Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m going to be honest. It’s the hours of video games and screens.
Yes, 100%. If people want to honestly ask "what has changed in the last 30 years?", video games have absolutely changed the profile of how boys spend their time. And, if we're being honest: porn.
We are living in a time of pollution, microplastics, endocrine disruptors, etc.
This is the only part of your comment that could possibly explain the recent changes in performance
These are gender neutral factors that impact boys and the girls the same.
ADHD also affects boys and girls about the same. For girls, it’s ADD. For boys it’s AHD.
What really happened: Girls used to get little education two three generations ago. At that time, no parents paid any attention on girls academics. Versus nowadays, a large percentage of educated parents emphasize on education for both genders. Parents places the same expectations on the girls, and finally their performance is catching up.
Given that you are using terms that have been out-of-date for a decade, your whole post doesn't read as credible.
It wasn’t just that parents placed less emphasis on girls’ education (though certainly a factor). Professors as recent as the 1960s that I know of sometimes said things like female student earned A but it’s curved so I’m switching your grade to a B because the boys need the As for their careers. High school girls were earlier stripped of being valedictorian because again the boys needed the accolades.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. I know someone in college admissions at a well regarded state school and this is actually a major concern of his. In general, the pool of qualified males is much smaller than qualified females.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's more than caught up, in many respects. You still haven't explained the gap (unless it's some sexist BS about one gender somehow being inherently smarter than the other)Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m going to be honest. It’s the hours of video games and screens.
Yes, 100%. If people want to honestly ask "what has changed in the last 30 years?", video games have absolutely changed the profile of how boys spend their time. And, if we're being honest: porn.
We are living in a time of pollution, microplastics, endocrine disruptors, etc.
This is the only part of your comment that could possibly explain the recent changes in performance
These are gender neutral factors that impact boys and the girls the same.
ADHD also affects boys and girls about the same. For girls, it’s ADD. For boys it’s AHD.
What really happened: Girls used to get little education two three generations ago. At that time, no parents paid any attention on girls academics. Versus nowadays, a large percentage of educated parents emphasize on education for both genders. Parents places the same expectations on the girls, and finally their performance is catching up.
Have you ever seen the results of IQ tests? Girls are more of a bell curve with a strong and sustained middle while boys have more at both the weak and the high ends. While the averages turn out the same, the distribution is not. This presents challenges in the school setting.
Source, please
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m going to be honest. It’s the hours of video games and screens.
Yes, 100%. If people want to honestly ask "what has changed in the last 30 years?", video games have absolutely changed the profile of how boys spend their time. And, if we're being honest: porn.
We are living in a time of pollution, microplastics, endocrine disruptors, etc.
This is the only part of your comment that could possibly explain the recent changes in performance
These are gender neutral factors that impact boys and the girls the same.
ADHD also affects boys and girls about the same. For girls, it’s ADD. For boys it’s AHD.
What really happened: Girls used to get little education two three generations ago. At that time, no parents paid any attention on girls academics. Versus nowadays, a large percentage of educated parents emphasize on education for both genders. Parents places the same expectations on the girls, and finally their performance is catching up.
Given that you are using terms that have been out-of-date for a decade, your whole post doesn't read as credible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At many colleges (MIT, Caltech, Georgia Tech, Purdue, etc.) female applicants get an advantage over male applicants—affirmative action for girls. One can infer that this is needed to keep the gender ratio balanced. Without it, would males would be admitted at a significantly higher rate than frmale? Do boys put together better applicants than girls?Anonymous wrote:At many colleges (Swarthmore, Brown, Wesleyan, Vassar, etc.) male applicants get an advantage over female applicants—affirmative action for boys. One can infer that this is needed to keep the gender ratio balanced. Without it, would females would be admitted at a significantly higher rate than males? Do girls put together better applicants than boys?
This seems like the conclusion that many posters here come to. All the boys I know are extremely high achieving though, so it’s hard for me to wrap my head around.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m going to be honest. It’s the hours of video games and screens.
Yes, 100%. If people want to honestly ask "what has changed in the last 30 years?", video games have absolutely changed the profile of how boys spend their time. And, if we're being honest: porn.
We are living in a time of pollution, microplastics, endocrine disruptors, etc.
This is the only part of your comment that could possibly explain the recent changes in performance
These are gender neutral factors that impact boys and the girls the same.
ADHD also affects boys and girls about the same. For girls, it’s ADD. For boys it’s AHD.
What really happened: Girls used to get little education two three generations ago. At that time, no parents paid any attention on girls academics. Versus nowadays, a large percentage of educated parents emphasize on education for both genders. Parents places the same expectations on the girls, and finally their performance is catching up.
Given that you are using terms that have been out-of-date for a decade, your whole post doesn't read as credible.
It wasn’t just that parents placed less emphasis on girls’ education (though certainly a factor). Professors as recent as the 1960s that I know of sometimes said things like female student earned A but it’s curved so I’m switching your grade to a B because the boys need the As for their careers. High school girls were earlier stripped of being valedictorian because again the boys needed the accolades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Girls have higher GPAs than boys on average.
A lot more women teacher in high school.
The girls have better ECs too. They mature quicker and are more organized. It’s no surprise that they do better than the boys.
You’re both right. The elementary and middle school years of sit still, be quiet and pay attention with, what, 30 minutes of recess, does not jibe well with male developmental timelines. The boys come into high school with delayed executive functioning skills. So teachers, especially female teachers, often treat boys like broken girls.
