Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are healthcare CEOs and Trump less guilty of killing people if they use denial of claims or destruction of research as a tool rather than a gun?
Good thought homework for Ethics class....
Healthcare “ceo” didn’t put the whole complex system in place. Whether paid by taxpayers, employers, people, or a mix, there will be terms of coverage, premiums/taxes, and constraints on treatment or care. Period.
Don’t be ignorant and naive to that.
Otherwise, go negotiate your own care and prices directly with the doctors. Go for it.
Or just beg for free treatment covered by someone else. That’s how you think it works anywhere in the world you are quite entitled.
Have to laugh, living on the dole with free everything (except his attorney fees) really suits Luigi. LWOP on the dole. Nice.
You forget that UHC is not a generic representative of the healthcare industry.
"An analysis by ValuePenguin suggests that UnitedHealthcare...denies a staggering 32 percent of claims. That's twice the industry average, and more than any other insurer."
https://futurism.com/neoscope/insurance-ceo-gloating-deny-care
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are healthcare CEOs and Trump less guilty of killing people if they use denial of claims or destruction of research as a tool rather than a gun?
Good thought homework for Ethics class....
Healthcare “ceo” didn’t put the whole complex system in place. Whether paid by taxpayers, employers, people, or a mix, there will be terms of coverage, premiums/taxes, and constraints on treatment or care. Period.
Don’t be ignorant and naive to that.
Otherwise, go negotiate your own care and prices directly with the doctors. Go for it.
Or just beg for free treatment covered by someone else. That’s how you think it works anywhere in the world you are quite entitled.
Have to laugh, living on the dole with free everything (except his attorney fees) really suits Luigi. LWOP on the dole. Nice.
You forget that UHC is not a generic representative of the healthcare industry.
"An analysis by ValuePenguin suggests that UnitedHealthcare...denies a staggering 32 percent of claims. That's twice the industry average, and more than any other insurer."
https://futurism.com/neoscope/insurance-ceo-gloating-deny-care
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:quick poll - do more people on the left or the right condone violence along the lines that this person committed?
I’m a dem. I do not condone what Mangione did, nor the fan girls that propped him up bc he’s mid good looking.
He’s actually not that tall, he’s skinny, and his nose be nosing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are healthcare CEOs and Trump less guilty of killing people if they use denial of claims or destruction of research as a tool rather than a gun?
Good thought homework for Ethics class....
Healthcare “ceo” didn’t put the whole complex system in place. Whether paid by taxpayers, employers, people, or a mix, there will be terms of coverage, premiums/taxes, and constraints on treatment or care. Period.
Don’t be ignorant and naive to that.
Otherwise, go negotiate your own care and prices directly with the doctors. Go for it.
Or just beg for free treatment covered by someone else. That’s how you think it works anywhere in the world you are quite entitled.
Have to laugh, living on the dole with free everything (except his attorney fees) really suits Luigi. LWOP on the dole. Nice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does it have a happy ending where Luigi is executed?
While i certainly do not condone what he did, I don’t think he should be executed.
Not because I oppose capital punishment - I DO believe in the death penalty. But I oppose it for him, in this particular case, because I’m absolutely certain he *wouldn’t* be facing the death penalty if he’d shot ME in the back. Or you. Because we’re both nobodies. And they wouldn’t have pursued a death penalty against him for killing me. But going for a death penalty in this case where he kills a rich CEO? That messaging tells me that my life isn’t as important as Thompson’s.
That is why I oppose his possible execution. Because he wouldn’t face death if he’d shot you or me.
You don’t get it.
Killing a representative of an industry whilst leaving labels bullets and Monopoly money, and then a Note to the Feds, is a highly deliberate political move designed to rile up the masses and create unrest.
Killing you and labeling some bullets with DCUM sux or DC puke would not incite that.
Hence the terrorism charge and politicalization out of the gate, by Luigi, on purpose.
The Parkland school shooter didn’t get the death penalty for killing 14 kids and 3 staff members. Come to think of it, I don’t think any school shooter has been threatened with the death penalty.
Yet, we’re supposed to believe the death of one CEO is worse than the massacre of a bunch of kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does it have a happy ending where Luigi is executed?
While i certainly do not condone what he did, I don’t think he should be executed.
Not because I oppose capital punishment - I DO believe in the death penalty. But I oppose it for him, in this particular case, because I’m absolutely certain he *wouldn’t* be facing the death penalty if he’d shot ME in the back. Or you. Because we’re both nobodies. And they wouldn’t have pursued a death penalty against him for killing me. But going for a death penalty in this case where he kills a rich CEO? That messaging tells me that my life isn’t as important as Thompson’s.
That is why I oppose his possible execution. Because he wouldn’t face death if he’d shot you or me.
You don’t get it.
Killing a representative of an industry whilst leaving labels bullets and Monopoly money, and then a Note to the Feds, is a highly deliberate political move designed to rile up the masses and create unrest.
Killing you and labeling some bullets with DCUM sux or DC puke would not incite that.
Hence the terrorism charge and politicalization out of the gate, by Luigi, on purpose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leave it to San Francisco to make light of someone's murder.
Leave it to the U.S. healthcare system to profit off people’s health problems and not GAF if you get care or not as long as they make a profit.
Their profit was razor thin and barely existent. Learn some basic finance. After than go learn and compare quality of care, death panels and P&L of the various countries’ health insurance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:quick poll - do more people on the left or the right condone violence along the lines that this person committed?
I’m a dem. I do not condone what Mangione did, nor the fan girls that propped him up bc he’s mid good looking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does it have a happy ending where Luigi is executed?
While i certainly do not condone what he did, I don’t think he should be executed.
Not because I oppose capital punishment - I DO believe in the death penalty. But I oppose it for him, in this particular case, because I’m absolutely certain he *wouldn’t* be facing the death penalty if he’d shot ME in the back. Or you. Because we’re both nobodies. And they wouldn’t have pursued a death penalty against him for killing me. But going for a death penalty in this case where he kills a rich CEO? That messaging tells me that my life isn’t as important as Thompson’s.
That is why I oppose his possible execution. Because he wouldn’t face death if he’d shot you or me.
Anonymous wrote:Does it have a happy ending where Luigi is executed?
Anonymous wrote:Are healthcare CEOs and Trump less guilty of killing people if they use denial of claims or destruction of research as a tool rather than a gun?
Good thought homework for Ethics class....
Anonymous wrote:quick poll - do more people on the left or the right condone violence along the lines that this person committed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:quick poll - do more people on the left or the right condone violence along the lines that this person committed?
The violent ones are definitely on the left.
Right. Like J6 "protestors"?