Anonymous wrote:Barnard- people in America have the attention spans of goldfish and the memories of a dementia patient. Is Columbia in hot water at the moment? Yeah, but it is still Columbia, and acting otherwise is foolish
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Barnard, access to Columbia profs is no joke- being a college in NYC attracts top talent, and you will have so many opportunities than at Colby. Not sure why McGill is even being mentioned.
Some people earlier in the thread and in others have said they think McGill over Barnard no question given current chaos. We had thought it was no-question Barnard but people seem to be really thinking there are major issues right now and that McGill is a well known and respected top university like UCLA or Mich
Anonymous wrote:Barnard, access to Columbia profs is no joke- being a college in NYC attracts top talent, and you will have so many opportunities than at Colby. Not sure why McGill is even being mentioned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Colby! Barnard is such a hot mess with their pro-Hamas proffs ruining it for all.
Completely ridiculous and offensive post.
Anonymous wrote:Colby! Barnard is such a hot mess with their pro-Hamas proffs ruining it for all.
Anonymous wrote:This is a great thread! Good insight! Wondering if anyone that knows Barnard knows if it has a cut-throat culture or is it collaborative? Cliquey or friendly/inclusive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s nothing Colby has Barnard doesn’t. There’s a lot Barnard has access to, that Colby doesn’t.
Barnard full of disruptive protestors. Hard no.
There are disruptors on the vast majority of college campus's, at McGill as well. Its wverywhere.
+1. Students have the right to protest injustice. That shows they’re engaged and informed as citizens. I personally prefer McGill. Yes Colby has become “selective” but that’s because they took the application fee away…