Expect teens with psychosis and diminished mental acuity in the near future.

That's already happening. I think people voted for legal cannabis bc people were using it anyway. It's no worse than alcohol. So why should we be punishing these people and not drinkers, who generally do far more damage to themselves and their communities? However, I don't think people were well informed about how damaging cannabis is to young brains. And I don't think it occurred to anyone that the entire city would smell like skunk at 9 AM every single day.

In retrospect, legalization should have been accompanied by extremely strict age restrictions - no one under 21 at least, though preferably 25. And smoking in public should have remained illegal, with maybe some tax or price incentives that favored gummies, which don't stink up the entire city. Plus stepped up enforcement for anyone smoking and driving - hefty fines and jail time. Obviously, this will never come to pass bc racism I guess. It's a shame this city can't be practical about things without race getting thrown into everything. But the prevalence of smoking weed among young black teenagers is ridiculous. And that is not a win for the city.

Anonymous wrote:Actually, it WAS a social justice victory for White Liberals. It helped quench their thirst for their white guilt + virtue signaling. None of that is actually intended to help blacks, but in their mind it is, because they want to be seen as "saviors" for blacks/minorities.