People say this all the time, but this is the school system that was designed by men, for boys. Nothing has changed: the length of recess, the age of kids when they start high school. Are we suggesting that boys have had some sort of gene shift in the past 30 years?
This!!! Education today is actually MORE in line with what boys need. Schools were extremely strict decades ago when boys were killing it. When FINALLY given the opportunity for equality, girls surpassed them. It has nothing to do with the curriculum, which is more liberal/open than ever. Boys have always been less mature and slower to develop exec functioning. That is not why they're falling behind. It does no good to keep making excuses.
I agree, I have been saying the same thing, and people ignore the fact that school is more “boy” friendly now than ever before. Wiggles are allowed, walking in class is allowed, moving is allowed. Schools have come a long way. And yet….
I’m going to be honest. It’s the hours of video games and screens. Boys need to be outside playing with others - climbing, exploring, cooperating, helping, making, taking care of others. Right now, with the exception of sports, they live indoors. So many boys are helpless. I see some who do an amazing job. I have been floored by the maturity and agency of some boys. But so many mothers distrust their sons and keep them on a leash. Huge mistake.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m going to be honest. It’s the hours of video games and screens.
Yes, 100%. If people want to honestly ask "what has changed in the last 30 years?", video games have absolutely changed the profile of how boys spend their time. And, if we're being honest: porn.
We are living in a time of pollution, microplastics, endocrine disruptors, etc.
This is the only part of your comment that could possibly explain the recent changes in performance
These are gender neutral factors that impact boys and the girls the same.
ADHD also affects boys and girls about the same. For girls, it’s ADD. For boys it’s AHD.
What really happened: Girls used to get little education two three generations ago. At that time, no parents paid any attention on girls academics. Versus nowadays, a large percentage of educated parents emphasize on education for both genders. Parents places the same expectations on the girls, and finally their performance is catching up.
Given that you are using terms that have been out-of-date for a decade, your whole post doesn't read as credible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m going to be honest. It’s the hours of video games and screens.
Yes, 100%. If people want to honestly ask "what has changed in the last 30 years?", video games have absolutely changed the profile of how boys spend their time. And, if we're being honest: porn.
We are living in a time of pollution, microplastics, endocrine disruptors, etc.
This is the only part of your comment that could possibly explain the recent changes in performance
These are gender neutral factors that impact boys and the girls the same.
ADHD also affects boys and girls about the same. For girls, it’s ADD. For boys it’s AHD.
What really happened: Girls used to get little education two three generations ago. At that time, no parents paid any attention on girls academics. Versus nowadays, a large percentage of educated parents emphasize on education for both genders. Parents places the same expectations on the girls, and finally their performance is catching up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s because there are a lot more female applicants to these schools than their counterparts. To keep a gender balanced environment, their acceptance rate of male is higher than that of female. All lacs brown Yale and a few other ivies.
Opposite in the case of mit Georgia tech cmu scs, uiuc cs, etc. there you see a lot more male applicants
In CA there is a large gender gap between engineering and life sciences. Even in Silicon Valley there are not many girls going for engineering or physics and it is far easier for them to get in. It flips for life sciences, with girls far outnumbering boys so boys have an easier time being admitted.
Business, economics, political science are relatively balanced.
So gender discrimination.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s because there are a lot more female applicants to these schools than their counterparts. To keep a gender balanced environment, their acceptance rate of male is higher than that of female. All lacs brown Yale and a few other ivies.
Opposite in the case of mit Georgia tech cmu scs, uiuc cs, etc. there you see a lot more male applicants
In CA there is a large gender gap between engineering and life sciences. Even in Silicon Valley there are not many girls going for engineering or physics and it is far easier for them to get in. It flips for life sciences, with girls far outnumbering boys so boys have an easier time being admitted.
Business, economics, political science are relatively balanced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's more than caught up, in many respects. You still haven't explained the gap (unless it's some sexist BS about one gender somehow being inherently smarter than the other)Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m going to be honest. It’s the hours of video games and screens.
Yes, 100%. If people want to honestly ask "what has changed in the last 30 years?", video games have absolutely changed the profile of how boys spend their time. And, if we're being honest: porn.
We are living in a time of pollution, microplastics, endocrine disruptors, etc.
This is the only part of your comment that could possibly explain the recent changes in performance
These are gender neutral factors that impact boys and the girls the same.
ADHD also affects boys and girls about the same. For girls, it’s ADD. For boys it’s AHD.
What really happened: Girls used to get little education two three generations ago. At that time, no parents paid any attention on girls academics. Versus nowadays, a large percentage of educated parents emphasize on education for both genders. Parents places the same expectations on the girls, and finally their performance is catching up.
Have you ever seen the results of IQ tests? Girls are more of a bell curve with a strong and sustained middle while boys have more at both the weak and the high ends. While the averages turn out the same, the distribution is not. This presents challenges in the school setting.
Anonymous wrote:At many colleges (MIT, Caltech, Georgia Tech, Purdue, etc.) female applicants get an advantage over male applicants—affirmative action for girls. One can infer that this is needed to keep the gender ratio balanced. Without it, would males would be admitted at a significantly higher rate than frmale? Do boys put together better applicants than girls?Anonymous wrote:At many colleges (Swarthmore, Brown, Wesleyan, Vassar, etc.) male applicants get an advantage over female applicants—affirmative action for boys. One can infer that this is needed to keep the gender ratio balanced. Without it, would females would be admitted at a significantly higher rate than males? Do girls put together better applicants than boys?
This seems like the conclusion that many posters here come to. All the boys I know are extremely high achieving though, so it’s hard for me to wrap my head around.