Anonymous wrote:Water polo takes 10x more endurance than wrestling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.espn.com/espn/page2/sportSkills
Bumping this chart. This is correct. The OP putting swimming at the top was ridiculous. I'm surprised football is above basketball. People who don't know basketball have no clue about the physicality and athleticism involved with basketball. It's a lot of jumping and running.
I agree, I think football is more about whining about injuries than anything. The point is they don't really condition that much or play that often. Yeah, people get hurt badly when they play, but getting beat up isn't necessarily tough. Basketball you have games twice a week at least. Tough is getting back up and playing the next day. Putting in the time strengthen all of those ankle and knee tendons and ligaments so that you can play at a high level every day. Football players don't really do that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:# 1 is definitely wrestling
This
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wrestling unrivaled in toughness both physical and mental.
Wrestling is hard but rounds last two minutes. There are plenty of bad athletes we that succeed in wrestling because you don't need strength, speed, or really anything else at the youth level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.espn.com/espn/page2/sportSkills
Bumping this chart. This is correct. The OP putting swimming at the top was ridiculous. I'm surprised football is above basketball. People who don't know basketball have no clue about the physicality and athleticism involved with basketball. It's a lot of jumping and running.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone that put baseball last either has no kid actually in baseball or they play crap little league or non-travel on the small field…or their kids bats 12 and plays RF consistently. My kid comes home battered and bruised. Also a tough mental game with actual strategy.
My kid will be playing college baseball next year and I still would place baseball near the last (as would he).
It’s hard to understand your logic whatsoever with a sport where the starters on defense and offense literally spend 90% of the time standing around (unless pitcher or catcher) or sitting if you aren’t at bat vs sports like crew, wrestling, water polo where it’s 100% all out physical activity.
I actually think it’s great on the college level because baseball has the highest team retention rates in general compared to sports like crew because you don’t come back from every single practice or game/regatta completely wiped out…and then quitting when you realize how much of the college experience you are missing.
Anonymous wrote:My kids row and swim, and they are both tough. But have you seen normal people get into a fight or wrestling match? They crap out in less than 2 min. Wrestling and boxing look very intense.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone that put baseball last either has no kid actually in baseball or they play crap little league or non-travel on the small field…or their kids bats 12 and plays RF consistently. My kid comes home battered and bruised. Also a tough mental game with actual strategy.
Anonymous wrote:I think the soccer guys would be the fittest on average, so I’ll vote for soccer as the most physically demanding sport.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Baseball requires the most skills mastery. None of the other sports really require skill.
Have you ever watched a water polo game?
Yes, of course.
Name another sport where failing 70% of the time is considered success?
The only sport requiring more skill than baseball is golf.
The others, including water polo, really don’t require that many skills.